22 Tricentis Neoload Reviews
It will provide user friendly environment. Easy to use. It is the best tool to use for performance testing. It will show you proper errors. Result by particular server. particular module. in this you can easily map the integrations . Best tool to use for performance testing.You can select CPU, Memory criteria according to your requirement. It will generate proper result report including graphs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Sometimes error handling it somehwat tough. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Neoload has proven to be an invaluable tool for our performance testing needs. Its intuitive interface makes test creation straightforward, allowing us to simulate real-world scenarios effectively. The scalability and comprehensive reporting have been crucial in identifying and addressing performance bottlenecks. Neoload's versatility in handling various web and mobile applications has significantly enhanced our testing processes, making it a reliable choice for teams focused on optimizing application performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
No dislikes but UI should be enhanced and support should be increase Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It offers features like real time anaytics, collaborative test design technique, auto infra scaling for real time simulations and its scripting free makes life easy for test creation and enhances the productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The advanced config may need deeper expertise, Need to be bit more cost friendly so that small and medim scale enterprises can afford. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It helped me identify bottlenecks in my microservices which were slowing down the performance of the application and this promoted quick response time of numerous APIs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Mobile testing feature needs to be added for various mobile devices and softwares Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Performance test script creation and maintenance are made easier by the Tricentis Neoload's scriptless methodology. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Our organization's infrastructure and tooling may make integration into the current development and testing ecosystems difficult. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Easy to maintenance and quick to generate reports Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Nothing else I couldn't find any issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I would recommend you please go ahead withTricentis Neoload.The most upto date platform in modern world. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Cost wise little bit expensive.Otherwisea Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I have been using NeoLoad for about 3 years now, compared to the previous tool I was using for scripting, NeoLoad is much better. It is really good for somebody who is not looking to write code to emulate the real user behavior. NeoLoad has a wide range of features and options for correlation that makes your script very robust and reliable.
It also has CLI toolkit for engineers looking to automate the process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
1. Lots of clicks! Yes, at times while working on a UI based script that has many transactions, you'll need to use your mouse a lot number of times (expanding the tree, collapsing it, viewing the response, extracting a variable, substituting a file parameter etc have multiple screens between them, you would be clicking on several buttons to achieve these) and it can be frustrating. It slows down the speed of our work.
2. Reporting could have been better - Though GUI reports are elaborate and self-explanatory, reports generated from NeoLoad Web are poor, and are missing several important details and metrics.
3. Lacks feature to integrate NeoLoad with third-party tools - If you want to stream the data generated from NeoLoad to an external database and then use it for analysis, NeoLoad is not going to help you. Neither it has features to stream the data to a thrid party APM (I know they support Dynatrace, but there are many other APMs in the market.) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There are many beautiful features but below are the ones which I like the most:
1. Excellent HTML reporting presentation.
2. Effortless integration with other tools as well, like Jenkins.
3. Script creation and management also is very easy with their inbuilt components. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The only thing that I felt was lagging was that the application was too heavy, and there were some compatibility issues with computers having less RAM. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It provides a robust and reliable platform with excellent performance and a simple GUI. It is easy to use in the automation of script plus innovation in new technology. It has almost all the significant features required in any professional performance tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It has limited support available on the web also has scope to improve in multiple areas. It takes more memory to execute the scripts, which may slow down the system. Also, changing different input fields on the webpage breaks the previous plan. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
