Top Rated QAComplete Alternatives
14 out of 15 Total Reviews for QAComplete
QAComplete provides a limited range of support forums where users are unable to gather feedback and research the product before making any decisions. Its poor to have access, to user experiences and insights to diving into problems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I find it less useful that QAComplete does not allow for filtering test cases based on the number of steps written per test. This feature makes managing and organizing test cases much more difficult. One potential drawback of QAComplete is its performance, which impacts the progress of the testing process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It makes it difficult for me to find and manage test cases with step counts, which consumes me a lot of time. This feature has been not helpful, in my day to day testing tasks. Has decreased my productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
QAComplete encounters performance issues when dealing with large scale development infrastructures. There are aspects where the support provided is lacking despite Smart Bears marketing efforts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It gives best opinions on software and also we can compare the products side by side Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It should expand more and also should have shorcuts to use it in a simplied way Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What I like is the end to end solution provided by the QA complete team that is well versed in what they do Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The amount of time spent in understanding the application alone , I can be paralled with some manual testing in the meantime Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Helps to deliver the high quality product
Easy to Review & Compare the test result
Easy to manage testing cycle Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Sometimes Response is slow
Filtering test cases result is not correct sometimes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Flexibility
Accuracy
Guidance
Automation testing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I don't think so I have any disappointment with QA complete but if they provide on time call support then it would be better Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The feature allows me to filter test cases based on the number of steps written for each test. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There are instances where certain aspects of support fall short. Its important to research the product and read feedback from other users on support forums before making a decision. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
QAComplete is very intuitive... it’s easy to get it up and running to create and edit test cases and to notify teams about identified defects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The cost is very high and the attention is not personalized Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Reasonably intuitive, decent API. Performance and reliability are improved over a couple of years ago. Tech support is pretty decent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Reporting menu is completely useless--nobody in my office uses the reporting feature for anything. You can do full text searches, but you can't create a search filter without saving it. Most people in my office don't use the test runner. Performance for SAAS is no better than adequate. Web GUI can be frustrating to use, with those stupid narrow scroll bars that you can't see and which require extremely precise mouse movements. Starting recently, the website session timeout is too @#%!! short. Project/user setup is overly complicated, must be done by someone who's reasonably computer savvy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
what we did like was that the ALM solution was 'all in one'. Defects, stories\requirements, customer portal, project management in one place, with the capability to link Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Performance was horrible, and there were numerous issues\defects that we had to contend with. We worked with the SmartBear team for a considerable period to address our issues but were unsuccessful. In fact, the "pain" was so great that we simply abandoned the app and all of our requirements, test cases (thousands), defect details, taking CSV exports and moving over to Axosoft. While not perfect, Axosoft gives much improved perfomance and is a simpler interface to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
