Testpad Reviews & Product Details

Easy to maintain testcase repositories, test runs,test results and dashboards.

Track the assigned tickets.

Project Management is good.

Easy to use and user-friendly.

Easy collaboration among team with real time updates and comments

It's light weight and no need to have heavy support or maintenance.

It's affordable.

Good for manual testing.

Custom checklist to to track tickets and test cases and test runs.

It's strong choice for teams that priorize flexibility Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is no dedicated mobile app for this.

This is primarily focused more on manual testing and doesn't directly supports test automation frameworks.

Limited and advanced features like compared to jira and other applications testpad is lack in advanced features such as integration with CI/CD pipeline, automation test execution and detailed analytics.

Reporting features are not advanced. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Testpad is good because its offers a systematic way to organize and manage testcases. The ui is simple and allows us to create track and execute test. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is limited in some of the advanced features compared to other testing tools, also lack some integration with bug tracking tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- Simple UI and easy to use even for Non-Technical people.

- It is simple to include team members through email or screenshot upload.

- Pricing is affordable for small teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Testpad is more into QA manual testing and lacks enhanced capabilities like robust automation integration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

best about the testpad is we don't need help of quality analyst. as a user we can also test the product in better way. yes having a tester helps you alot when you are also using test pad. but in starting we doesnt need at all. their was issue once and customer support was helpful very much. so now we are testing our product on testpad all the times. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it doesn't support too heavy automations so that's drawback. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Testpad's intuitive UI and ease of use make managing test cases simple and efficient. The flexibility it offers to create customized workflows has been a game-changer for our team Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some integrations could be smoother, especially with other project management tools. However, the overall experience is great Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

TestPad enables high-impact exploratory testing and test suite creation in parallel, with minimal effort. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'm a huge integration nerd ... wish there was an API available for TestPad Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Testpad is just userfriendly and it's easy to use and to accesss. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't think I dislike anything about Testpad Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of implementation- that is the best feature Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

i think the customer support needs improvement. Like it needs to be quick and prompt. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's a good tool for manual testing. Tests can be written very easily and it makes it very easy to pass tests on to other, even non-technical, coworkers so that they can complete them too. Great for testing new features, Bugs and especially regression-testing. Test reports can also be shared publicly, so there's no need to create accounts for customers to be able to see the tests results.

One of the most useful features is the ability to tag test steps to only make them available for specific test runs, eg making certain steps only available to test runs for mobile devices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Unfortunately the interface gets in the way more often than not. The developers insist on overwriting your browser's right-click function, which is something I strongly dislike in Webapps. If a Webapp runs in a browser, it should allow native browser functionality. It feels very strongly as if they wanted to write a Desktop App, but had to settle for a Webapp instead.

Lots of small things are way more difficult/cumbersome than they should be, such as editing test steps after completing a testrun (eg adding comments to explain the problem) requires you to first change the testrun's status to "In Progress" (the bar you need to click on to do so is very flashy, but simultaneously confusing and not user friendly at all). When editing a test step in a completed run you have to be careful to press escape instead of the big green and Red Pass and Fail buttons, otherwise it changes your testrun's status back to "completed", which is an annoyance when you want to edit multiple test steps. Or having to manually uncheck "Inherit Test Results" when starting a new test run (this should really be opt-in by default, not opt-out).

These things sound like small annoyances, but many such small annoyances lead to a very counter-intuitive interface. For a tool that should be very simple, we lose way too much time trying to explain to new employees how to work with it. I still get confused with its interface from time to time, and I've been using it for more than a year.

Had it been up to me, I would not use this tool. I find the user interface one of the most infuriating I have to work with on a regular basis. I strongly recommend that the developers reconsider their interface in terms of simplicity and predictability. Good user interface design is one of the most important things to keep in mind when designing a tool like this and I feel like that didn't get nearly enough attention during the development of Testpad. This is exactly why designing according to KISS principles is so important. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.