Manus AI agent Reviews & Product Details

I use Manus AI agent to draft my research because I think it's more powerful than other options like Gemini and ChatGpt. It can scrap websites very well, perfectly understands the images in the research, and helps in drafting research papers. I like that it doesn't interact with or interrupt me between subtasks, and it doesn't require real-time responses, which allows me to work on other things while it does tasks for me. It saves time by opening and gathering a lot of sources quickly and provides a comprehensive summary and complete ideas. It works perfectly without interruptions, unless it's a wide research, and drafts well-structured overall meanings of research questions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Manus AI agent is super expensive. I feel like the pricing model needs some adjustment because it's really costly. They give you only 1,000 credits at a time, which is not enough, especially for heavy tasks. It would require a lot of money to use it fully. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Manus AI agent for a lot of tasks, mostly coding, but I also use it to analyze data, social media posts, and images. It helps me scale the things I am already good at. I love the connections it offers, especially being able to connect with GitHub, allowing it to push or commit code for me. I have a workflow set up where my GitHub is connected to Vercel and Manus is connected to GitHub, so I can work on code with Manus and then it pushes it live on my website once I'm happy with it. Manus is our go-to for actionable items as it seems to be better oriented at execution. The initial setup was easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

More connections currently there is a limited array that I use but the agent is so useful if it were connected to more platforms I could do more with it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Manus AI agent can fix some issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Their support team is completely unprofessional. After sending over 20 emails, they still don't understand my issue. I upgraded my subscription according to the offer I received, but they found out they were losing out, so they removed the credit and are not willing to return my money. This is misleading and fraud. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am a Pro customer of Manus AI and I started with high expectations, motivated by the possibilities they promised: generation of intelligent agents, development of personalized visual products, cultural integration... it all sounds wonderful on paper. But the real experience has been a series of frustrations and disappointments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Systematic and Persistent Errors

For weeks I worked alongside their AI on the development of a community app. What I received were mockups with serious linguistic errors, unintelligible texts, nonsensical language mixes, and culturally exclusive greetings. They promised "impeccable" reviews and "professionalism," but repeated the errors over and over again.

❌ Total Lack of Human Support

Despite having sent more than 10 messages through the platform, several emails to Henry and Red (the supposed founders), and direct comments in the designated spaces, no one ever responded. Only the AI responded, unable to provide real solutions. The experience became emotionally and mentally exhausting.

❌ Waste of Credits

All this poorly executed work consumed my Pro credits, with no possibility of refund, compensation, or recovery. In the end, I had to correct each sentence myself and manually review word by word everything that was supposed to come "ready to use."

✅ The Only Redeemable Part:

The visual part, although conceptual, has potential. But that does not justify the absence of a real human team, much less the charge for poorly done tasks.

Conclusion:

I do not recommend Manus AI to anyone who needs a professional final product or human attention. Unless you have the time and experience to correct everything yourself, you will find yourself alone in front of an AI that promises more than it can deliver. Manus urgently needs an ethical audit. We are not testers: we are paying customers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I had the exclusive opportunity to test Manus AI, a promising AI Agent currently available only through an invitation-based beta program. My experience allowed me to explore its technical capabilities and identify key areas where it excels and aspects where improvements are still needed.

While testing Manus AI, I was impressed by several features. One standout aspect was its ability to independently manage complex tasks. For instance, when tasked with planning a project, it didn't just assist with part of the process; it handled everything from start to finish without needing my guidance at each step. This was a significant departure from other AI tools I had used, which often required substantial input.

This is what an "AI Agent" must be!

Some key points that I have identified:

- Unlike traditional AI models that primarily generate ideas, Manus is designed to execute tasks 100% autonomously, bridging the gap between conception and execution.

- Manus operates asynchronously in the cloud, allowing users to close their devices while the AI completes tasks and notifies them upon completion.

- It can handle various types of tasks, such as screening resumes, conducting research, and performing data analysis.

- The AI has its memory capabilities, allowing it to learn from past interactions and improve its performance on similar tasks in the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One important aspect to keep in mind is that Manus AI is currently in an invite-only beta phase. Because of this, many functionalities are still under active development and refinement. During my testing, the experience varied significantly; at times, the outcomes were exceptional, demonstrating impressive capabilities. However, in other instances, the system crashed unexpectedly, interrupting workflows. Similarly, execution times showed considerable inconsistency: some tasks were completed within a few minutes, while others took hours. This instability clearly indicates that the tool still requires additional optimization and stabilization before becoming widely accessible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's ability to act autonomously and make decisions without H-I-T-L. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The credit system literally makes about as much sense as trying to explain calculus to a particularly enthusiastic houseplant. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.