SalesHive Reviews & Provider Details

Our assigned SDR began calling with the wrong company name on March 12. We reported it the following day. Separately, the calling script that was in use from March 11 through March 24 was built for the wrong CRM platform and did not align with our market, our service, or our stated ICP. Thirteen consecutive calling days ran on the wrong script before our team identified the issue and escalated it through multiple SalesHive contacts.

The single meeting SalesHive delivered during this period was with a Salesforce consultant employed by a Salesforce implementation partner, a company and role that fell outside our ICP by every criterion we provided. Minimal research would have disqualified this prospect before the call was ever made.

When we terminated and cited material breach, their CFO rejected the claim and referenced a 30-day cure period that does not match their own published contract terms (which specify 14 days). They offered to waive the following billing cycle but refused to refund any portion of the fees already paid. When we continued to press, they threatened to retract the waiver and pursue financial action. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We hired SalesHive to build a qualified outbound pipeline targeting a specific buyer profile. That did not happen. We received 13 days of misaligned outreach, one disqualified meeting, and an adversarial refund process. We asked about negative reviews before signing and were assured they reflected a previous team. Our experience was consistent with the pattern described in those reviews. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We hired SalesHive to run an outbound cold calling campaign targeting Salesforce-aligned B2B SaaS companies. We paid $7,000. We documented what followed carefully, because it became clear early on that we would need a record. Thirteen of the first twenty-two calling days were spent running the wrong script to the wrong audience. The script contained HubSpot terminology. Our campaign was explicitly Salesforce-focused. No pre-launch QA was conducted. No practice run was done before the SDR went live. Our team caught this ourselves and escalated it via Slack to multiple contacts including Mike Belmonte, Leah Halverson, and Patricia Bolfik. Corrections were made only after we forced the issue.

The SDR also used the wrong company name on calls for multiple consecutive days. Again - flagged by us, not caught internally.

The one meeting that was booked was with a Salesforce Consultant at a competitor firm. This is a competitor profile, not a prospect. It could have been disqualified in five minutes of basic research. It was presented to us as a qualified result. We also received AI-generated written deliverables containing Hindi character artifacts. These were submitted without human review. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.