# Top 10 TestRail Alternatives &amp; Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 611
The Software Testing Tools solutions below are the most common alternatives that users and reviewers compare with TestRail. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to TestRail include project management and user interface. The best overall TestRail alternative is BrowserStack. Other similar apps like TestRail are Tuskr, Qase, PractiTest, and OpenText Application Quality Management. TestRail alternatives can be found in [Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing) but may also be in [Test Management Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management).


## Best Paid &amp; Free Alternatives to TestRail
  - [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews)
  - [Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/products/tuskr/reviews)
  - [Qase](https://www.g2.com/products/qase/reviews)
  - [PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/products/practitest/reviews)
  - [OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-application-quality-management/reviews)
  - [Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-qtest/reviews)
  - [Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/products/zephyr-enterprise/reviews)
  - [SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/products/spiratest/reviews)
  - [TestLink](https://www.g2.com/products/testlink/reviews)
  - [QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/products/qmetry-test-management/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to TestRail Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how TestRail stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current &amp; previous users in industries like Computer Software, Automotive, and Marketing and Advertising, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews)
By BrowserStack
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 3,336
BrowserStack is the world’s leading cloud-based testing platform, trusted by 50,000+ Dev and QA teams to deliver fast, reliable, and high-quality software. From manual to automated, visual to accessibility testing, BrowserStack brings every layer of the QA process onto a single, integrated platform, so you can ship confidently at scale. Our Products: Manual Testing Live: Cross-browser testing App Live: Real device testing Testing Toolkit: Essential manual testing tools Test Automation Automate: Browser automation cloud App Automate: Mobile app automation cloud Percy: Visual testing &amp; review App Percy: Visual testing &amp; review Management &amp; Optimization Test Management: Plan, track, and manage tests Test Management for Jira: Manage tests inside Jira Test Reporting &amp; Analytics: Monitor &amp; optimize all tests Automation without coding Low Code Automation: AI-driven automated tests Website Scanner: All-in-one website checker


Reviewers say compared to TestRail, BrowserStack is:
- More expensive
- Easier to set up
- Better at support
Categories in common with TestRail: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Test Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [TestRail vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-testrail)
**Compare BrowserStack with other alternatives:**
- [BrowserStack vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-tuskr)
- [BrowserStack vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-qase)
- [BrowserStack vs PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-practitest)
- [BrowserStack vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-opentext-application-quality-management)
- [BrowserStack vs Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [BrowserStack vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [BrowserStack vs SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-spiratest)
- [BrowserStack vs TestLink](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-testlink)
- [BrowserStack vs QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-qmetry-test-management)

  ### 2. [Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/products/tuskr/reviews)
By Tuskr
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 585
Tuskr is a cloud-based test management software. You can manage test cases, conduct test runs and integrate with your bug and time tracking tools. Tuskr is powerful, yet aesthetically pleasing and intuitive. With its unbeatable pricing, a generous free plan, and a 30-day free trial, Tuskr should be on top of everyone&#39;s evaluation list.


Reviewers say compared to TestRail, Tuskr is:
- More expensive
- Easier to set up
- Better at support
Categories in common with TestRail: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Test Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [TestRail vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/compare/testrail-vs-tuskr)
**Compare Tuskr with other alternatives:**
- [Tuskr vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/compare/qase-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-qtest-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/tuskr-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Tuskr vs SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/spiratest-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs TestLink](https://www.g2.com/compare/testlink-vs-tuskr)
- [Tuskr vs QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-tuskr)

  ### 3. [Qase](https://www.g2.com/products/qase/reviews)
By Qase Inc
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 307
Qase makes it easy to manage test cases, compose test plans and perform test runs as an individual or in a team.


Reviewers say compared to TestRail, Qase is:
- Better at support
- Easier to set up
- More usable
Categories in common with TestRail: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Test Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [TestRail vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/compare/qase-vs-testrail)
**Compare Qase with other alternatives:**
- [Qase vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-qase)
- [Qase vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/compare/qase-vs-tuskr)
- [Qase vs PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-qase)
- [Qase vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-qase)
- [Qase vs Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/qase-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [Qase vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/qase-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Qase vs SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/qase-vs-spiratest)
- [Qase vs TestLink](https://www.g2.com/compare/qase-vs-testlink)
- [Qase vs QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-qase)

  ### 4. [PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/products/practitest/reviews)
By PractiTest
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 233
Simple Test Management allows you to Manage all Requirements, Tests, Runs &amp; Issues using one platform


Reviewers say compared to TestRail, PractiTest is:
- Better at support
- Easier to do business with
- More expensive
Categories in common with TestRail: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Test Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [TestRail vs PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-testrail)
**Compare PractiTest with other alternatives:**
- [PractiTest vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-practitest)
- [PractiTest vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-tuskr)
- [PractiTest vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-qase)
- [PractiTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-practitest)
- [PractiTest vs Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [PractiTest vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [PractiTest vs SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-spiratest)
- [PractiTest vs TestLink](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-testlink)
- [PractiTest vs QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-qmetry-test-management)

  ### 5. [OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-application-quality-management/reviews)
By OpenText
**Average Rating:** 4.0/5
**Total Reviews:** 133
Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is a set of software products designed for accelerating the delivery of secure, reliable modern applications


Reviewers say compared to TestRail, OpenText Application Quality Management is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
Categories in common with TestRail: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Test Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [TestRail vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-testrail)
**Compare OpenText Application Quality Management with other alternatives:**
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-opentext-application-quality-management)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-tuskr)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-qase)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-practitest)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-spiratest)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs TestLink](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-testlink)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management vs QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-qmetry-test-management)

  ### 6. [Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-qtest/reviews)
By Tricentis
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 104
Tricentis qTest is a robust test management solution that makes sophisticated functionality available to all testers at an affordable price.


Reviewers say compared to TestRail, Tricentis qTest is:
- More expensive
Categories in common with TestRail: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Test Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [TestRail vs Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/testrail-vs-tricentis-qtest)
**Compare Tricentis qTest with other alternatives:**
- [Tricentis qTest vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [Tricentis qTest vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-qtest-vs-tuskr)
- [Tricentis qTest vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/compare/qase-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [Tricentis qTest vs PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [Tricentis qTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [Tricentis qTest vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-qtest-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Tricentis qTest vs SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/spiratest-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [Tricentis qTest vs TestLink](https://www.g2.com/compare/testlink-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [Tricentis qTest vs QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-tricentis-qtest)

  ### 7. [Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/products/zephyr-enterprise/reviews)
By SmartBear
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Reviews:** 80
Zephyr E is an on-demand, cloud based Test Management Platform with innovative applications and unparalleled, metrics based visibility via real time dashboards.


Reviewers say compared to TestRail, Zephyr Enterprise is:
- Slower to reach roi
- Easier to admin
Categories in common with TestRail: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Test Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [TestRail vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/testrail-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
**Compare Zephyr Enterprise with other alternatives:**
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/compare/tuskr-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/compare/qase-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/tricentis-qtest-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/spiratest-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs TestLink](https://www.g2.com/compare/testlink-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [Zephyr Enterprise vs QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-zephyr-enterprise)

  ### 8. [SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/products/spiratest/reviews)
By Inflectra
**Average Rating:** 4.3/5
**Total Reviews:** 63
Powerful and Flexible Test Management with Real-Time Reporting


Reviewers say compared to TestRail, SpiraTest is:
- Better at support
- Easier to do business with
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with TestRail: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Test Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [TestRail vs SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/spiratest-vs-testrail)
**Compare SpiraTest with other alternatives:**
- [SpiraTest vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-spiratest)
- [SpiraTest vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/compare/spiratest-vs-tuskr)
- [SpiraTest vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/compare/qase-vs-spiratest)
- [SpiraTest vs PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-spiratest)
- [SpiraTest vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-spiratest)
- [SpiraTest vs Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/spiratest-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [SpiraTest vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/spiratest-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [SpiraTest vs TestLink](https://www.g2.com/compare/spiratest-vs-testlink)
- [SpiraTest vs QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-spiratest)

  ### 9. [TestLink](https://www.g2.com/products/testlink/reviews)
By TestLink
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 61
TestLink Open Source Test Management Application


Categories in common with TestRail: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Test Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [TestRail vs TestLink](https://www.g2.com/compare/testlink-vs-testrail)
**Compare TestLink with other alternatives:**
- [TestLink vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-testlink)
- [TestLink vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/compare/testlink-vs-tuskr)
- [TestLink vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/compare/qase-vs-testlink)
- [TestLink vs PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-testlink)
- [TestLink vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-testlink)
- [TestLink vs Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/testlink-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [TestLink vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/testlink-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [TestLink vs SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/spiratest-vs-testlink)
- [TestLink vs QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-testlink)

  ### 10. [QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/products/qmetry-test-management/reviews)
By QMetry
**Average Rating:** 3.9/5
**Total Reviews:** 38
By using QMetry, QA practitioners can help the entire Development team get detailed and granular insights into the state of the Testing cycle, and into other important metrics like Requirements Coverage. QMetry integrates seamlessly with numerous products in adjacent ALM spaces like Defect Tracking, Requirements Management and Test Automation.


Reviewers say compared to TestRail, QMetry Test Management is:
- Easier to do business with
Categories in common with TestRail: [Software Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Test Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management)

**Compare:** [TestRail vs QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-testrail)
**Compare QMetry Test Management with other alternatives:**
- [QMetry Test Management vs BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/compare/browserstack-vs-qmetry-test-management)
- [QMetry Test Management vs Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-tuskr)
- [QMetry Test Management vs Qase](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-qase)
- [QMetry Test Management vs PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/practitest-vs-qmetry-test-management)
- [QMetry Test Management vs OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/opentext-application-quality-management-vs-qmetry-test-management)
- [QMetry Test Management vs Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-tricentis-qtest)
- [QMetry Test Management vs Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-zephyr-enterprise)
- [QMetry Test Management vs SpiraTest](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-spiratest)
- [QMetry Test Management vs TestLink](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-testlink)


---
## TestRail Alternatives FAQs

### What are the best alternatives to TestRail?

According to G2, the best alternatives to TestRail based on user ratings and review counts include [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) (4.4/5 stars, 3,329 reviews), [Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/products/tuskr/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 573 reviews), and [Qase](https://www.g2.com/products/qase/reviews) (4.7/5 stars, 307 reviews). These tools offer strong usability, ease of administration, and better support compared to TestRail. BrowserStack stands out for its cloud-based real device testing and broad browser/device coverage, Tuskr for its intuitive UI and AI-assisted test case generation, and Qase for its clean interface and automation integration.



### Which Software Testing tools do reviewers recommend instead of TestRail?

Reviewers recommend [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) for comprehensive cross-browser and real device testing with robust automation and AI features. [Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/products/tuskr/reviews) is favored for its simplicity, modern UI, AI-powered test case generation, and cost-effectiveness, making it ideal for teams seeking an efficient, user-friendly test management solution. [Qase](https://www.g2.com/products/qase/reviews) is recommended for teams valuing ease of use, clean organization of test cases, and seamless integration with CI/CD and Jira. These alternatives are preferred for their superior support, modern interfaces, and enhanced collaboration features compared to TestRail.



### How does TestRail compare to BrowserStack?

According to G2 data, both [TestRail](https://www.g2.com/products/testrail/reviews) and [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) share an identical average rating of 4.4 out of 5. However, BrowserStack has a significantly larger review base with 3,329 reviews compared to TestRail&#39;s 611, indicating broader user adoption and feedback. BrowserStack leads TestRail across all evaluated dimensions, with a 0.2-point advantage in Better at Meeting Requirements (8.8 vs 8.6), a 0.3-point lead in More Usable (8.9 vs 8.6), a 0.3-point lead in Easier to Set Up (8.9 vs 8.6), a 0.1-point lead in Easier to Administer (8.7 vs 8.6), a 0.3-point lead in Better at Support (8.7 vs 8.4), and a 0.2-point lead in Easier to Do Business With (8.8 vs 8.6). TestRail is praised for its structured test case management, organization, Jira integration, and detailed reporting, with 13 mentions each for Test Cases and Organization, and 6 mentions for Jira Integration. Conversely, TestRail suffers from slow performance and UI issues, cited in 8 and 5 reviews respectively. BrowserStack excels in ease of use, real device access, device variety, cross-browser testing, automation, and integrations, with over 700 mentions for Ease of Use and Real Devices, and over 400 mentions for Device Variety and Cross-Browser Testing. However, BrowserStack users report slow performance (312 mentions), expensive pricing (259 mentions), and session timeouts or lag (over 200 mentions). Overall, BrowserStack offers a more comprehensive, scalable, and user-friendly solution for cross-browser and real device testing, while TestRail focuses on test case management and organization but faces performance and UI challenges.



### Why do users choose BrowserStack over TestRail?

Users choose [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) over TestRail primarily for its extensive real device cloud, enabling testing on actual hardware across a vast array of browsers and operating systems without maintaining physical labs. BrowserStack&#39;s platform supports seamless integration with automation frameworks like Selenium and CI/CD pipelines, facilitating faster release cycles through parallel test execution. Its intuitive interface and broad device variety (with 645 mentions) allow developers and QA teams to catch environment-specific bugs early, improving overall software quality. The platform&#39;s live testing and debugging tools, including session recordings, logs, and screenshots, enhance collaboration and accelerate issue resolution. Despite some reports of session lag and higher pricing, BrowserStack&#39;s ability to provide instant access to real devices, comprehensive cross-browser coverage, and strong automation support makes it the preferred choice for teams prioritizing scalable, efficient, and reliable testing workflows. Additionally, BrowserStack&#39;s AI-driven features help optimize test suites and automate test case generation, further boosting productivity. These advantages, supported by 734 mentions of ease of use and 697 mentions of real devices, explain why users favor BrowserStack for end-to-end testing needs over TestRail&#39;s test management focus.




## Explore Articles
- [What companies offer secure data room services for private equity transactions?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-companies-offer-secure-data-room-services-for-private-equity-transactions)
- [Best tools for managing data consent and preferences](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-best-tools-for-managing-data-consent-and-preferences)
- [What platform integrates video ads with social media and OTT channels?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-platform-integrates-video-ads-with-social-media-and-ott-channels)
- [Affordable QMS software for startups](https://www.g2.com/discussions/affordable-qms-software-for-startups-which-tools-actually-deliver)
- [What platform integrates recruitment with onboarding systems?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-platform-integrates-recruitment-with-onboarding-systems)
- [Which is the best AI agent platform for automating business workflows?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-is-the-best-ai-agent-platform-for-automating-business-workflows)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Help Desk Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/help-desk)
- [Online Reputation Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/online-reputation-management)
- [Event Registration and Ticketing Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/event-registration-ticketing)

