Kong API Gateway Pricing Overview
| Name | Price | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Kong Konnect | Pay As You GoPer Month |
|
Kong API Gateway pricing & plans
Top Rated Kong API Gateway Alternatives
Kong API Gateway Pricing Reviews
One of the key advantages of Kong API Gateway is its flexibility and versatility. It offers a wide range of features and customization options, allowing users to tailor the solution to their specific needs and requirements. It also supports various deployment options, from on-premise installations to cloud-based environments, and can integrate with a broad range of third-party tools and platforms. Additionally, Kong's focus on security and reliability helps ensure that APIs are protected and perform well, which is critical for many organizations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
One potential downside of Kong API Gateway is that its extensive feature set and flexibility can make it complex to set up and configure, particularly for less experienced users. Some users have reported that the documentation could be more detailed or user-friendly in certain areas. Additionally, some of the more advanced features may require additional plugins or modules, which could result in added complexity or performance overhead. Finally, while Kong does offer a free, open-source version of its platform, some of the more advanced features are only available in the paid Enterprise version, which may be a consideration for some users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Built on OpenResty, with straightforward Kubernetes resource definition of routes. The documentation was good as well, and there are free plugins and an open source variant of Kong to get you locked in before you realize the need to switch to another provider. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
They are dropping their support for Alpine-based images, and their Ubuntu base image brings about too large an attack surface. So you have to build Kong yourself, but the Enterprise Gateway product adds closed source modifications so it's impossible to get a secure build. Also, you have to go with enterprise for FIPS, which is reasonable if it wasn't prohibitively priced. They charge for every separate microservice TIMES every environment, including QA or trial environments. Basically, this makes them implicitly discourage companies from decoupling their enterprise application into separate services. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
