Foxit PDF Editor Reviews & Product Details

I handle many patient documents like lab reports, ultrasound reports, and discharge summaries. I use Foxit PDF Editor to open and review these files quickly. It is easy to use, and I was able to start using it without much training.

I often highlight important findings and add short notes while reviewing reports. It is also useful for writing online prescriptions and making small corrections when needed. The merge option helps me combine multiple reports into one file, which makes patient records easier to manage. As a medical educator, I also use it to prepare medical notes and mark important topics for teaching students. I use it regularly during the day, and it works smoothly with other systems we use, so managing files feels simple. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One small issue I notice is when working with scanned patient files that have many pages, sometimes the text is not perfectly clear for selection, so highlighting specific lines can take a little extra effort. This usually happens with older scanned reports.

Also, when I open very large combined patient files, the first loading can take a few extra seconds.

Overall, these are minor issues, and they do not affect my regular work in a big way. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recently I have used some of the most advanced feature of Foxit pdf editor and this software has now split, merging and reordering pages feature for complete control documents management. It also helps us in editing scanned documents for extra resources and time saving in our business. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have been using Foxit pdf editor from quite a while now and my observation on this software is that the new users face challenges in accessing all the advance features. Also they struggle a lot to find the required tool for themselves so I would recommend their developers to provide training sessions for their new users Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Foxit PDF Editor has introduced several useful improvements recently. One of the standout features is its enhanced AI powered tools, which make summarizing, rewriting, and extracting key information from PDFs much faster and more efficient. The interface also feels more streamlined and responsive, improving overall usability. Additionally, the collaboration features, such as commenting and shared reviews, have become more intuitive, making it easier for teams to work together on documents. The improved performance and faster loading times are also a big plus for day to day use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Foxit PDF Editor is a strong tool overall, but there are a few areas for improvement. The interface can feel a bit complex for new users, and some advanced features are limited to higher tier plans. Performance can slow down with large or complex files, and real time collaboration could be more seamless. Improving OCR accuracy and simplifying the overall user experience would make it even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I still like the general ease to use Foxit considering as with any vendor, there are going to be differences, which is not always a bad thing. So for this part, I would say unchanged. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only other issue if any and I understand is this concept of when you purchase a perpetual license, that if anything, I know things change and releases change with that. But to get to the point where things don't work so well later, is the thing I'm finding when now with a number of these individual licenses that we prefer to use, that I have some on one version versus another on another version. So not only do I have to note when a user's having an issue where I might need to repair or even uninstall and reinstall the application, there's no clear indication of which version to use until I go back to the original purchase of the license. Other than that, I can deal with that but just wondering if other administrators or users have the same concerns of always having to keep up with another software version and I don't want to end up having to purchase another license for a user that has had a license, to basically make that original license null and void. Other than that, we're good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Been using Adobe for years but there was an issue with my legacy program (15 yrs old) that they would not help me with ... so I found FOXIT, and IMHO, it is a better user experience than I had with Adobe. Anyone who does not want to pay adobe exorbitant costs WILL be happy with FOXIT ... at least same and I think better set up if you use some of FOXIT's shortcuts and use the task bar effectively. I'm so happy I chose FOXIT. FOXIT is easy to use, even for a newbie beginner on the software Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I know you will hate me saying this, but in the first moth / 6 weeks I've used FOXIT haven't found any weaknesses. I use it for editing pdfs, creating images and so on, and haven't come across any issues, except (maybe) that some of the tools are difficult to find on the menu bar where all the functions live. Probably with continuing use I'll find where they are and it will become second nature. It's a learning curve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the most impressive strengths of Foxit PDF Editor is its highly intuitive design. The interface feels thoughtfully arranged—commands and tools appear exactly where a user would naturally expect them, reducing the learning curve and keeping workflows smooth and efficient.

Foxit also demonstrates a remarkable ability to anticipate user needs. When you’re navigating within a folder or viewing multiple PDFs, the software proactively offers relevant suggestions—such as prompting you to combine files—eliminating unnecessary steps and saving time.

The COMMENT tab is another standout element. It’s streamlined to include only the tools essential for review and markup, free of unnecessary clutter. Everything feels purposeful, direct, and engineered for productivity.

Another major advantage is Foxit's value. Compared to Adobe Acrobat, Foxit offers a far more budget‑friendly pricing structure without sacrificing core functionality. Adobe Acrobat Pro runs at approximately $239.88/year per user, while Foxit PDF Editor comes in at approximately $129.99/year per user—making Foxit a significantly more affordable choice for individuals and businesses alike while still delivering excellent performance and features.

Overall, Foxit PDF Editor provides a smart, intuitive, and cost‑effective solution that “thinks along with you,” minimizes effort, and maximizes productivity—making it an excellent alternative to more expensive PDF editors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As the software coordinator for our company, managing Foxit’s licensing and seat assignments can be challenging. The system presents multiple reference numbers, identifiers, and codes that often feel redundant or unclear. This abundance of similar‑looking data makes it easy to get tangled in the details, and even after careful review, it can still be difficult to feel fully confident that you’re interpreting the correct information. A more streamlined and transparent licensing interface—ideally with consolidated identifiers and clearer mapping between licenses and assigned users—would significantly reduce confusion and improve administrative efficiency. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It loads quickly and opens files fast. It also makes it easy for me to annotate, edit, and manage my PDF files. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So far, none. That doesn’t mean it’s perfect, but my needs are basic PDF editing and reading in a way that feels like I’m reading a hard-copy book, along with annotating and highlighting. It has done that job perfectly for me. So, no—there’s nothing I didn’t like. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Due to its performance and speed, it does not consume much RAM, handles extensive documents with great fluidity, and is ideal for any environment, whether it be Educational, Commercial, or Governmental, as the learning curve of its environment is very intuitive and comfortable to use. As for integrations, it's as simple as using Word or Excel. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Suddenly, regarding fonts, I have occasionally had difficulties changing them correctly since they are not embedded in the original document. At times, I have also had a bit of trouble using forms previously created in Adobe. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Snapshot tool is really nice and convenient feature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

After several months of use, here are some of the downsides of this software:

Frequent and intrusive update popups that do not work when “Update Now” is selected

The software crashes more often than other well established platforms

The drawing tools could be improved Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Foxit PDF Editor is how fast and lightweight it feels. It opens PDF files quickly and does not slow down my system, even when the file size is large. Editing text, adding comments, or highlighting content is very easy and straightforward. I don't need much time to understand where things are. The layout feels practical, not confusing. It does the main job well without forcing unnecessary features in front of me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I don't like is that some useful features are locked behind paid plans, which can be limiting at times. Also, the interface can feel slightly crowded when many tools are enabled, especially for new users. Sometimes advanced options take a bit of searching to find. It's not a big issue, but the experience could be smoother with better tool organization. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.