I like that there's no licensing cost. I like the flexibility on tap. Overall with some technical familiarity you can deploy in [relative] confidence. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I dislike the steep learning curve, the lack of commercial support, and the finicky nature of the older, less mature versions. Centralized management is not really fleshed out, even though things like WebVirtMgr can be configured. Maintenance can be tricky. Migration from one host to another isn't very straightforward either. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Video Reviews
805 out of 806 Total Reviews for Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Overall Review Sentiment for Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Log in to view review sentiment.

It is a stable and secure operating system where you get updates very frequently to address security vulnerabilities. It is simply the core of all technologies.
Releases life cycles are very good and not short. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Maybe as end user, more GUI user friendly applications need to be added.
More ease of use for important security features like data encryption at rest.
Major Upgrade procedures need to be more straight forward and easier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is an outstanding operating system for enterprise environments, delivering unmatched stability, security, and long-term support. Its robust performance makes it ideal for mission-critical workloads, and the seamless integration with Red Hat’s ecosystem ensures reliability at every level. The extensive documentation, excellent customer support, and frequent security updates provide peace of mind for IT teams. Additionally, RHEL’s compatibility with a vast range of enterprise applications and cloud platforms makes it a top choice for businesses looking for a scalable and efficient Linux solution. Highly recommended for organizations that prioritize security, performance, and support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is a fantastic choice for businesses that need a stable, secure, and well-supported operating system. It offers top-notch reliability, excellent security features, and seamless integration with enterprise tools. However, one downside is the cost—RHEL’s subscription model can be expensive, especially for small businesses or individuals who need enterprise features but have budget constraints. Additionally, some users may find the strict licensing and lack of access to the latest cutting-edge software a bit limiting compared to community-driven distributions like Fedora or Ubuntu. Despite this, RHEL remains a solid investment for companies that prioritize long-term stability and professional support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
RHEL is a the best solution for real-life enterprise application. Its stability and security are unmatched, making it my go-to for mission-critical systems. I's really easy to use once you’re familiar with RPM-based ecosystems—tools like YUM/DNF simplify package management. The subscription model ensures timely updates and access to Red Hat’s stellar support, which has saved me hours of troubleshooting. Integration with enterprise tools (think OpenShift, Ansible, or cloud platforms) feels seamless, and SELinux’s granular security controls are a lifesaver. For daily use, it’s reliable enough that I rarely second-guess its performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The learning curve is steep for people new to RPM distributions. While powerful, SELinux and firewall-cmd can feel overwhelming without Red Hat’s training. The UI feels dated compared to Ubuntu or Fedora, which might deter people used to polished GUIs. Licensing costs add up quickly for small businesses, and the subscription activation process is clunky—I’ve lost time untangling portal issues. Out-of-the-box software is often older for stability’s sake, which means manually adding repos for newer apps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is extremely efficient in terms of CPU and RAM management. It has virtually zero bloatware. It also connects with Red Hat's cloud solutions as well. RHEL community forums and support is easy to contact. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
RHEL has problems while installing Python related environments such as Anaconda. Also, RHEL discussion forums don't provide much help while debugging and solving such issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Redhat AKA RHEL is a best Linux OS environment that anybody can use on there enterprise environments. Mostly because of the support and the security they provides, its freqently provides all the patches to all the indentified bugs and can be used to deploy test and modify any kind of linux based packages easily. You can deploy this OS using very low hardware resources and if you are CLI lover this is the product that you need to choose. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
RHEL is mostly reliable for the CLI users just like other linux base OS. For the GUI users, its not that simple to use as Windows its not that user friendly interface. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I have been using RHEL for many years and it never disappoints, a solid, stable and reliable OS. Up to date features, great knoweldge base and patch system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Compared to some of the other distro's this one is not opensource and will require a subscription. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to use and provides maximum security with high delivery of customer support and implementation of integraton. A large number of features can be frequently used . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Easy to use but bit priecy,
Heavy budget trainings are required. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
RHEL has strong security features, including Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) and regular security updates. meating various compliance standards,
RHEL has strong security features, including Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) and regular security updates. I
RHEL is optimized for performance across different workloads, from small-scale applications to large, distributed systems.
RHEL is well-suited for modern, cloud-native workloads and container-based applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Not dislike few bottlenecks are
SELinux can be complex to configure and troubleshoot for users who don’t need strict security enforcement.
Advanced security features like SELinux, OpenSCAP, and audit tools are available for enterprise-grade security compliance Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RHEL is very stable and for RHEL its security is priority which includes its selenium enhanced linux feature which gives several access controls.
For me i found its very easy to use and implementation is quite simple if you follow the steps correctly.It also provides comprehensive support services, including 24/7 support for critical issues which makes it very easy for enterprise companies.
i have used it during my tenure at cisco frequently for trainning purpose and also appeared for exam. Integration as i mentioned is very easy. i will highly recommend RHEL. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Few things that i would like to mention:
1. If you are new to RHEL then the command help which is given in linux is not bery helpful for a beginner to understand .
2. The subscription fees is on higher side which makes it difficult to use for an indivisual users or small companies.
3. Sometimes you might feel the support services are slow but it depends. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I liked most about my experience with RedHat is that being part of the Free Software community gives one the freedom to develop changes, and in case of any problem, there is the support of technical support that helps to resolve doubts and supports completing the work. It has also helped me understand the development of scripts in Ansible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
So far, I have had a bad experience with RedHat. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.