I like that Qase makes organizing and managing test cases simple and intuitive. It's helps our team track bugs and QA coverage efficiently across complex enterprise environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The reporting in Qase is simple and easy to understand though I wish it had a few more options for digging into trends.

Setting up custom automation took a bit of time at first, but once it's done, everything runs really smoothly and keeps our testing organized. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like best about this tool is it's clean and easy to use interface. As a senior website designer, I appreciate how simple it is to review test cases and understand QA feedback without dealing with unnecessary complexity. It helps me stay aligned with developers and testers and keeps the overall web project workflow smooth and organized. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes Qase has a small learning curve at the start, but once you get used to it, it becomes a very effective and reliable tool for daily project work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like the simplicity and straightforward features of Qase, which make it easy to use for day-to-day testing without having to spend too much time figuring things out. This helps me concentrate more on the actual testing work. The Aiden AI for generating test cases is also growing on me, especially as it creates test cases that already follow my format, saving both time and effort. Qase is great for automation testing too; I'm amazed at how it automatically creates test runs, making the process smoother and more efficient, particularly for repeated tests. Overall, it makes both manual and automation testing more manageable. The initial setup of Qase was easy and the tool is very user-friendly, which really supports my workflow and grows with use over time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes Qase can feel a bit laggy, especially when navigating between pages or loading test cases. There are moments when actions take longer than expected, which can slow down the testing flow, particularly during busy testing sessions. Improving the performance and responsiveness would make the overall experience smoother and help maintain focus while working. In terms of performance, Qase can sometimes feel slow when loading test cases, switching between sections, or working with larger test suites. This becomes more noticeable when multiple testers are using the project at the same time. Improving page load times, reducing delays when clicking actions, and making the UI more responsive would really help improve the overall experience. It would also be great if background processes, like syncing or saving changes, were faster or less noticeable so they don't interrupt the workflow. Overall, better performance optimization would make Qase feel smoother and more efficient during daily testing activities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Qase for managing both manual and automated test cases for our SaaS product development. The biggest feature for us is the integration with Asana and Playwright, which makes a lot of our interactions seamless and automated. Playwright helps us run UI tests, and Qase allows us to track and manage these tests. I also found it really easy to set up Qase thanks to the setup flow and tutorials. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish Qase would write to Asana so that we can get linked back to Qase from the Asana ticket. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Clean UI and fast test case management. It's easy to organize suites, write test cases and track execution without wasting time. The integration ( like API and CI tools) are practical, so it fits well into real development workflows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Advanced workflow options are still evolving, so handling very complex use cases can take a bit of adjustment. Also, navigating between sections could be more streamlined to save time during frequent use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Qase is how clearly test cases are organized, it really helps me quickly understand and fix issues in mobile apps.

Also, it improves coordination with QA team, so less back-and-forth and faster releases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it feels a bit slow when handling large test cases or test runs, which can be frustrating during tight deadlines. Also, integration with dev tools could be better to make the workflow more seamless. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qase has all the tools any QA team even needs. Apart from that, their support team is really quick! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Their AI tools can be a bit slow at times, which affects the UX. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- It is a very user friendly test management system

- Continuous development and enhancement of the software

- Easy, clear management of different project repositories

- New feature (AIDEN) is a great tool to help with generating test cases and, more specifically, help in suggesting corner/edge cases we may not have thought off Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- There is nothing to add here with regard to negative points Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s easy to use, and the customer support is fantastic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The .NET integration took a bit of time to wire up, but with fantastic support and timely updates, we were able to get everything set up successfully. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I find most helpful about qase is the ability to create test cases using AI, along with the responsive, active chat support whenever I have questions or inquiries. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about Qase is that when I integrated Newman with Qase, it didn’t reflect the test results for the test cases that passed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.