The people and professionals

You can always get support Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Installing is very complicated requires much time Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Remediation and the ability to resolve vulnerability Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The minimum requirements and installation process Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of use and straightforward architecture, plus visibility Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not always having clear paths to remediation for multiple vulnerabilities Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A powerful tool for performing vulnerability scanning and remediation suggestions and working well with their support team Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I didn't find a scenario I wanted to run that doesn't exist, and I'm also waiting for new things to come out, so right now I'm happy with what I have right now. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ability of the tools to lessen the time of penetration testing versus the manual way. The validation is unique features that most VA doesn't have. With this tools, you can manage at ease and implement and deploy the software in just a few hours Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The reporting is not that very informative. It should improved more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best about Pentera is the user friendly UI, easy to use and fully automated Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dsilike about Pentera is the high resources utilization Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The time it saves versus the manual way. We were able run more scan and spend less. The features are great and the support is very likely responsive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Maybe a little more improvement in handling false positive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pentera is fully automated, very quick to implement. The support is also above average. The integration is smooth. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The disadvantage of Pentera is the limited OS or platform compatibility and requires high amount of system resources Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ability to similate real world attacks, test the response of my deployed controls to see if they are setup appropriately and as effective as i want them to be. The most striking benefit is the ability to go from point in time, sample based testing to continuous validation and testing ensures better overall security outcomes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CART / ASM / BAS tools like Pentera are not a replacement for conventional Penetration Testing, Vulnerability Analysis, etc. but are a good baseline.

Specifically the reporting (dashboard) in Pentera can be improved especially when reporting on an enterprise scale rather than specific applications or environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- Allow to save time , doing more scans and focusing on what's important

- Allow us to delegate cybersecurity tasks to people with less skills or experience

- the great team behind (support/product)

- how the product is evolving : new features keeping simplicity and stability

- the transparency about roadmaps

- the ROI we have overall Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Actually we are satisfied and do not have something we would dislike - escept maybe some improvment we may wait ( as managing false positive/follow the remediation/actions in the console itself) but that's something the team is aware off and it should come in the roadmap in a near future Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.