tracking deadlines
the analytics are a really cool feature that is new to me Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
1) I would love to be able to run a combined trademark and docket report. So, a report of all of a client's trademarks alongside all their due dates.
2) It seems that the Canadian applications that are published do not get labeled as published in the analytics report. They stay at pending.
3) I don't think my performance analysis feature works correctly.
4) I wish the excel spreadsheet that it prints had better formatting Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
46 out of 47 Total Reviews for PATTSY WAVE
Overall Review Sentiment for PATTSY WAVE
Log in to view review sentiment.
Searching features; managing statutory deadlines; autodocketing of important actions (i.e. U.S. office actions); USPTO data validation; client reporting Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data validation for foreign trademarks and patents are not that efficient - applications numbers for example have to be in specific formatting; you cannot create/edit special fields for pedigree data in the main fields (i.e. unique firm/client reference numbers); when you do a 'mass' search for client portfolio (for example), you should be able to jump from record to record instead of hitting the 'next arrow' continuously; all PW platforms should have the new AQS annutities management tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I really like the automatic payments for maintenance fees. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It would be more helpful if the actions auto docketed from the USPTO rather than having to do it ourselves. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Any upgrades to the system or updates to the law files happen automatically. It is very easy in that regard. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It auto-dockets useless deadlines every time a new application is entered. (Status Checks, Publication deadlines in EP Validation states, and many more.) Even following the instructions to suppress unwanted actions didn't stop them. Limited law files - many deadlines need to be calculated yourself and manually entered. Reporting capabilities are VERY LIMITED. Storing documents in the file records is not particularly easy, and bulk downloading a file is not possible. This makes Due Diligence or Production of Documents extremely time consuming! It cannot be used on a laptop screen because there are no vertical scroll bars! Anything below the main details of the case screen is not visible and you have no way to scroll to it. (This includes things like the list of inventors, assignees, family members, and custom fields.) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
System provides complete access snapshot of filings; new user interface is much easier to read Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Awkward user interface and family linkage. Unclear coverage of non-US docketing events Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is easy to navigate a patent or trademark family, which enables us to easily view related cases and track docket items in corresponding cases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is perhaps overly simplistic, at the expense of functionality offered by competitive products. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Our IP/ DOcketing team mainly used this softwre. As the admin i only suported ugrades, and updates Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The interface view seemed older than new software. Thi could have been the version we were on, but i'm unsure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
