SAP Fieldglass Reviews & Product Details

What I like best about SAP Fieldglass is its user-friendly interface and ability to streamline the management of external workers and contingent workforce processes. It helps keep information organized, improves visibility across different stages of the workforce lifecycle, and makes it easier to manage approvals, documentation, and compliance in one centralized platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform can sometimes feel complex to navigate, and certain processes require multiple steps or clicks. Some features could be more intuitive, with a simpler interface and faster navigation to improve the overall user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The tool is very good anyone and hover over the SAP fieldglass and can understand the option available. The interface quite interactive and look and fill and ease to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometime it's not able to login due to I guess server issue, so my suggestion would be please work on interface so that it will work fast and seamless. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to find active requisitions and submitting profiles against same. Tracking and sending updates to hiring manager/Team is very easy and coinvent . Also feature to Integrate with ATS is amazing option. I use this tool daily for my client hiring needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing as such. It’s good to use, and I’d recommend it to everyone. Sometimes it responds very slowly, though—maybe it’s a server issue or something; I’m not really sure.

Nothing as such. It’s good to use, and I’d recommend it to everyone. Sometimes it responds very slowly, though—maybe it’s a server issue or something; I’m not really sure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I feel that SAP Fieldglass has the coolest interface among other VMS tools. It consolidates everything in one place, making managing vendors, workers, and approvals much more organized compared to doing it manually or using different tools. The visibility feature really stands out, allowing me to see what's happening in real time with timecards, approvals, and worker status, which reduces confusion and follow-ups. The structure of the workflow is quite streamlined, saving time especially during approvals, as I can easily track where things are stuck and who needs to take action. The initial setup is relatively easy, and I appreciate having all the details in one tool, which eases invoicing issues and vendor onboarding. It helps manage integrations from SAP to SAP HR efficiently, with all data centralized, supported by smooth graphics. It's overall a great tool that has significantly simplified day-to-day work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes, SAP Fieldglass has glitches like when a supplier was not getting the timecard and rate option while submitting a worker to SOW, which required us to create a ticket to resolve it. Another thing is the reporting time; exporting a big report takes a lot of time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What stands out most about SAP Fieldglass is how effectively it brings visibility and control to external workforce management in one place. It simplifies what’s usually a messy process—tracking contractors, service providers, and spend—by centralizing everything into a single platform.

A big advantage is its real-time insights. You can quickly see who’s working, what they’re costing, and how that aligns with budgets, which makes decision-making much more data-driven. It also helps enforce compliance and standardize processes across regions and vendors, something that’s otherwise hard to maintain at scale.

Another strong point is automation. Routine tasks like onboarding vendors, managing contracts, and processing invoices become much more streamlined, reducing manual work and the risk of errors.

If you want a concise answer for a form, you could say something like:

“I like SAP Fieldglass most for its ability to provide real-time visibility and control over external workforce and vendor spend, while streamlining processes through automation and ensuring compliance across the organization.” Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One downside of SAP Fieldglass is its complexity and less intuitive user interface, which can make onboarding and daily use more challenging. It can also require significant effort to configure and integrate with other systems Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Instead of juggling spreadsheets, emails, and multiple vendors, everything sits in one centralized platform. That means you can track contractors, freelancers, and service providers in real time—who they are, what they’re working on, how much they cost, and whether they’re compliant. That level of transparency is a big deal for both finance and HR teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the biggest complaints is the interface. It feels dated and not very intuitive, especially for occasional users like hiring managers or contractors. Simple tasks—like submitting time or approving invoices—can take more clicks than they should, and the learning curve can be steeper than expected.

Another issue is implementation and configuration. Fieldglass is highly customizable, which sounds great until you realize it often requires significant setup effort, consulting support, and ongoing admin work. If it’s not configured well from the start, workflows can become overly complicated and frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find SAP Fieldglass very helpful for managing freelancers, as it simplifies tasks that were tough when done manually. I particularly like how easy it is to manage tax and labor laws, which is crucial for me since I have workers from different regions. It makes those tasks manageable, whereas I couldn't track them manually. Also, I found the initial setup and guidance to be pretty easy, even for someone not into tech. Everything about the platform feels fine to me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is mostly used for contractors and if I make them as full-time employees then I am not able to manage them properly. Providing dedicated structure to manage full-time employees or long-term employees as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that I can see invoices and timecards directly in the portal. Being able to pull timeclock punches in the portal helps me pay my employee on a timely basis, without waiting for the onsite manager to send them to me. Pulling invoices directly from the portal helps with time efficiency, instead of waiting for the onsite manager to send to me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI is very techy, meaning some of my colleagues have difficulty navigating it. The help section of the portal is so extensive, that if you ask for support in one thing, you'll have to read multiple help 'articles' which takes time and the articles are lengthy. It makes no sense, a work order is typically work ordered that needs to be completed. It sounds like they are just using fancy words. Not easy at all. As we were invited to use this as an outside vendor, we received no training. Again, we have to go to the help section and read dozens of pages just to understand simple functions in the system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how SAP Fieldglass centralizes vendor and contingent workforce management in one platform. Features like time submission, approvals, invoicing, and vendor data management make daily operations much more efficient. The workflow automation reduces manual effort, improves transparency, and ensures better compliance. I appreciate how smoothly it integrates with other solutions from SAP, which helps with reporting, tracking, and overall system visibility. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area that could be improved in SAP Fieldglass is the user interface and navigation, which can sometimes feel complex and require multiple steps to complete simple tasks. The reporting and customization options could also be more flexible and user-friendly. Improving performance and providing more intuitive dashboards would make the overall experience even better, especially when integrating with other solutions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I definitely like the integration with the SAP ERP, which gives finance and procurement teams real-time visibility into spend, making budget tracking and compliance much easier. The approval workflows are also promising as they help in customizing and reducing a lot of back and forth that typically happens over email. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are a few things that I notice. Initially, I see there is a huge learning curve. Whenever a new user onboards the platform, it struggles with the UI, which feels dated compared to modern SaaS tools. The training takes time, and the documentation could be more intuitive so that it is more engaging for those using the software. Some configuration changes also require support tickets rather than self-service, which can slow things down. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.