I love that Fin can pull content from articles or previous responses to provide customers with accurate and up to date answers. Using Fin has been very beneficial to our Support Team, and it is always an easy experience when I have a question for Intercom's Support Team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fin is very useful to questions that have a straight forward answer, but of course, cannot work as well when there is an issue that requires investigation. Often we can find ourselves caught in a loop of the bot trying to troubleshoot an issue that it cannot help with. Within our Support Team, we have built a workflow to counter this problem - but I often find this with the Intercom bot as well, even after you ask to speak with a human directly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fin allows my team to focus on high value initiatives while it handles basic support queries that can be easily resolved by AI.

Intercom invests a lot in this technology and puts it at the core of their product which is reassuring for the foreseeable future.

It's relatively easy to set up and if your knowledge base is strong and optimized for AI, you can expect very good results in terms of autonomous resolution of support tickets. (Help Center) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The cost can quickly add up as you are being charged by resolution as opposed to a flat unlimited monthly rate, which can make it hard to anticipate. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best are High automation & scale

Fin can handle a lot of first‑level support automatically — repetitive questions, triage, basic troubleshooting — freeing up human agents for more complex tasks. This means faster response times and more consistent support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike is Accuracy on niche/specific questions is lower Fin depends a lot on how well your help‑docs / knowledge base cover a topic. If your content isn’t clear, detailed, or well‑structured, Fin may misunderstand or give incomplete answers. Users report that for edge‑cases or very particular product questions, Fin sometimes “hallucinates” or has to be rescued by a human. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Fin by Intercom for replying to customer emails, and it handles common basic questions, saving me time. I like its ease of use and how it adapts to knowledge when fed. The multi-usage feature is great, allowing use with WhatsApp and Messenger. The AI functionality is a strong point, and it's more easy to use compared to other products we've tried. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't like that the Intercom languages for the Middle East aren't displayed correctly. They start from right to left, but Intercom only goes from left to right. Also, i would prefer Fin to react to direct messages only (if we could have this option), for the moment it replies to all including Re and Fwd as well which is not necessary. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fin now feels more like a team member. The new sections allow fine-tuning of Fin to a great extent, and they allow easy administration of FIN for non-technical CS folks. Wonderful reference documentation and support is a big plus. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes your organization’s ecosystem is disparate, and FIN may not be able to join all the dots and see the big picture. Constant evolution and change in the feature set mean CS needs to stay one step ahead to ensure they get the maximum out of the platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Fin by Intercom for our help desk, and I really like how fast it is at answering our clients' questions. I'm happy with the other AI features within Fin that are helpful for our clients and assist with our overall infrastructure. I also find it great for editing messages to be more professional, and I love that we can input some of our documentation for faster responses. The initial setup was very easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are some things that Fin would tell the clients that aren't based on our release notes. It should only read what we give it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fin has great UI, it works extremely well for basic questions, providing intelligent, customised answers for customers that a human support agent could not produce so quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It can’t handle end-to-end needs easily for a startup in the position we’re in, especially since we’re using a clunky in-house admin system that can’t be integrated. That isn’t Fin’s fault, but it’s still a limitation for me. When I trialled Fin, the responses it produced also weren’t as intelligent as I’d expected. We have two very different customer bases, and it mixed them up quite a lot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Fin by Intercom for customer service, and we're getting positive feedback from customers. I really like that it shares a lot of information and even screenshots with the customers, and it adds full instructions too. This means only complex issues get escalated to a human agent, giving them more time to assist with any bugs or complex problems that customers experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it has issues with understanding Hebrew and then it gives the wrong information to the customer. When it gives the wrong information, the customer takes the wrong action, and it confuses them. The initial setup took some time because we don't have integrations, so I had to add a lot of info to Fin by Intercom. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I can’t say I have any positive experiences to talk about Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My experience with Fin by Intercom was pretty terrible. It led me down at least one rabbit hole that was clearly incorrect, leaving a bad review on the App Store to complain about my bug. I have a trust issue with it since it led me down the wrong path. I don’t find anything about it to be helpful at this point and it’s scared me away from ever wanting to use it with my own customers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the automation and the escalation metrics in Fin by Intercom. Everything is pretty much easy and super intuitive, and I appreciate that you don't have to do any specific training per se. All we needed to do was create our help center and ensure that Fin had access to the content, which made learning easy. I think it's intelligent too, making suggestions for content not even in the help center. I enjoy its knowledge level and how intuitive it is. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Okay. I don't know if this is a Fin issue or an actual Intercom system issue. But because we have just the one, Intercom email forwarding address, so what Fin does is it replies to every email because we have Fin turned on for email. It replies to every email that comes into that one centralized address. Despite the fact that I created a workflow that is basically supposed to omit a team from the response. So I think I don't like the fact that we don't get to pick what channels our responses go through, specifically the email. We get to customize mostly within Messenger. So I think we need more email support in terms of customization and how we intend to implement that. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.