Working Model Reviews & Product Details

This website can create detailed simulations of evolving systems. The interface of the platform is so simple that anyone can use it easily. It feels like an online showroom where I can actively test the efficacy of various designs without going through a process of physical manufacturing. I can actually see how the plans work in real time and quickly, which leads to better schemes in the end. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Although it is well-suited in webbings, Working Model's performance may lag when it comes to intricate designs. This gets me frustrated when interpretation of cellular features is required in lab report. Also, the cost can be a deterrent of the advertisement for hobbyists or the casual users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate this software as it handles data files smoothly without any delays or data loss. The high end hardware configuration ensures a performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Despite its usefulness in providing dependable calculations the software does have some limitations. As it requires expertise in Python and precision to fully utilize its capabilities. And while the 2D design version serves its purpose it is overshadowed by the reliable 3D design version. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I used Sigmaplot for a graphical study and analysis and I found it to be very easy and handy to plot by loading the data sets, the broad option for customization had made it very widely used graph plotting software. It helped a lot to understand the graphical results in a short period.

The user interface was also simple and basic to use, without complexity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Well while working on large data files, I noticed it lag a bit also it sometimes miss plot certain data if working on big data files.

Also, there is limited access to free users, and its cost is a bit high than required. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Well working with PETREL and ROXAR has been a wonderful experience during my final year projects. Petrel was one of my favorites, because of its features that included well log data, seismic and reservoir analysis. Its strong modeling integration of petrophysics, seismic interpretation, geology, reservoir engineering, and geophysics had the ability to integrate all kinds of data types and make the good benefits of interpretation. I also like the very impressive visual feeling in 3D. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Petrel crashes a lot, which makes data losing an additional problem. Apart from this, the hardware configuration is quite a high end for both softwares. Also, license issue is costly and not available to all, some limited feature must be open for students to learn. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In working model software a detailed analysis can be carried out about kinematics. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are no such downsides of working model software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The capability to interact with any model's parts and graph the movement and the force on any element in my project under consideration Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Basic commands such as one for rope seem to be limited to "string through whole type" Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Task assignment control. Time saving and effective communications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Function definition. Would like to see more flexibility on job definition. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

You have in each union, trajectories, speeds, accelerations, forces, among others. It is very useful. I had contact with this software during my university course called "Dynamics of mechanisms and machinery". It is practical, easy to learn, you have many information in the configurations made, even if the number of links used is high. Time is a limiting factor in the design process, in that sense, working 2D model helps to dismute those times. It allows to be more effective in the conceptual design process. You do not need to create a physical prototype. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The 2D Design Version, from the point of view of conceptual design it is very useful, since you have the calculations quickly and reliably. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.