KernelCare Enterprise Reviews & Product Details

The best thing I like about KernelCare is its light weight agent which run as the utility to fix the vulnerabilities at runtime in memory without the need of rebooting the linux severs. Also KernelCare ePortal has the pach sets caching capability which help in saving bandwidth to download pacthset again and again over the inernet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Umm, ePortal need to be deployed in customer's network and no cloud deployment is supported. If this can be done, it can save lots of management and maintenance efforts on user's part. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Applying any Kernel patch typically need to reboot the Linux system, however, with KernelCare we can apply the fixes to vulnerabilities in memory by applying the patchsets without rebooting the linux serves. Also KernelCare have small agent which does all this magic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ePortal support REST based interface to interact with it. While there are required APIs, APIs for some other import workflow need to be added. Also ePortal deployment on cloud should be thought of. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like KernelCare ability to apply patcsets to fix vulnerabilities on linux servers without asking to reboot these servers. Also, KernelCare agent which runs on the target is light weight utility tool witch good set of command support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ePortal is suggested to deployed on prem in csutomer network. It is not cloud based as of now. If this support will be added it would be a good support. Also ePotal REST APIs need to improved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like KernelCare's ability to apply patch sets to fix the vulnerabilities on Linux machine in memory without the need to reboot the servers. Also this support is available for multiple flavors of the Linux. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

No support is now available to host ePortal on cloud as the SaaS application. Also ePortal's API for automation to use need to be improved for some functionality like configuring the patch server. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like about KernelCare is its light wieght agent which is capable of applying patcheset on linux kernel without asking for reboot of the system. Also it has suport for multiple flavour of Linux to fix its vulnerabilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While it fixes the vulnerabilities in memory by install new kernel image, if system is rebooted and KernelCare agent lose connectivery to Internet, your system is vulnerable again. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like KernelCare for its ability to apply patcsets as an fixes for CVEs on Linux servers without rebooting them. Also it has support for almost all flavors of the linux. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ePortal need to be deployed in private neworks of the customer in current architecture, if it could be hosted in the cloud it will save the management efforts on the customer end. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of use with application of patch set in few seconds. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

API interface to ePortal need to enhanced. Also result of patchset application should be improved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Quick and fastest way to fix vulnerabilities runtime. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

REST API for ePortal need to be enriched. Also patchset application result need to be improved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fixing vulnerability in one go by applying a commutative patch set from KernelCare. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The REST API support needs to be improved Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best I like about KernelCare maximizes uptime no reboot is required and boosts the vulnerability by fixing and deleting the hidden costs of maintenance windows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

They need a few upgrades like no IPv6 support, support for more operating systems, implementation cost is high and UI can be more interactive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.