TeamCity Pros and Cons

It supports .net framework and is exceptionally reliable tool for freshers entering devops, you can run it on any operating system.

Integrates with build/test tools seamlessly and keeps a record of history.

Multiple Integrations with 3rd Party Applications like :

JIRA - To tack and report issues

Visual studio - In enabling developers to start programming quickly.

Docker- To automatically create containers Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

API integration documentation

Cost is high

Resource usage is also high

User interface can be improved

Learning curve can be complex especially when you don't have support within your team.

Customer support Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. It gives us an opportunity for continuous integration of UNIT CASES

2. It gives us an opportunity for continuous DEVELOPMENT of UNIT CASES

3. It gives us an opportunity TO RUN OUR SYSTEM INTEGRATION TEST in pipeline using automation

4. It gives us an opportunity to run on a scheduler

5. It gives us an opportunity to get integrate with GITLAB or application like postman/ Intellij/ Eclipse

6. Easy implementation,not much complex

7. I am using it daily in my career as I am SDET Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't think we have any as such drawback as it fullfill the purpose Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- Ability to automate everything possible using their scripting and different plugins

- Easy to install and configure

- It also supports a wide range of build tools and version control systems

- Provides extensive reporting and analytics

- Excellent support and active community

- Support with docker and Kubernetes

- Different level of user access management which ensures the good level of security Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- It is not easy to start with for beginners. The learning curve is steep

- Pricing can be relatively high for larger teams or organizations

- Can be resource-intensive, requiring dedicated hardware or powerful servers

- Bit of outdated UI

- Sometimes build server takes too much time to load Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- Integrated with majority of the unit test frameworks

- Supports multi-step build/deployment process

- It helps in detecting code build/test related issues early in SDLC

- TeamCity helps in faster delivery of the software products through automated build, deploy and test cycles Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- It's a licenced product (paid)

- Many times the application build fails without any particular reason which becomes challenging to debug

- Random build failures and build timeouts Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy integration with various tools and services, fast response rate, detailed logs availability to troubleshoot any issues, and meticulous build results with automated email and notifications are convenient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lack of enough documentation hinders initial setup; lots of features are in the experimental stage, very few plugins compared to other peers, and compulsory upgrades, which sometimes impact the ongoing work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

TeamCity has one of the best User-friendly interface. Most of my project's CI/CD pipelines are implemented using TeamCity and I can say configuring build steps or parameters are super easy in TeamCity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would definitely suggest TeamCity to provide free plan just like Gitlab, Even though they provide free trial period but free plan with basic features like build steps would be more beneficial. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

TeamCity is a tool for CI-CD, and it's possible to manage your pipeline step by step. You can integrate your remote repo and run any command in it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The log interface is unreadable, and it's hard to read and understand the output if it is long. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Best for deploying you automated test suite and executing the scenarios and generating reports Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Need to take care of all the configuration Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’ve been using Continuous Integration Servers for over a decade. I used Jenkins, Bamboo, Travis, tried Circle, Jenkins, GOCD, Semaphore and BuildBot. I take testing and continuous deployment very seriously and have strong demands to my build server. I ran a self hosted bamboo for more than 4 years, integrated with Jira and Bitbucket server and was satisfied, not happy.

… that I would be in LOVE with a continuous integration server ever again. Jetbrains, do something for your image. You deserve to be the king of CI-Servers, seriously. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dockerzing it was a little bit complex, but can be done, too.

I am missing some plugins from time to time, but overall I am very satisfied.

Nothing much that I really dislike! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of use as a user. Beautiful interface. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Difficult to use without understanding what it's purpose is. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.