Top Rated SkyCiv Structural 3D Alternatives
15 SkyCiv Structural 3D Reviews
I am using the software to investigate the behavior of a construction given various elements to build it with. It is really easy to learn and you can use the built-in templates or make your own. It also allows the use of plates that can be meshed giving you a glimpse of FEA. The one thing that is outstanding is their service. Extremely helpful and going far beyond what you would expect in this day and age. I actually had one of the developers assist me, even making some drawings for me. I never had that happen with any software support and I can wholeheartedly recommend it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Density should be in ISO units, i.e. g/cm3 or ton/m3 not kg/m3 Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
For a once-in-a-while user like me, SkyCiv combine ease of use with affordable pay-per-use. Ten minutes learning, ten minutes test model and you get your first results, clearly presented with color code on 3D rendered visualization. Amazing.
Company is young and support is fast and willing both to help and get feedback. They did returned and asked about my feedback, looking to implement what's appropriate. Being cloud based software, you do not need to maintain the software, always working with the latest version. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
When things gets more complex, you have limited set of modeling tools. However, the SW is evolving and the team responsive to feedback. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The incredible ease of use and striking intellect of the entire staff and their associates world wide. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
That the software is so easy to use that I regret all of the massively expensive software I've ever bought. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
1.The concept of cloud based engineering software makes the same files available to our colleagues instantly, and no time is wasted in sharing through hard disks or pen drives.
2.The software is pretty user friendly. The user interface is pretty good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
1.There are no preset models. If they incorporate preset models like that of scissor lifts, etc.., then it will be able to reach out to a large audience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Nothing beats this for quick analysis. I use the beam product for machine structure. I can quickly get answers to beam problems and document my answers. If I need to do more for PE reasons, it gives me the equations used for the model. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I wish it had a lookup for standard structural sections (I-beams, Channels, and Tubing) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
