
My favorite thing about Mimecast Advanced Email Security is the relationship with our CSR, Brett Lenzi, who always jumps into support tickets, escalates them, and is a constant good-will advocate for us. I like how rules are easily configurable and the platform is always coming out with improvements. I appreciate the creation of custom rules to block new phishing patterns or suspicious domains and the ability to fine-tune filtering based on our specific environment, like by department. The intuitive rule building interface allows me to quickly make adjustments, and I find it valuable that we're continually working to reduce false positives via allow-lists and block-lists. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
We really need an API solution - we are missing out on connecting some services due to lack of API integration - MX records are really a legacy method. Limited automation capabilities - we can't programmatically pull email security metrics into our centralized security dashboards or SIEM platforms. Manual reporting processes - security incident data has to be manually exported rather than automatically fed into IR workflows. Disconnected threat intel - can't easily correlate Mimecast threat data with other security tools to get a full picture of attack campaigns. User provisioning inefficiencies - onboarding new employees or managing departing staff, we have to manually update policies rather than integrating with our identity management system via M365. The mx record approach limited my ability to create the interconnected security ecosystem that modern organizations need. API connectivity would broaden the efficacy of the overall impact of email security within the security stack. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Validated through LinkedIn
This reviewer was offered a nominal gift card as thank you for completing this review.
Invitation from G2. This reviewer was offered a nominal gift card as thank you for completing this review.






