
The ability to have Sona screen calls, answer common questions, and transfer customers to our business phone app is what attracted us to Quo. Having recordings and transcripts available is useful for reviewing customer conversations. However, the ongoing transfer failures have prevented us from getting the main benefit we switched for: reliably connecting customers with our team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The biggest problems are unreliable Sona transfers and the time it has taken to resolve a confirmed bug affecting customer calls. When Sona transfers customers to our Quo app, it rings briefly and sends them to voicemail before we can answer. Calls are marked “You rejected the call,” even though nobody declined them. We reproduced this on iPhone, Android, and desktop, including with only one device signed in. We opened a ticket on September 19, 2026. On September 25, Quo confirmed in writing that this was a backend bug, not our settings, devices, or network. As of October 15, 26 days after opening the ticket, it remains unresolved with no fix date. We have provided screenshots, specific call examples, and extensive troubleshooting. I also copied the CEO and a VP. Support acknowledges the issue, but I have to repeatedly chase updates, and we still lack a working resolution. Meanwhile, customer calls continue going to voicemail, leaving us to return calls that should have connected directly. Some AI summaries say calls were successfully transferred even when the conversation shows a missed call and voicemail. For a business phone service, reliable call delivery and timely resolution of critical bugs are essential. This experience has made me regret porting our business number to Quo. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.


