Ao avaliar as duas soluções, os avaliadores consideraram Nucleus mais fácil de usar. No entanto, os avaliadores preferiram a facilidade de configuração para Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) junto com a administração. Os avaliadores concordaram que ambos os fornecedores facilitam igualmente os negócios no geral.
pontuação Kenna, status de vulnerabilidade, correções
sometime its hard to work with queries , they should work more on creating simple queries.
Automation rules help with configuration.
It's in the title. The product is unreliable. The platform is buggy, and in the opinion of most of the people I work with that use Nucleus regularly, this has gotten worse over time, not better. The new features are nice, but a working product is nicer....
pontuação Kenna, status de vulnerabilidade, correções
Automation rules help with configuration.
sometime its hard to work with queries , they should work more on creating simple queries.
It's in the title. The product is unreliable. The platform is buggy, and in the opinion of most of the people I work with that use Nucleus regularly, this has gotten worse over time, not better. The new features are nice, but a working product is nicer....