Top 10 Procore Alternatives & Competitors

(4,687)4.6 out of 5

Thousands of users compare Procore with other Construction Project Management Software tools to find the best fit for their team or business. Construction Project Management Software is used by teams seeking time saving, quick platforms with features like third-party inspection software integration, notifications and reminders, and mobile support, according to G2 reviews. When comparing Procore with other tools, reviewers most often evaluate communication and project management as key differentiators.
The best overall alternative to Procore is Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud), rated ~4.4 stars on G2 from 5481+ reviewers. It is frequently praised for collaboration and team collaboration. Other well-known alternatives to Procore are:

• RedTeam – known for reliability and ease of use (G2 star rating ~4.1)
• Fieldwire by Hilti – highly rated for project management and team collaboration (G2 star rating ~4.5)
• HeavyJob – offers customer support and helpful (G2 star rating ~4.6)
• Bluebeam – best suited for teams that need tools and intuitive (G2 star rating ~4.6)

Browse top options below. Based on G2 review data, Procore is most commonly used in industries like Construction Project Management Software, Jobsite Management Software, Construction Drawing Management Software. Compare user ratings by vertical to find the best fit.

G2 offers free advice on alternatives to Procore.

Chat with an expert

How would you like to receive Software Advice?

FormAnswer questions at your own pace, no call required.

AI AgentChat live and get a recommendation in minutes.

Phone CallTalk it through live with a software advisor.

Top 10 Alternatives to Procore Recently Reviewed By G2 Community

Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)
By Autodesk
4.4/5(5,669)
Product Description
Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) connects workflows, teams and data at every stage of construction to reduce risk, maximize efficiency, and increase profits. Built on a unified platform and common data environment, Autodesk Construction Cloud empowers general contractors, specialty trades, designers and owners to drive better business outcomes. Construction teams will have a comprehensive construction management platform with all data in one central location to simplify collaboration, proactively anticipate project changes and provide data-driven guidance for organizational improvement.
Categories in common with Procore:
Punch List
Bid Management
Construction Accounting
Takeoff
Jobsite Management
What G2 Reviewers Say About Procore vs Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud)
G2 reviewers describe Procore as useful for construction teams that need field access to drawings, RFIs, submittals, observations, and daily logs through a mobile app. Reviewers value its centralized workflows and traceability, while noting that its broad toolset can feel overwhelming, require training, and involve extra navigation.
G2 reviewers highlight Autodesk Forma (formerly Autodesk Construction Cloud) for connecting design coordination, cloud models, issues, sheets, and project documentation in a common environment. Reviewers value BIM collaboration and access across firms, while noting that permissions, module transitions, setup, and workflow adoption can be complicated, with occasional loading or reliability concerns.
• Procore reviewers emphasize mobile field workflows for drawings, RFIs, submittals, observations, and daily logs, while Autodesk Forma reviewers emphasize BIM coordination, model review, clash detection, and connected design-to-construction workflows.
• Procore reviewers describe broad construction and financial tools that require training and navigation, while Autodesk Forma reviewers cite permission complexity, module transitions, and project setup as adoption challenges.

1. AI can help you find the answers. G2 helps you trust them.

   Connect G2 to Claude or ChatGPT for answers grounded in G2's trusted reviews, comparisons, and pricing from real user insights.

   How it works

   Connect G2 to ChatGPTConnect G2 to Claude

RedTeam
By RedTeam Software
4.1/5(105)
Product Description
RedTeam is construction management software built by GCs, for GCs. Commercial general contractors use RedTeam to run bids, budgets, daily logs, and documents from one place, from preconstruction through closeout.
Categories in common with Procore:
Punch List
Construction ERP
Bid Management
Construction Accounting
Jobsite Management
What G2 Reviewers Say About Procore vs RedTeam
G2 reviewers describe Procore as a broad, centralized platform for mid-market construction teams, with strong document, drawing, RFI, and submittal tracking plus useful field access. They also note that its extensive tools, permissions, and workflows can feel overwhelming and require training, making Procore the more feature-rich but more involved option beside RedTeam.
G2 reviewers characterize RedTeam as a practical fit for small-business construction teams, with a simple interface and a connected flow from estimating and bidding through proposals, contracts, project management, and closeout. Reviewers value entering information once and responsive support, while noting bugs, slower performance, limited mobile functionality, and occasional extra clicks or learning friction.
• Workflow continuity: RedTeam reviewers highlight carrying information from bidding through contracts and project stages without re-entering it, while Procore reviewers emphasize centralized tracking for RFIs, submittals, drawings, and correspondence.
• Field access: Procore reviewers value its mobile tools for drawings, photos, observations, and daily logs, while RedTeam reviewers describe the tablet and phone app as more limited than the desktop experience.
• AI availability: Procore reviewers mention AI features for finding information and monitoring updates, while a RedTeam reviewer notes that RedTeam does not currently offer AI functionality.

Fieldwire by Hilti
By Fieldwire
4.5/5(586)
Product Description
It's the easiest way for construction foremen, supers, and engineers to share blueprints, files and RFIs without leaving the jobsite.
Reviewers say compared to Procore, Fieldwire by Hilti is:
Easier to set up
Easier to admin
More usable
Categories in common with Procore:
Punch List
Jobsite Management
Construction Project Management
Construction Drawing Management
Construction Risk & Safety
What G2 Reviewers Say About Procore vs Fieldwire by Hilti
G2 reviewers describe Procore as a broad, centralized platform for construction teams, with strong coverage across drawings, RFIs, submittals, logs, financials, and integrations. In comparison with Fieldwire by Hilti, reviewers value Procore’s depth and traceability, while noting that its many tools, workflows, and permission levels can feel overwhelming and require more time to learn and maintain.
G2 reviewers portray Fieldwire by Hilti as a simpler, field-focused option for distributing current plans, pinning tasks and photos to drawings, and keeping crews and offices aligned from mobile devices. They praise its intuitive setup and quick adoption, while noting gaps in advanced cost control, customization, integrations, and external document sharing compared with broader platforms.
• Procore reviewers highlight broader coverage across RFIs, submittals, financial tools, and document traceability, while Fieldwire by Hilti reviewers emphasize plan-based tasks, photos, punch lists, and field communication.
• Fieldwire by Hilti reviewers cite missing advanced cost control and budget tracking, whereas Procore reviewers value forecasting, budgeting, and financial reporting tools.
• Fieldwire by Hilti offers a free plan, while Procore does not.

HeavyJob
By HCSS
4.6/5(264)
Product Description
HCSS is a time entry system designed for foremen that allows you to see daily job costs against the estimate, manage foremen and have them plan ahead, with the ability to work offline or online from any device.
Reviewers say compared to Procore, HeavyJob is:
Better at support
More expensive
Easier to do business with
Categories in common with Procore:
Bid Management
Jobsite Management
Construction Estimating
Construction Project Management
Project Cost Management
What G2 Reviewers Say About Procore vs HeavyJob
G2 reviewers describe Procore as a broad, centralized platform for drawings, RFIs, submittals, daily logs, photos, financials, and project communication. In this comparison, its strength is connecting office and field information in one place, including mobile access. Reviewers also note that Procore’s depth can feel overwhelming, with multi-step navigation and a learning curve for newer or smaller teams.
G2 reviewers characterize HCSS as a user-friendly, field-oriented suite that connects estimating, production tracking, safety, time collection, reporting, and office operations. They value its movement of information from field teams into office and accounting workflows, along with responsive customer support. Reviewers also identify uneven experiences across desktop, web, and mobile modules, plus learning effort for advanced flexibility and setup.
• Procore reviewers emphasize centralized project records for drawings, RFIs, submittals, and correspondence, while HCSS reviewers emphasize carrying estimating and production data into field operations, billing, and accounting.
• Procore reviewers value mobile access to project documents and updates, while HCSS reviewers specifically praise mobile time and quantity entry and note that near-miss entry requires an iPad.
• Procore reviewers describe the breadth of tools and navigation as a learning challenge, while HCSS reviewers describe differences among desktop, web, and mobile experiences and uneven polish across modules.

Bluebeam
By Bluebeam
4.6/5(500)
Product Description
Bluebeam is the leading provider of digital productivity and collaboration solutions for industries that design and build our world. Trusted by over 3 million users in more than 160 countries, Bluebeam’s solutions empower professionals to make their mark, adapt to change, and deliver projects successfully. Revu is Bluebeam’s flagship product - a powerful, versatile, and easy-to-use desktop application helping professionals communicate clearly, collaborate effectively, and optimize PDF workflows. It increases teams’ productivity with discipline-specific and customizable markup tools, precise measurements set to drawing scale, real-time collaboration on a single source of truth, and process efficiency tools that streamline your workflows. Bluebeam Cloud helps keep projects moving no matter where contributors are. By extending Studio in Revu to your web browser or mobile device, Bluebeam Cloud lets you markup documents and collaborate on Studio Sessions and Projects from anywhere.
Reviewers say compared to Procore, Bluebeam is:
Better at meeting requirements
Easier to set up
Categories in common with Procore:
Punch List
Takeoff
Construction Project Management
Construction Drawing Management
What G2 Reviewers Say About Procore vs Bluebeam
G2 reviewers describe Procore as a construction project management platform that centralizes drawings, RFIs, submittals, daily logs, financials, and field communication, with a useful mobile app. In this comparison, reviewers specifically note that Procore’s markup and scaling tools are rudimentary, sometimes pushing teams toward Bluebeam, while its breadth can create a steeper learning curve.
G2 reviewers position Bluebeam as a focused tool for construction and design-document work, emphasizing accurate markups, measurements, takeoffs, PDF editing, and real-time collaboration through Studio. They value its customizable toolsets and approachable workflow, while noting that advanced features take time to learn, large files can lag, and the mobile experience needs improvement.
• Procore reviewers emphasize end-to-end project information management, including RFIs, submittals, daily logs, and financial workflows; Bluebeam reviewers emphasize PDF-based drawing review, markup, measurement, and takeoff.
• Procore reviewers specifically call its markup and scaling tools rudimentary and cite Bluebeam as an external tool, while Bluebeam reviewers describe markup and takeoff capabilities as core strengths.

CMiC Platform
By CMiC
4.4/5(211)
Product Description
CMiC Platform is an integrated system that is developed around features and benefits that help you manage your finances, projects, documents, and analytics and reports.
Reviewers say compared to Procore, CMiC Platform is:
Slower to reach roi
More expensive
More usable
Categories in common with Procore:
Construction ERP
Construction Accounting
Construction Data Analytics
Construction Project Management
Construction Drawing Management
What G2 Reviewers Say About Procore vs CMiC Platform
G2 reviewers describe Procore as a strong fit for field-centered construction coordination, highlighting mobile access to drawings, RFIs, submittals, photos, and daily logs. They value keeping project information together and improving communication between field and office teams. Reviewers also note that Procore’s broad feature set can feel overwhelming, with navigation and onboarding requiring time, particularly for smaller or newer users.
G2 reviewers position CMiC Platform as an integrated construction ERP for mid-market teams, emphasizing its connection of accounting, project management, job costing, and workforce data. They value real-time financial visibility, construction-specific workflows, configurable processes, and responsive support. Reviewers also describe a steep learning curve, detailed setup, and occasional performance or reporting friction as trade-offs.
• Procore reviewers specifically praise on-site mobile handling of drawings, photos, observations, and daily logs, whereas CMiC Platform reviewers focus more on accounting-linked job costing, billing, and financial reporting.
• CMiC Platform reviewers describe highly configurable workflows and occasional reliance on support or consultants for reports and customizations, while Procore reviewers more often describe navigation, onboarding, and feature complexity as the main adoption challenges.

Newforma
By Newforma
4.2/5(191)
Product Description
Newforma PIM solution an integrated solution for managing forms of project information, at the office, from the cloud, and on the go letting you manage profitability and risk, capture and connect processes, and review documents without printing.
Reviewers say compared to Procore, Newforma is:
Easier to do business with
Categories in common with Procore:
Punch List
Construction Accounting
Jobsite Management
Construction Project Management
Construction Drawing Management
What G2 Reviewers Say About Procore vs Newforma
G2 reviewers describe Procore as a broad construction-management platform that brings drawings, RFIs, submittals, daily logs, photos, and financial workflows together. In contrast with Newforma, reviewers emphasize Procore’s field-oriented mobile access and project tracking, while noting that its extensive tools can feel overwhelming and require time to learn.
G2 reviewers highlight Newforma for searchable project records, email filing, document control, and RFI and submittal management, especially across architecture, engineering, and construction workflows. Reviewers also note that Newforma’s interface can feel dated or clunky, with slow loading and multiple steps. Compared with Procore, its strongest distinction is retrieving correspondence and project history.
• Procore reviewers highlight mobile access to drawings, photos, observations, and daily logs at job sites, while Newforma reviewers focus on email filing, search, and project correspondence retrieval.
• Newforma reviewers cite slow loading, dated interface elements, and multiple steps for some tasks. Procore reviewers more often describe broad tool depth and navigation as the main learning challenge.

JobTread
By JobTread
4.9/5(118)
Product Description
JobTread provides end-to-end construction management software that helps jobs-based businesses manage all of their processes, from pre-construction to project completion. The platform creates a central location to manage jobs, teams, documents, photos, finances, customers, vendors, sub-contractors, and more. Its budget-first approach creates financial transparency at every stage of a project. Get organized, complete your projects on time, and increase your profits with JobTread.
Reviewers say compared to Procore, JobTread is:
Easier to do business with
Easier to admin
Better at support
Categories in common with Procore:
Bid Management
Construction Accounting
Jobsite Management
Construction Estimating
Construction Data Analytics
What G2 Reviewers Say About Procore vs JobTread
G2 reviewers describe Procore as a broad, centralized system for drawings, RFIs, submittals, daily logs, photos, and financial workflows, with useful mobile access for field teams. For the mid-market construction organizations represented, reviewers value traceability and coordination, but frequently note that Procore’s depth, navigation, and multi-step workflows create a substantial learning curve.
G2 reviewers describe JobTread as an intuitive, highly customizable platform for contractors, bringing estimating, budgets, scheduling, customer communication, job costing, invoicing, and production into one place. Small-business users especially praise hands-on onboarding, responsive support, and workflow flexibility, while noting that extensive customization requires setup time and continued learning as processes evolve.
• Procore reviewers emphasize field access to drawings, RFIs, submittals, photos, and daily logs, while JobTread reviewers emphasize connected estimating, budgets, scheduling, invoicing, and customer communication.
• Procore reviewers often describe navigation and multi-step workflows as demanding to learn, whereas JobTread reviewers connect its setup effort to customization and report hands-on onboarding and responsive support as practical advantages.
• Procore’s mobile access is valuable for field work but is sometimes described as less intuitive, while JobTread reviewers more often highlight straightforward navigation and adaptable workflows.

Touchplan
By Touchplan
4.3/5(199)
Product Description
Touchplan is the award-winning construction collaboration tool that project teams actually like. Serving field teams, planners and stakeholders through an accessible-anywhere, web-based system, Touchplan is proven to grow businesses through substantial project-level efficiency gains. Drawing on over 20 years of experience gained through affiliated services firm MOCA Systems, Touchplan is trusted by over 30 billion dollars of construction, 15,000+ users, 1,200+ global projects and 100+ general contractors, it’s no wonder why thirty percent of the ENR top 100 list use have used Touchplan to finish ahead.
Reviewers say compared to Procore, Touchplan is:
Slower to reach roi
Easier to set up
Easier to admin
Categories in common with Procore:
Punch List
Jobsite Management
Construction Data Analytics
Construction Project Management
Contractor Management

Acumatica
By Acumatica
4.4/5(2,055)
Product Description
Acumatica is a leading provider of Cloud ERP and Cloud Accounting software for mid-size businesses and non-for-profits
Reviewers say compared to Procore, Acumatica is:
Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with Procore:
Construction ERP
Construction Accounting
What G2 Reviewers Say About Procore vs Acumatica
G2 reviewers describe Procore as a construction-focused platform that keeps drawings, RFIs, submittals, observations, daily logs, and project correspondence together, with mobile access valued on job sites. Reviewers also note that its depth supports field-to-office coordination, but the many tools, steps, and permission settings can make navigation and onboarding feel overwhelming, especially for smaller contractors.
G2 reviewers describe Acumatica as a flexible, customizable ERP that connects financials, purchasing, inventory, sales, production, and operational data in one system. They value configurable dashboards, reporting, integrations, and role-specific workflows across business functions. Reviewers also report a steep learning curve, complex implementation, and occasional unclear errors, with interface and process improvements still requested.
• Procore reviewers emphasize construction field execution, including mobile access to drawings, RFIs, submittals, observations, and daily logs, while Acumatica reviewers emphasize cross-functional ERP workflows spanning financials, purchasing, inventory, sales, and production.
• Procore’s cited challenge is navigating its many construction tools and workflows. Acumatica’s cited challenge is configuring a flexible system, managing implementation, and troubleshooting unclear errors.