TypeScript Reviews & Product Details

I have been using TypeScript for web development over the past two years, primarily for its reliability and security in maintaining applications. I appreciate how TypeScript enhances the logic and reliability of applications, making them more secure and scalable compared to JavaScript, which I used previously. The deep benefits I experience include the type system and error detection capabilities, which improve the reliability of my code. When using TypeScript in Visual Studio Code, changes in payloads or object types are seamlessly captured, and errors are effectively detected, providing me with immediate feedback and ensuring that the whole application is kept consistent after any changes. TypeScript has made my applications and packages work more securely and logically between them, fulfilling its primary objective to improve code quality. Its use of types has improved the reliability of my projects and has made the integration with tools like Next.js and Tailwind CSS more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find it challenging that browsers like Google Chrome, Opera, and Firefox don't directly read TypeScript. I believe TypeScript should be integrated more into these platforms in the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Trypescript is an extremely useful tool for those who want to practice or review TypeScript concepts quickly and interactively. The interface is clean, intuitive, and focused on user experience, which makes it easier for both beginners and more experienced developers.

One of the biggest advantages of the app is the ability to test code directly in the browser, without the need for installation or environment configuration. This makes learning more accessible and dynamic. Additionally, it provides immediate feedback, which helps in identifying errors and improving logic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

On the other hand, the app may present limitations in more complex projects, as it is geared towards simple examples and quick tests. Even so, it fulfills its purpose very well as an educational and experimentation tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love using TypeScript for its reliability and ease of use. It significantly helps me in organizing documents and efficiently detecting errors early. This feature alone aids greatly in maintaining big projects with minimal stress. I appreciate how it keeps my code clean and organized, making the development process easier and more manageable. Typing errors are caught early, which is extremely helpful in coding and even in managing spelling in documents. Moreover, setting up TypeScript is a stress-free experience—it's very easy and accessible, allowing me to start projects quickly. The seamless integration with other tools, like Styfum, adds to its usefulness, making my tasks even more convenient. Overall, the coding aspect is robust, clear, and understandable, which is critical for my projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the area of helping me to detect typing error earlier Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

helps identify errors earlier and improves code organization Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So far, I have nothing to complain about. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

TypeScript's strong typing and seamless integration with JavaScript improve code maintainability and reduce runtime errors, making it ideal for scalable projects like the ones I've worked on, such as Angular applications handling high user volumes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Strict type checks sometimes feel cumbersome when working on fast-paced projects or with dynamic data structures. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

TypeScript helps bring some clarity and structure to Javascript projects. It's easy to implement at first, and gives you superpowers in your IDE because everything is now typed. You can catch runtime errors before they happen, so you end up with a software of higher quality in the end. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It should be a language of its own, it should not compile to JavaScript. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main benefit is that I can see the error while writing the code I don't need to see my error after the execution of program Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main drawback is it consumes more time when the program is compiled Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Typescript is easier to understand when it is compared with Javascript, overall for people who use it for different purposes rather than front-end development. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't dislike Typescript on any sense. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The nice thing about Typescript are - Static typing, Tooling support, Object-oriented programming, Compatibility with JavaScript Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Initial learning curve

Adding type annotation to almost everything - variables, function parameters and return value

As per my experience, Unlike Javascript, Typescript needs to be compiled, which may become an overhead in a large project Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Well the first thing is type safety, it allows to catch type errors in compile time rather than runtime. It makes the code easier to parse, and to maintain. If you're using a TS friendly IDE, it also makes writing code a breeze. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Compilation times can be long, so it's not as immediate as JavaScript. It's also not as intuitive and requires the developer to read up on the docs before getting started with it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.