HackerEarth Assessments Pros and Cons

The dashboard created by HackerEarth for consolidated results is what I love the most. Mostover, hackerearth provides option to add sample inputs and outputs via a file that makes it easy to use and proceed further. HackerEarth also provides plagiarism checker which works like magic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing that I don't like about HackerEarth is how its library feature works. I need to add a question one by one into the library. I should have an option to add a question from one of my assessment directly to the library. Moreover, HackerEarth assessments should provide an option to use open questions too. Sometimes, we don't want to build new questions. One last thing to add, HackerEarth support is very bad. They don't response correctly and in time Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Helped us in better screening at the start of the hiring process;thus helping our internal team to interview the best of best folks and fastracking the closure rates of tech hirings.Also the support team has been one of our actual backbone while setting things up.Easy to use platform both for the recruiters,hiring team and candidate as well to take tests at their suitable time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At times, copied codes could not be detected. AI can be improved to catch malpractices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have used HackerEarth starting 2013. This was during a time that codeforces, kattis, codechef, l33tcode and similar online judges were the rave of all programmers who would want to develop their programming portfolio. I have found HackerEarth assessments unique because the problems are practical and have greater applicability especially since it was at the time not afraid to publish really beginner problems and discuss in its editorials really basic programming concepts. My sense was because the other online judge platforms were trying to compete on being the best they focused on making their assessments cutting edge, HackerEarth stuck too the roots of programming knowledge and delivered scaffolding on their basics making it a nice tool for beginners to reach the point where they can start being helpful in projects and start creating value in the teams they belong to. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As per experience with hosting programming competitions since 2013, most problem setters don't really abide by the deadline for sending their problems so it could be published in the competition/assessment. A robust way to add problems to an already running instance of an assessment/competition will allow the flexibility that adapts to what's really happening on the ground. Sending 3+ followups to senior faculty/devs to send in their problems is not a pleasant experience :) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

HackerEarth Assessments is highly rated for its ease of use, comprehensive skill library, and effective proctoring features. It is particularly recommended for technical hiring and remote recruitment Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are suggestions for improving the integrated development environment (IDE) to enhance the coding experience during assessments Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about HackerEarth Assessments is the clear and concise instructions provided for each problem. The problems were easy to moderate in difficulty, which made the assessment approachable yet challenging. Additionally, the compiler was very efficient and user-friendly, ensuring a smooth coding experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While I haven't encountered any significant errors or problems with HackerEarth Assessments, I do have a suggestion for improvement. Enabling the copy and paste option for certain questions, especially those involving APIs where we need to copy code snippets, would make the process more efficient and user-friendly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think one of the best part about HackerEarth is the versatility of the type of questions and the user interface. There are coding execution questions, Descriptive questions, MCQs, etc. I've noticed that in other testing platforms, the code execution interface tends to be slow, and offers less number of languages. However this is not at all the case with HackerEarth. Also, the customer support and the ease of use is excellent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing significant that comes to my mind, however one area where there could be some improvement done is the evaluation of descriptive questions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best aspect of HackerEarth Assessments is its ease of use and wide range of features that cater to different assessment needs, making the hiring process more efficient and reliable. The detailed analytics and reporting tools help in making informed decisions quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One downside of HackerEarth Assessments is that the integration with some of our existing HR tools could be smoother. Additionally, the customer support response time could be faster during peak times to address urgent issues promptly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I was given the hackerearth assesments by various companies as the first round of shortlisting and it has questions related to different proogramming languages like SQL and Python and also had few MCQ. All of this integrated in a single assesment and evrything worked flawlessly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

i don't have any negatives on the platform. It is simple and powerful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that it's user-friendly and easy to collaborate and create an assessment from scratch! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I dislike that you cannot upload your own Excel document into it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.