Flow Engineering Reviews (11)

Reviews

Flow Engineering Reviews (11)

5.0
11 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Users consistently praise the ease of use and intuitive interface of Flow Engineering, which allows teams to quickly integrate and start delivering value without extensive training. The tool's flexibility and responsive customer support further enhance the user experience, making it a preferred choice for requirements management. Some users note that frequent updates can lead to minor bugs, but these are typically resolved swiftly.
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Verified User in Automotive
UA
Verified User in Automotive
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"By far the best requirements tool for mid-sized teams"
5/5
What do you like best about Flow Engineering?

I have never ever used a tool before that all my engineers were happy to use rather than having to delegate it to one person to learn the tool and make the updates. The individual teams making their own updates in the tool makes our entire process outside of requirements so much more streamlined. The dashboards within the tool really seem like an accurate portrayal of what is really happening day to day in the team, which I could never have said about any of the tools I've used before (codebeamer, JAMA, DOORS, etc). Dynamic linking across platforms (Flow -> CAD -> Excel / Matlab functions) meant that changes were more easily seen and their impacts on requirements were immediately visible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Flow Engineering?

It took a couple of chats with the Flow team before I managed to fully get the Python/GitHub integration working, although some of the people using the files every day had an easier time than me. Adopting Flow effectively required a shift in mindset, but once you get it, it is difficult to go back. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.