HackerEarth Assessments Pricing Overview

There isn't a single best feature, as different users find different aspects most helpful. Some appreciate the AI-powered proctoring and real-time candidate monitoring, which ensures the integrity of the assessment process. Others value the wide range of programming languages and frameworks supported, allowing them to test candidates on a variety of skills. A frequent highlight is the extensive library of pre-built questions across various domains, which saves recruiters a significant amount of time. The detailed reports and analytics are also often praised for providing deep insights into a candidate's performance, helping hiring managers make data-driven decisions. Ultimately, the combination of these features makes it a robust and efficient tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I've found the platform's user interface can sometimes be a bit clunky, making it a little confusing to navigate, especially when you're first getting started. Also, the pricing can be a hurdle; it doesn't always seem to scale well for smaller companies or startups with limited budgets. While the core features are strong, I sometimes wish there were more customizable options for creating highly specific assessments that fit very unique job roles. Finally, like any complex online tool, you might run into the occasional technical issue, which can be frustrating, even if it gets fixed quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best part is how it helps us screen large pools of candidates quickly. The automated evaluation and reports save a lot of manual effort and make hiring more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some coding questions have very strict time limits, which can stress candidates. A little flexibility or better hints would improve the experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.