# Top 10 SAP Management of Change Alternatives & Competitors **Average Rating:** 4.1/5 **Total Number of Reviews:** 17 If you are considering SAP Management of Change, you may also want to investigate similar alternatives or competitors to find the best solution. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to SAP Management of Change include features. The best overall SAP Management of Change alternative is Microsoft Purview Records Management. Other similar apps like SAP Management of Change are Kadince, SAS Model Risk Management, Communication Compliance, and iManage Records Manager. SAP Management of Change alternatives can be found in [Other GRC Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-grc-tools). ## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to SAP Management of Change - [Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-purview-records-management/reviews) - [Kadince](https://www.g2.com/products/kadince/reviews) - [SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/products/sas-model-risk-management/reviews) - [Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-communication-compliance/reviews) - [iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/products/imanage-imanage-records-manager/reviews) - [SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/products/sammy/reviews) - [X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/products/x-analytics/reviews) - [Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/products/verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution/reviews) - [Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/products/activ-advanced/reviews) - [PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/products/ptc-implementer/reviews) ## Top 10 Alternatives to SAP Management of Change Recently Reviewed By G2 Community Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how SAP Management of Change stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Automotive, Industrial Automation, and Staffing and Recruiting, and find the best product for your business. ### 1. [Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-purview-records-management/reviews) By Microsoft **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 40 Microsoft Purview Records Management is a comprehensive solution designed to help organizations manage their regulatory, legal, and business-critical records within the Microsoft 365 environment. By leveraging this system, organizations can meet legal obligations, demonstrate compliance with regulations, and enhance operational efficiency through the systematic disposition of items that are no longer required. Key Features and Functionality: - Retention Labels: Create and configure retention labels to mark items as records. These labels can be applied manually by users or automatically based on specific criteria such as sensitive information, keywords, or content types. - File Plan Management: Develop and manage a file plan to organize retention labels, allowing for the import of existing retention plans or the creation of new ones to meet organizational requirements. - Event-Based Retention: Initiate retention periods based on specific events, ensuring that records are retained for the appropriate duration following significant occurrences. - Disposition Reviews: Implement disposition reviews to validate and approve the deletion of records at the end of their retention periods, providing proof of disposition and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. - Automated Classification: Utilize automated policies to classify and govern data at scale based on file properties, the presence of sensitive data, or machine learning, reducing manual effort and enhancing accuracy. Primary Value and Problem Solved: Microsoft Purview Records Management addresses the critical need for organizations to systematically manage their records throughout their lifecycle. By providing tools for labeling, classifying, retaining, and disposing of records, it ensures that organizations can comply with legal and regulatory requirements, mitigate risks associated with data retention, and improve operational efficiency. The solution's automated features reduce manual workload, minimize human error, and provide a defensible process for records management, thereby enhancing overall data governance and compliance posture. Reviewers say compared to SAP Management of Change, Microsoft Purview Records Management is: - Easier to set up - Better at meeting requirements - More usable Categories in common with SAP Management of Change: [Other GRC Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-grc-tools) **Compare:** [SAP Management of Change vs Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-sap-management-of-change) **Compare Microsoft Purview Records Management with other alternatives:** - [Microsoft Purview Records Management vs Kadince](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-microsoft-purview-records-management) - [Microsoft Purview Records Management vs SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-sas-model-risk-management) - [Microsoft Purview Records Management vs Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-microsoft-purview-records-management) - [Microsoft Purview Records Management vs iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [Microsoft Purview Records Management vs SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-sammy) - [Microsoft Purview Records Management vs X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-x-analytics) - [Microsoft Purview Records Management vs Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [Microsoft Purview Records Management vs Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-microsoft-purview-records-management) - [Microsoft Purview Records Management vs PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-ptc-implementer) ### 2. [Kadince](https://www.g2.com/products/kadince/reviews) By Kadince **Average Rating:** 5.0/5 **Total Reviews:** 44 For over a decade, Kadince software has been helping bank and credit union professionals track and manage their community involvement and compliance data. Managing this data via spreadsheets, PDFs, and emails is manual and time-consuming. Instead of relying on outdated methods, Kadince users love keeping everything in one place. From donations/sponsorships, volunteer hours, events, loans, investments, complaints, marketing projects, and compliance approvals, Kadince helps you track it all. Reviewers say compared to SAP Management of Change, Kadince is: - Easier to set up - Better at meeting requirements - More usable Categories in common with SAP Management of Change: [Other GRC Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-grc-tools) **Compare:** [SAP Management of Change vs Kadince](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-sap-management-of-change) **Compare Kadince with other alternatives:** - [Kadince vs Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-microsoft-purview-records-management) - [Kadince vs SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-sas-model-risk-management) - [Kadince vs Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-kadince) - [Kadince vs iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [Kadince vs SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-sammy) - [Kadince vs X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-x-analytics) - [Kadince vs Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [Kadince vs Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-kadince) - [Kadince vs PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-ptc-implementer) ### 3. [SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/products/sas-model-risk-management/reviews) By SAS Institute Inc. **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 12 Get clear, enterprise-level oversight throughout the model life cycle. Keep executive management and regulators up-to-date on model status across all risk categories. And gain valuable insight for making precise risk-reward decisions. SAS offers a complete model risk management solution that includes a centralized model inventory and model assessment capabilities. Reviewers say compared to SAP Management of Change, SAS Model Risk Management is: - Easier to set up - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with SAP Management of Change: [Other GRC Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-grc-tools) **Compare:** [SAP Management of Change vs SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/sap-management-of-change-vs-sas-model-risk-management) **Compare SAS Model Risk Management with other alternatives:** - [SAS Model Risk Management vs Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-sas-model-risk-management) - [SAS Model Risk Management vs Kadince](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-sas-model-risk-management) - [SAS Model Risk Management vs Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-sas-model-risk-management) - [SAS Model Risk Management vs iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/compare/sas-model-risk-management-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [SAS Model Risk Management vs SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/compare/sammy-vs-sas-model-risk-management) - [SAS Model Risk Management vs X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/compare/sas-model-risk-management-vs-x-analytics) - [SAS Model Risk Management vs Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/compare/sas-model-risk-management-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [SAS Model Risk Management vs Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-sas-model-risk-management) - [SAS Model Risk Management vs PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/compare/ptc-implementer-vs-sas-model-risk-management) ### 4. [Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-communication-compliance/reviews) By Microsoft **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 12 Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance is a comprehensive solution designed to help organizations detect, capture, and remediate potentially inappropriate communications across various channels, including email, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Viva Engage, and third-party platforms. By leveraging predefined and customizable policies, it enables organizations to monitor internal and external communications for regulatory compliance violations, such as sharing sensitive information, harassing language, or adult content. Built with privacy at its core, the solution ensures user anonymity through pseudonymization, incorporates role-based access controls, and maintains detailed audit logs to uphold user privacy. Key Features and Functionality: - Multi-Channel Monitoring: Supports surveillance of communications across email, Microsoft Teams, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Viva Engage, and various third-party platforms. - Customizable Policies: Offers both predefined and user-defined policies to detect specific compliance violations tailored to organizational needs. - Privacy-Centric Design: Ensures user anonymity through pseudonymization, implements role-based access controls, and maintains comprehensive audit logs to protect user privacy. - Flexible Remediation Workflows: Provides workflows to quickly address violations, including the ability to remove inappropriate messages from Microsoft Teams. - Integration with Other Tools: Seamlessly integrates with Microsoft Insider Risk Management, Power Automate, and Data Loss Prevention solutions to enhance compliance and risk management strategies. Primary Value and Problem Solved: Communication Compliance addresses the critical need for organizations to monitor and manage communication risks effectively. By detecting and mitigating regulatory compliance violations and business conduct issues, it helps organizations maintain a safe and compliant communication environment. This proactive approach not only reduces the risk of regulatory fines and legal repercussions but also fosters a positive corporate culture by ensuring that all communications adhere to established policies and standards. Reviewers say compared to SAP Management of Change, Communication Compliance is: - Easier to set up - More usable - Better at support Categories in common with SAP Management of Change: [Other GRC Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-grc-tools) **Compare:** [SAP Management of Change vs Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-sap-management-of-change) **Compare Communication Compliance with other alternatives:** - [Communication Compliance vs Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-microsoft-purview-records-management) - [Communication Compliance vs Kadince](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-kadince) - [Communication Compliance vs SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-sas-model-risk-management) - [Communication Compliance vs iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [Communication Compliance vs SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-sammy) - [Communication Compliance vs X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-x-analytics) - [Communication Compliance vs Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [Communication Compliance vs Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-microsoft-communication-compliance) - [Communication Compliance vs PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-ptc-implementer) ### 5. [iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/products/imanage-imanage-records-manager/reviews) By iManage **Average Rating:** 4.1/5 **Total Reviews:** 11 iManage Records Manager is a comprehensive solution designed to centralize the governance of both physical and electronic records within an organization. By providing a unified interface, it enables administrators to set and enforce governance policies, including retention periods and disposition rules, across multiple repositories. This centralized approach ensures consistent application of policies, enhances compliance with evolving regulatory requirements, and reduces risks associated with data exposure. Additionally, by retaining only necessary records, organizations can significantly reduce storage costs. The system's intuitive approval workflows empower staff to make informed decisions regarding record retention and disposal, thereby streamlining records management processes without adding undue burden to users. Key Features and Functionality: - Unified Governance: Centralizes the management of all electronic and physical content, improving visibility and control across the organization. - Integrity and Confidentiality: Minimizes the risk of data exposure by enforcing consistent retention and disposition rules that align with governance policies. - Cost Reduction: Decreases storage costs by retaining only necessary records, eliminating unnecessary data retention. - Compliance Assurance: Aligns document and records management practices with evolving regulatory compliance requirements, ensuring adherence to industry standards. - User Approvals: Empowers staff to decide which records to retain or dispose of through consistent, intuitive approval workflows. - Enhanced Protection: Applies need-to-know access policies to sensitive documents via integration with iManage Security Policy Manager, bolstering data security. - Single Policy Control: Defines and applies a single policy to records stored across multiple repositories, eliminating the need for separate policies for each system. - Role-Specific Dashboards: Provides user-based or privilege-based interfaces with customized views of key metrics, tailoring real-time insights into records management operations to users' needs. - Centralized Management: Governs content in place, whether physical records located in offices or offsite, or electronic records across multiple repositories, such as iManage Work and Windows file shares. Primary Value and Problem Solved: iManage Records Manager addresses the critical need for organizations to effectively manage and govern their records amidst a rapidly changing regulatory environment. By centralizing records management, it enhances visibility and control over all content, ensuring consistent application of governance policies. This not only minimizes risks associated with data exposure and non-compliance but also reduces storage costs by eliminating unnecessary data retention. The system's intuitive workflows and role-specific dashboards empower users to make informed decisions, thereby streamlining records management processes and enhancing overall organizational efficiency. Reviewers say compared to SAP Management of Change, iManage Records Manager is: - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with SAP Management of Change: [Other GRC Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-grc-tools) **Compare:** [SAP Management of Change vs iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/compare/sap-management-of-change-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) **Compare iManage Records Manager with other alternatives:** - [iManage Records Manager vs Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [iManage Records Manager vs Kadince](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [iManage Records Manager vs SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/sas-model-risk-management-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [iManage Records Manager vs Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [iManage Records Manager vs SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/compare/sammy-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [iManage Records Manager vs X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/compare/x-analytics-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [iManage Records Manager vs Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/compare/verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [iManage Records Manager vs Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [iManage Records Manager vs PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/compare/ptc-implementer-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) ### 6. [SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/products/sammy/reviews) By Codific **Average Rating:** 4.9/5 **Total Reviews:** 6 SAMMY is a unified platform that helps you translate frameworks into clear, measurable actions. Assess where you stand, create smart improvement plans, and demonstrate progress with actionable dashboards — all in one unified platform. Reviewers say compared to SAP Management of Change, SAMMY is: - Easier to set up - Better at support - More usable Categories in common with SAP Management of Change: [Other GRC Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-grc-tools) **Compare:** [SAP Management of Change vs SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/compare/sammy-vs-sap-management-of-change) **Compare SAMMY with other alternatives:** - [SAMMY vs Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-sammy) - [SAMMY vs Kadince](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-sammy) - [SAMMY vs SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/sammy-vs-sas-model-risk-management) - [SAMMY vs Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-sammy) - [SAMMY vs iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/compare/sammy-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [SAMMY vs X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/compare/sammy-vs-x-analytics) - [SAMMY vs Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/compare/sammy-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [SAMMY vs Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-sammy) - [SAMMY vs PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/compare/ptc-implementer-vs-sammy) ### 7. [X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/products/x-analytics/reviews) By X-Analytics **Average Rating:** 5.0/5 **Total Reviews:** 6 X-Analytics is a SaaS platform specializing in helping organizations understand, manage, and communicate cyber risk in clear business terms. By revealing exposure, prioritizing actions, and showing the value of cybersecurity strategies, X-Analytics empowers leaders to make smarter, business-aligned decisions. Used by more than 1,000 organizations worldwide across industries such as Aviation, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Private Equity, and Technology. X-Analytics brings together solutions like CRI 2.0 and Cyber GRC to turn complex data into actionable insights and optimize cybersecurity investments. The platform is built for corporate directors, CEOs, CFOs, CIOs, CISOs, and risk teams seeking a unified, informed, and financially grounded approach to cyber risk management. Reviewers say compared to SAP Management of Change, X-Analytics is: - Easier to set up - Better at meeting requirements - More usable Categories in common with SAP Management of Change: [Other GRC Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-grc-tools) **Compare:** [SAP Management of Change vs X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/compare/sap-management-of-change-vs-x-analytics) **Compare X-Analytics with other alternatives:** - [X-Analytics vs Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-x-analytics) - [X-Analytics vs Kadince](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-x-analytics) - [X-Analytics vs SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/sas-model-risk-management-vs-x-analytics) - [X-Analytics vs Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-x-analytics) - [X-Analytics vs iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/compare/x-analytics-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [X-Analytics vs SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/compare/sammy-vs-x-analytics) - [X-Analytics vs Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/compare/verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution-vs-x-analytics) - [X-Analytics vs Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-x-analytics) - [X-Analytics vs PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/compare/ptc-implementer-vs-x-analytics) ### 8. [Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/products/verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution/reviews) By Verizon Connect **Average Rating:** 2.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 6 Simple compliance for complex regulations. Verizon Connect compliance management software keeps pace with changing government regulations and gives you peace of mind that your fleet is operating safely and lawfully. It makes monitoring your drivers and vehicles easier, allowing you to focus on other aspects of your business. Categories in common with SAP Management of Change: [Other GRC Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-grc-tools) **Compare:** [SAP Management of Change vs Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/compare/sap-management-of-change-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) **Compare Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution with other alternatives:** - [Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution vs Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution vs Kadince](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution vs SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/sas-model-risk-management-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution vs Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution vs iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/compare/verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution vs SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/compare/sammy-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution vs X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/compare/verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution-vs-x-analytics) - [Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution vs Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution vs PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/compare/ptc-implementer-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) ### 9. [Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/products/activ-advanced/reviews) By MyActiv Limited **Average Rating:** 4.8/5 **Total Reviews:** 5 Activ Select is a modular suite of ISO management software tools tailored to meet a specific ISO compliance challenge or work together as a complete, fully comprehensive ISO management system. Every organisation is different and ISO compliance needs can vary, therefore Activ Select has been designed to deliver flexible, fully configurable ISO management systems tailored to an organisation’s needs. That means you can optimise your management system for effective ISO certification by creating a bespoke Activ system that prioritises your certification and compliance needs. Activ Select offers a wide range of modules that combine into a powerful, comprehensive system. Our professional ISO management system team works in partnership with your organisation, matching your needs to build a tailored system that helps you achieve and maintain ISO certification. Any combination of modules can be ordered, additional modules can also be added at a later date, should your circumstances and requirements change. Activ Select – ISO Management System Modules ISO Certification Manager - Build an ISO compliant management system with a set of document and process templates. A simple project management plan ensures audit-readiness. Processes - Maximise efficiency with clearly mapped, consistently implemented processes. Create an all-encompassing and accessible business operating manual. File Manager - Solve the familiar problem of enabling users to locate the documents they need, whilst controlling access to sensitive information. Improvement Log - Achieve continuous improvement with accountable management of all problems and improvement opportunities. Business Risk Manager - Conduct a high level business risk assessment in a simple, structured way. Record risks, opportunities and associated controls. Assign actions. Legal Compliance Manager - Automatically create and maintain your legal register. Review your legal compliance. Stay up to date with relevant legislation changes. Information Security Risk Manager - Information security, data protection and business compliance supporting ISO 27001. Create effective risk-management workflows with real-time reporting, extensive policy and procedure templates, and data protection impact assessment. Create a real-time Statement of Applicability, access a Supplier Capability Assessment framework and deploy real-time reporting and escalation GDPR Compliance Manager - Protect personal data and ensure compliance with GDPR legislation. Audit Manager - Optimise internal auditing and routine checks. Ensure consistency with easy-to-use forms including auditor guidance and evidence capture features. Incident Log - Systematically record critical details of all incidents. Compile comprehensive investigation reports and track progress of assigned actions. Customer and Supplier Manager - Streamline customer and supplier relationship management with automated feedback and supplier approval processes HR Manager - Have a go-to place to expertly manage skills, training records and appraisals. Maintain all statutory employee records confidentially. Asset Manager - Catalogue your assets and maintain them efficiently with automated scheduling and supporting documentation Teams - For large organisations, separate information into teams so users only see information relevant to them. Agreements Manager - Catalogue, manage and assess your compliance against the ‘other requirements’ that your organisation is committed to. Assign responsibilities. Reviewers say compared to SAP Management of Change, Activ Advanced is: - More usable - Better at support - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with SAP Management of Change: [Other GRC Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-grc-tools) **Compare:** [SAP Management of Change vs Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-sap-management-of-change) **Compare Activ Advanced with other alternatives:** - [Activ Advanced vs Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-microsoft-purview-records-management) - [Activ Advanced vs Kadince](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-kadince) - [Activ Advanced vs SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-sas-model-risk-management) - [Activ Advanced vs Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-microsoft-communication-compliance) - [Activ Advanced vs iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [Activ Advanced vs SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-sammy) - [Activ Advanced vs X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-x-analytics) - [Activ Advanced vs Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [Activ Advanced vs PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-ptc-implementer) ### 10. [PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/products/ptc-implementer/reviews) By PTC **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 5 Providing developers and IT managers with an easy to use environment that speeds development by managing and streamlining critical change management and development processes. Categories in common with SAP Management of Change: [Other GRC Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/other-grc-tools) **Compare:** [SAP Management of Change vs PTC Implementer](https://www.g2.com/compare/ptc-implementer-vs-sap-management-of-change) **Compare PTC Implementer with other alternatives:** - [PTC Implementer vs Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-purview-records-management-vs-ptc-implementer) - [PTC Implementer vs Kadince](https://www.g2.com/compare/kadince-vs-ptc-implementer) - [PTC Implementer vs SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/ptc-implementer-vs-sas-model-risk-management) - [PTC Implementer vs Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/compare/microsoft-communication-compliance-vs-ptc-implementer) - [PTC Implementer vs iManage Records Manager](https://www.g2.com/compare/ptc-implementer-vs-imanage-imanage-records-manager) - [PTC Implementer vs SAMMY](https://www.g2.com/compare/ptc-implementer-vs-sammy) - [PTC Implementer vs X-Analytics](https://www.g2.com/compare/ptc-implementer-vs-x-analytics) - [PTC Implementer vs Verizon Connect GPS Asset Tracking Solution](https://www.g2.com/compare/ptc-implementer-vs-verizon-connect-gps-asset-tracking-solution) - [PTC Implementer vs Activ Advanced](https://www.g2.com/compare/activ-advanced-vs-ptc-implementer) --- ## SAP Management of Change Alternatives FAQs ### How does SAP Management of Change compare to Microsoft Purview Records...? According to G2 data, [SAP Management of Change](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-management-of-change/reviews) has an average rating of 4.1/5 from 17 reviews, while [Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-purview-records-management/reviews) holds a higher average rating of 4.3/5 from 40 reviews. In dimension scores, Microsoft Purview Records Management leads SAP Management of Change by 0.4 points in Meeting Requirements (8.6 vs 8.2) and by 0.1 points in Usability (8.1 vs 8.0). It also outperforms SAP in Ease of Setup by 2.0 points (7.7 vs 5.7) and Ease of Admin by 7.9 vs no comparable score for SAP. SAP Management of Change scores higher in Support by 0.6 points (8.9 vs 8.3) and in Ease of Doing Business With by 1.0 point (9.0 vs 8.0). User reviews for SAP Management of Change highlight strengths in efficiency improvement (6 mentions), ease of use (6 mentions), risk management (6 mentions), and audit management (3 mentions). Microsoft Purview Records Management reviews emphasize comprehensive compliance features, user-friendly interface, automated policies, and seamless integration with Microsoft 365. Overall, Microsoft Purview Records Management offers stronger compliance, integration, and ease of setup, while SAP Management of Change excels in support and business relationship. Microsoft Purview's broader adoption (40 reviews vs 17) and higher average rating reflect greater user satisfaction and feature completeness in records management and compliance contexts. ### What are the best alternatives to SAP Management of Change? [Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-purview-records-management/reviews) has a 4.3-star rating from 40 reviews, [Formalize](https://www.g2.com/products/formalize/reviews) has a 4.9-star rating from 37 reviews, [Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-communication-compliance/reviews) has a 4.5-star rating from 12 reviews, and [SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/products/sas-model-risk-management/reviews) has a 4.3-star rating from 12 reviews. These alternatives outperform SAP Management of Change (4.1 stars, 17 reviews) in dimensions such as ease of setup, usability, and meeting requirements. ### Which Other GRC Tools tools do reviewers recommend instead of SAP Management of Change? Reviewers recommend [Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-purview-records-management/reviews) for its user-friendly interface, automated classification, seamless integration with Microsoft 365, and comprehensive compliance features. [Formalize](https://www.g2.com/products/formalize/reviews) is praised for its intuitive platform, modularity, automation of compliance reporting, and outstanding customer support. [Communication Compliance](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-communication-compliance/reviews) is valued for its multi-channel monitoring, customizable policies, and privacy-centric design that helps detect and remediate inappropriate communications. [SAS Model Risk Management](https://www.g2.com/products/sas-model-risk-management/reviews) is recommended for its comprehensive model governance, automated monitoring, advanced analytics, and regulatory compliance capabilities. These tools provide enhanced usability, automation, and specialized compliance functionalities that reviewers find beneficial compared to SAP Management of Change. ### Why do users choose Microsoft Purview Records... over SAP Management of Change? Users choose [Microsoft Purview Records Management](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-purview-records-management/reviews) over SAP Management of Change primarily due to its superior ease of setup and administration, scoring 7.7 and 7.9 respectively compared to SAP's 5.7 in ease of setup and no comparable ease of admin score. Microsoft Purview's seamless integration with Microsoft 365 applications like SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams enables efficient records management and compliance automation, which users find valuable for reducing manual effort and ensuring regulatory adherence. Additionally, Microsoft Purview's automated labeling, retention policies, and centralized compliance features simplify governance and risk management, leading to higher user satisfaction reflected in its 4.3-star average rating from 40 reviews. Users also appreciate its scalability and security features, which support organizations of various sizes. Microsoft Purview's comprehensive compliance capabilities and integration advantages drive preference over SAP Management of Change, which users find more complex, costly, and time-consuming to implement and operate. ## Explore Articles - [Most reliable MDR software for IT companies](https://www.g2.com/discussions/most-reliable-mdr-software-for-it-companies-which-one-do-you-recommend) - [What is the best vulnerability scanning tool for enterprise IT teams?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-best-vulnerability-scanning-tool-for-enterprise-it-teams) - [Leading customer relationship tool for software companies](https://www.g2.com/discussions/leading-customer-relationship-tool-for-software-companies) - [What is the most affordable invoice management software for SMBs?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-most-affordable-invoice-management-software-for-smbs) - [What are the key challenges in implementing UKG systems and how do consulting partners help teams streamline the process?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-key-challenges-in-implementing-ukg-systems-and-how-do-consulting-partners-help-teams-streamline-the-process) - [Top platforms for measuring training program effectiveness](https://www.g2.com/discussions/top-platforms-for-measuring-training-program-effectiveness) ## Spotlight Categories - [Password Managers Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/password-managers) - [Contact Center Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/contact-center) - [Employer of Record (EOR) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/employer-of-record-eor)