Top Rated Planview IdeaPlace Alternatives
61 Planview IdeaPlace Reviews
Overall Review Sentiment for Planview IdeaPlace
Log in to view review sentiment.
Its easy to use and understand. Promotes collaboration and easy ideation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The features such as leader board and recognition avenues are missing. The integration with other applications is not present Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The functionalities it acquires, related to the management of ideas shared by our public, is ideal for the administration and creation of new innovative ideas for development, being of great proportion, since these processes are constant, and allow a variety in alternatives for a fair modernization, mentioning that one of the most striking points from my point of view is that it encourages an opportunity for employees to offer their ideas on a specific topic, to determine their approval processes and start said production, which gives way to consider the different argumentative criteria, which activate the progress of an idea, being extremely useful, thanks to its ease of use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It should implement a detailed function of ideas, more than all an evaluation, that does not maintain versatile purposes, but rather specific in its entirety, separating each category, in different areas, in order to achieve a more detailed approval, due to the processes of reading and identification, are more accurate and easier to execute at large scales, including that you must maintain better personalized reports, because they do not track the type of metrics we want to locate. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I love Planview Spigit as it allows to have a progression of ideas, there are many criteria on what can activate the constant growth of a particular plan, becoming a great and successful project, underlining that it is very easy to configure, in others Outstanding aspects should be determined that this software creates an extraordinary team that accesses a company to initiate the proper use of its system, since it assigns personnel to organizations, which facilitates communication with the same integrated person, creating an environment based on the trust necessary to share the inner desires of using the system itself. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
In constructive theories for this software, we can mention that the platform is not very intuitive, since when creating the store and adjusting the specific points for the initiation of the system when it is implemented, so that it adapts to the field, in the field of some company, it is quite difficult, the terminology of this service elaborated a break in the ability to delegate the implementation, that is, to manipulate the appearance of the challenge in an easier way, without excluding that it can improve the funnel of idea integrations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Its relational content connectivity fosters a massive level of information inclusion in which its possibility of increasing management effectiveness goes hand in hand with its characteristics and multiple data interpretation tools, through the interpretive facility based on the analysis of sustainable training, techniques developed to increase predictive capacity skills focused on ensuring optimal work where progress is built. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
In its content error recognition program, you can see considerable details in its preparation and the justification for data entry and exit, where this error is present by allowing the channel to enter the company system, erroneous information, It can damage the computer structure of plans intended to make progressive improvements to the company's digital program. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I would have to say nothing. It has never worked for me and we continually get error messages. I’ve never been able to submit an idea to my company - I have tried 6 times, put in a lot of time to only get an error message and a picture of a cat.
Got an update from the vendor that their app doesn't work in specific parts of the world. What SaaS application doesn't work in specific areas (it's not like I'm in China or North Korea). Impossible for our organization to fully use this because a chunk of our employees can't submit ideas. And incredibly weird in that we access the site, but can't submit anything. No workaround and no timeline for fixing this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Same as the above. It’s also a pretty clunky tool and not a great user interface. It feels like old software - like something built 10 years ago and it’s just been hanging around. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I like:
- The whitelabeled portal
- The ability to get feedback on ideas from across the organization Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I dislike:
- The UI. It is outdated and difficult to use
- Unnecessarily complex workflows
- We've experienced so many bugs like things not saving or updating when you press the button. Your comments don't autosave either, so when the page stops working (which it does often) your work is lost
- Data export is possible but not simple Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Flexible to configure and to use according the own needs. Great volume of features. Easy configuration when passing the initial admin training. Great support by SPIGIT pro's, leading you for the first steps (if you like) and shipping you around the cliffs, for getting a total success already at the first idea competition. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Only a minor note: As it is the same platform for all using companies, it is not easy, to put a desirable new feature into developing queue. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
- Layout is user-friendly;
- Messaging, rewards management and idea discussion can be done in the same place;
- Fairly easy to launch, edit timed challenges;
- Allows administrators to add customised content, e.g., success stories, any other comms Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
- No mobile app for the software, and mobile version of the website does not have access to features that are not part of the ongoing challenges;
- Reporting does not include export of details in the idea templates
- Names of common widgets (to select for display) are not entirely straightforward Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Flexibility of the tool to adapt to multiple client situations. Ability to customize a challenge to a specific audience or crowd. We have run over 1000 challenges that are very diverse. It is has been able to adapt to all of the situations we have attempted. Some time takes a bit of work with the tool to get it right, but so far it has been outstanding.
Another component I like a lot is the inisghts tool and ability to embedded dashboards. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Some of the recent UI improvements are not really improvements. Specifically, I liked the Ball effect for the Idea Stages. The new approach is not very useful. On the plus side of the new UI, I do like the Admin console, especially the graduation criteria panel. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Isabelle L. Isabelle L."
Our current program used to rely on spreadsheets and access database. Moving to Spigit allowed us to become more efficient and automate our process.
It gives a very nice visibility to all submissions, and encourages users to collaborate, like a social media platform Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
We would like to see easier ways of exporting ideas. Currently, Spigit leverages a 3rd party vendor . We would like that our users search in their tool and export their results.
We would like to have clearer visual for category moderators: our program gets a lot of ideas so when you have very large numbers, it'S easy to lose track on what's on your plate. You then need to use the reports provided by the 3rd party, build your own dashboards, etc Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.