Top Rated GlusterFS Alternatives
27 GlusterFS Reviews
Overall Review Sentiment for GlusterFS
Log in to view review sentiment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Alexandru B. Alexandru B."
High Availability.
Fault-tolerant.
Stability.
Great documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Good performance across a wide variety of storage needs.
Too good to be disliked! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Sergei N. Sergei N."
Speed and stability.
Easy to maintain.
Good manual. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Doesn't work on different Linux distributuves in one cluster as expected.
Ubuntu + Ubuntu - OK
Ubuntu + CentOS - NOK Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Brian B. Brian B."
It is a reliable distributed filesystem for high availability scenarios. It does this well. O er low latencies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It sometimes in my experience uses a high amount of memory. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Ease of management and configuration and performance are the two things that really made us to use it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Troubleshooting performance issues is hard Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It performs surprisingly well (when it's working). It's also able to scale considerably (horizontal as well as vertical). At best, it's transparent to the applications that depend on it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The auto-heal isn't reliable and the process to manually intervene is painful, not exact, and does not scale. Performance suffers when the volumes aren't at 100% health. If underlying I/O isn't consistent the volume can wobble. Community support isn't all that impressive. I will NOT choose GlusterFS for my next deployment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="David A. David A."
It is very easy to manage, has a simple cli and almost no maintenance. It also runs on commodity hardware, enterprise servers and cloud (VPS) with no issues. This was the solution we adopted to distribute data in a virtual datacenter some time ago and we faced no issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It uses a quorum mechanism to decide what data is up-to-date and what node wins when "writing". This has it's pros and cons. On the upside, it simplifies the process to manage the cluster of servers in the system: you add servers as you go. On the down side, you need to provision a minimum of 3 servers and a good link between them: if you access a file that's not in the node it has to contact the node that has the actual data (as a proxy) while the data is replicated on the node. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.