Top Rated Google Cloud Memorystore Alternatives
Google MemoryStore is ease tool, it is easy for me to integrate with other services, this is data base as a service, that replaced my needs from other dependent softwares. it is user friendly with many services, this process set up memory store is in google cloud service helps in many terms thanks team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
This product pricing, im not able to understand, Not able to estimate my cost accuretly, and a request to add more features and optimize the application for more better performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
48 out of 49 Total Reviews for Google Cloud Memorystore
Overall Review Sentiment for Google Cloud Memorystore
Log in to view review sentiment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Sneh S. Sneh S."
I am working on Mahindra as cloud engineer , all use case that we have on our company I will work on , like deploy application on Compute instance , GKE and pass servcie cloud run also . and data analytic part : we used cloud composer , big query , data proc cluster .. as storage we use cloud spanner , gcs , sql .. at ui and servcie side google cloud is ok , Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
google cloud ui for IAM releted not good , speed also not good network side . google team need to work on documention also . google team aslo team to wrok on avilablity of instance on all region . Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Mohit D. Mohit D."
Google Cloud Memorystore's seamless integration with Redis stands out. It offers hassle-free, fully managed caching with low-latency access and automatic scaling. Google Cloud Memorystore is a go-to solution for caching needs, especially in scenarios where low-latency access and automatic scaling are crucial. The user-friendly interface and straightforward pricing make it easy to deploy and cost-effective. Google Cloud's support is generally reliable, but occasional response times may vary. Documentation is comprehensive for self-help. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
One limitation is the lack of support for caching solutions other than Redis. Additionally, more detailed monitoring and alerting features would enhance the overall experience for proactive management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Gaurav B. Gaurav B."
Google Cloud Memorystore include its high performance and scalability, automatic failover and replication, and seamless integration with other Google Cloud services. It also offers support for popular open-source in-memory data stores like Redis and Memcached. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
some potential drawbacks of Google Cloud Memorystore may include its cost, as it can be more expensive than self-hosted solutions, and limited customization options for advanced users. Additionally, it may not be suitable for all use cases, particularly those that require very specific configurations or specialized features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Managed Redis and Memcached services.
Built-in high availability for Redis instances.
Scalability options to handle varying workloads.
Seamless integration with the Google Cloud ecosystem.
Comprehensive security features including encryption and access controls.
Automatic patch management for security updates.
Monitoring and logging capabilities for performance optimization.
Global availability with multiple deployment regions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Limited Redis features compared to self-hosted instances.
Potential vendor lock-in with Google Cloud.
Accumulated costs for high-performance Redis instances.
Data transfer costs for large data volumes.
Limited customization due to managed nature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Google Cloud Memorystore offers several impressive features.
1.I don't have to worry about infrastructure management, ensuring reliability .
2.It is highly scalable, allowing me to easily adapt to changing workloads.
3.It is compatibility with popular caching engines like Redis makes it versatile.
4.It offers low-latency access to data.
5. I can store high amount of data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Cost and service is limited to Redis.So there should be low cost so that everyone can use it .Services to the redis are few incerase it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Abhilash K. Abhilash K."
Managed caching service for seamless infrastructure management.
Ensures high availability and effortless scalability.
Offers a choice between Redis and Memcached for caching with smooth GCP integration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Cost control is essential due to potential caching expenses, especially for varying workloads.
Data durability should be addressed as data can be lost during node failures.
While ideal for Google Cloud users, integration may be less straightforward for applications on other platforms. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It help me to effectively store my data on cloud and s ave my memory on laptop while handling large size files. The user interfaces is very easy to use & it reduces dependency on other softwares. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The cost is little bit higher than other services available in the market. Sometimes for large data it is too costly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Ayush S. Ayush S."
1. Highly Scalable- It can be scaled up or down as per the needs of our application.
2. Reliable-99.99% upcale time in SLA makes it very reliable
3. Cost Effective- Very cost effective way to store in-memory data Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
1. Does not support a lot of data formats as compared to its competetiors.
2. Not effecient for applications requiring low latency and high throughput.
3. Can be very hard to manage for large and complex applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Vishal P. Vishal P."
This was my first time using a primary storage system service to manage data.it is also easy to integrate with other services like kubernetes. Top security is another advantage it offers and if you are looking to streamline your data management, this would be your best bet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is not ideal for large data. Along with proportional cost there might be a moment where you might need to rethink if its suitable if the amount of data you are assuming im gigabytes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Here are the points that I liked the most about Google Cloud Memorystore:
1.Developer-Friendly
2.Cost Efficiency
3.Managed Redis and Memcached
4.Integration with Google Cloud Ecosystem
5.Automatic Patch Management Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Somehow there are some disliked features about Google Cloud Memorystore, but these factor doesn't affect much on the main work flow:
1.Data Transfer Costs
2.Limited Redis Features
3.Limited Control
4.Dependency on Google Cloud Services Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.