Marvin Pricing Overview
Marvin at a glance
Marvin makes it super simple to conduct, organize, share and analyze your user research. We automate the tedious aspects of qualitative data analysis so you’re free to uncover rich insights and design products your customers love.
More information about platform features available at https://heymarvin.com/pricing
| Name | Price | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Good for small teams that want to speed up their user research. Limited platform functionalities.
| |
| Essentials | (Minimum 5 users)
Good for startups that want to build a culture of design and research. Limited platform functionalities.
| |
| Standard | (Minimum 5 users)
Good for companies with multiple teams that want to work better together. Most platform functionalities available; no custom security, PII or compliance.
| |
| Enterprise | Contact Us | Good for large organizations that want to scale user research and need extra support, security and compliance. No platform limitations!
|
Marvin pricing & plans
Top Rated Marvin Alternatives
Marvin Pricing Reviews
The tool is quite simple to use, and the AI helps a lot to find the right data among all data collected Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The subscription can be quite expesive for freelances outside the US, due to currency exchange rates. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Marvin helps automate many of the tedious parts of qualitative research that prevent teams from using their brainpower on meaningful analysis. I particularly like the ability to invite the transcription bot to meetings (including scheduling it ahead of time), built-in discussion guides, and the auto-notes feature. There is minimum clean-up required on the transcript and jumping into tagging and analysis is easy. Getting Marvin set up was easy and I appreciated the customized onboarding that their customer success team provided. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Marvin is a bit more expensive than other repository platforms, but it also is feature-rich. Also, the auto-notes can sometimes come out a little wonky and require some QA to either delete irrelevant ones or revise incomplete notes. I do wish they had the option of numbering discussion guides in some way for easier reference, so I hope this is a future feature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
