
We were able to eliminate waiting times at the end of each sprint (which were usually very challenging as we deploy a lot of changes on a last day) with automatic CI scaling. All previous solutions were operating on fixed computing resources and we ended up wasting development time while developers were waiting for their build to finish. With Semaphore this is no longer the case - tests are run immediately after code has been pushed.
Another benefit was more powerful machines resulting in faster test runs, we have found out that in our case difference between CircleCI and SemaphoreCI was about 20% faster test runs.
With all that being said we are now paying 38% of what we would be paying somewhere else and experience is great.
Customer service is top-notch and we were never had a problem with resolving our problems in a short amount of time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
- Tests runs were not evenly split based on a test run time and we have had to rely Knapsack on our test distribution
- Getting non tech savy person to manage billing is challenging as it is required to setup a Github account in order to log in and manage projects
- Their target group are developers and it makes hard to sell project to any business person. Almost all materials are about development, I haven't seen any meaningful material on why you should consider using Semaphore instead of Azure Pipelines/AWS CodePipeline/ Jenkins. And what business will get from their faster build times
- Marketing materials are not updated to match current product shape and instead feature outdated "pipeline" screenshots - this is not looking very professional. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Semaphore CI makes it incredibly easy to get started. With zero prior experience on the platform, I was able to spin up a working pipeline to build and test my service in no time. Their "Getting Started" flow is one of the best I've seen — it's clear, structured, and genuinely helps you get up to speed fast. Integrating Semaphore into my existing repositories and services was seamless. I now use Semaphore daily as part of my customer's regular development workflow, and slowly migrating their pipelines over from another CI/CD provider. On top of that, the support team deserves a massive shoutout. They’ve consistently responded within 24 hours and always offer actionable solutions. It’s hands-down some of the best support I’ve ever received from a tech company. Their free tier is also incredibly generous compared to other CI/CD platforms — perfect for testing out the service or running smaller projects without a financial commitment. I've already recommended Semaphore to others and plan to use it on more projects in the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Honestly, there’s very little to complain about. The only minor challenge I had was adjusting to their build script format, which is a bit different from what I’m used to. But it’s not a big issue — the visual pipeline builder really helps smooth out that learning curve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The accessibility and flexibility of configuring our Semaphore instances helped us reduce our CI/CD pipelines to under 10 minutes on average. Also, a shout out to the support team - the support team is always very forthcoming and quick to respond. Generally very happy with Semaphore as our CI/CD provider. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There are occasional hiccups with the agents responding slowly and the occasional outage - but these usually get resolved really quickly by the team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What I like about Semaphore is that it’s an independent European company with its own data centers. The bare metal servers deliver excellent performance, cutting our times in half, which shortens our feedback loop and significantly improves developer productivity. Also reduces costs by 2 as we need half the time to run CI ! The new flaky test detection tool is also very useful, and their pricing remains highly competitive compared to other providers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Like many other CI solutions, YAML configuration can sometimes seem complex despite the graphical editor added in recent years. The documentation is very comprehensive but can feel endless due to the platform’s almost limitless possibilities. I’ve had to contact support two or three times over the past five years for specific configuration questions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It's cheap, it's easy to understand and the suppport team is quick to assist if you need help. We've previously used CircleCI which we found to be the opposite of all these. The UI is also modern and you easily get to what you want. The deployments feature is something I've been searching long and hard for, but haven't found anything else without severely impacting simplicity/ease-of-use. We use Semaphore CI every day, and perform 10+ releases a day to our environments and we have not had any problems yet. It was also very easy to get started as we just connected our GitHub Org, imported the relevant users and got to work on the pipeline files. That step was also a lot easier thanks to the graphical interface which guides you a little bit while you're getting used to the format. Honestly after trying GitHub Actions, CircleCI, Octopus, Jenkins, and more, this clearly stands out to me as the better option. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I wish the UI would be a little bit faster at times. And that the dynamic template resolution step when you use deployment parameters was a little faster. We're trying to squeeze every bit of performance out of our CI and losing 10 seconds to this is a little frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The product integrates well into our CI/CD setup. The web UI stays out of your way and you can resort to CLI for everything you might need (besides analytics, I think). The ability to spin up the environments and ssh into it to debug potential issues makes it easy to spot issues. The documentation is fine, and above all - their support is human, swift and reliable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
A feature that is in the pipeline (afaik) is to rerun indivdual steps instead of a whole workflow. This is obviously tricky (need to reset artifacts and cache etc) but would save some time on long flaky ci runs (that you should not have, but ... probably have). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The best thing I like is the support that's always polite and helpful. It offers a lot features that are handy for a developer like me. Integrating these features into our processes works really good most of the time! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Sometimes, I find it difficult to navigate through the documentation since there's a lot and it's not particularly within my field of work. Nonetheless, this does not happen often and the customer support is always there to help! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Semaphore was easy to get started with and is one of the lower priced CI/CD platforms. When I need access to beta features or my usage triggered abuse detection, support was quick to respond and helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Semaphore doesn't offer large machine types currently, and Linux ARM (which I needed) was in closed beta. They let me into the beta, but it took several days because their support is on European business hours and I'm in the US. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Semaphore is an incredibly easy to use CI/CD platform. Integrating my Ruby on Rails applications to use it is always very easy to do.
Their platform has an incredibly good looking UI, and documentation is also very well written.
What makes Semaphore stand out from the crowd however is their customer support.
At one point at my current company we had some issue with our organization management; we contacted their customer care and they literally answered our email in 2 minutes and the problem was fixed in less than 1 5 minutes.
It can't get any better than this! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Sometimes they are slow to update the programming language versions in their OS images.
At one point the bump of a minor Ruby version took almost a week in their Ubuntu image and we couldn't upgrade our app without having the CI with the exact same Ruby version.
Also, lately they had some sort of bug in their platform that caused you to log out from Semaphore every day, and you thus you needed to log in back every morning. That was frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I think SemaphoreCI is a great way to supervise CI/CD workflows. What is very useful for me is the SSH debugging feature helping with troubleshooting pipelines.
As well, the parameterized promotions make it easy to customize deployments, especially when working with multiple environments.
A good tool is also the test result reporting because it makes it easier to identify and address issues quickly which help a lot. In addition, I appreciate how fast are the pipelines and how the YAML configuration is useful to strikes a good balance between simplicity and flexibility! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Semaphore depends a lot on shell commands, which, I think might feel uncomfortable or intimidating to those new to scripting. Thus, I would say Semaphore is way more geared toward users who are already comfortable with the command line.
Also, I miss native integration with tools like Terraform or Pulumi. I believe they would be a nice addition for the one who are a lot invested in infrastructure-as-code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Semaphore is cost effective and easy to configure. Any time that we need support, we usually have a response within minutes and a resolution within a day. Plus, there are easy to use debug tools so we can dive into any problems we may have. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There aren't many downsides to Semaphore other than just the general frustration that dealing with CI can sometimes be. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.