Top Rated Figaro Alternatives
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Jayachandra P. Jayachandra P."
Figaro is very easy to use and hase nice interface.It's ability to provide reasoning algorithms for probabilistic programming and business cases to be highly useful. It is a reliable tool for managing secrets on Heroku with business-focused functionalities Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Figaro is lacking community support . Figaro has a nice interface and easy to use but it has limited features and it's interface can be improved. When compared to similar software it's performance is little bit slow Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
10 out of 11 Total Reviews for Figaro
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Raksha S. Raksha S."
By using Figaro, I found some excellent benefits like:
Figaro allows for the flexible modeling of complex systems, making it a powerful tool for many probabilistic modeling tasks.
Figaro is written in Scala, which is a highly scalable programming language. This makes it well-suited for large-scale probabilistic modeling projects.
It is open-source software, which means it is free to use and can be modified and distributed by anyone.
It can be used as a standalone library or integrated with other Scala libraries and tools, making it a versatile tool for probabilistic modeling.
It has an active community of developers and users who contribute to the development and use of the library. This can provide support and resources for users who are new to the library.
It has been designed to be efficient and fast in performing probabilistic inference, and it is optimized for large-scale models. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
While using Figaro, I came across few disadvantages which I would like to list down here:
Figaro is a powerful tool, but it can be complex, especially for users new to probabilistic programming.
Figaro's performance is slower than other probabilistic programming languages, such as Church.
It is not yet optimized for large-scale probabilistic models or high-dimensional data.
It also has a smaller community compared to other probabilistic programming languages such as PyMC3 or Stan.
However, it is worth noting that these are just potential disadvantages of Figaro, and whether or not they apply to a specific use case depends on the particular requirements of the project at hand. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What I like best about Figaro is its declarative syntax. This makes it very easy to write probabilistic models, and I find it much more intuitive than some of the other probabilistic programming languages out there. It also has some very useful features like automatic inference, which make it much easier to reason about models with uncertainty. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I haven't encountered any major issues with Figaro yet, but one minor issue I have is the lack of documentation. It would be nice if there were more tutorials and resources available to help people get started with the language. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="SHUBHAM A. SHUBHAM A."
Figaro is great software; one thing i like about it is it's interface. Helps in optimising a lot of probabilistic problems smoothly. Also it's business-focused ability is awesome feature. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Well, it is great software, but the thing which Figaro lack is its community support. I love interface but there is always room for improvement. so it can also be improved because its not easy for beginner. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Vishakha K. Vishakha K."
The Easy to use a feature of Figaro is best. This is the one which anyone can use to get the best of it. The amount of time it need is very less compared to any other. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The UI and the presentation of stuff around the application are too challenging to understand the first time of use. Other than that, everything is excellent. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I like the Figaro because it is easy to navigate and has a smooth user interface. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The things I do not like about Figaro:
1. It is a bit complex in use. Need some technical expertise to handle it properly.
2. Minimal features available. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="PRANAV S. PRANAV S."
The reasoning algorithms that are provided are really helpful with development activities and to arrive at reasonable conclusions Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Nothing to highlight as a dislike as this serves its purpose! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
If you are looking for one stop solution for reasoning algorithms, and want to give rich models, which are rich probabilistic models. Then Figaro is your tool you are looking for. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Figaro has everything that you need like reasoning algorithms which gives you a great insight and draw useful conclusion. There is nothing which I don't like and it supports most of the requirements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Figaro is one of the best tool for probabilistic programming and its use in buisness cases is unmatchable. It gives reasoning algorithms for your uses. Overall this app is all you need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Figaro is one of the best tools out there and there is everything good about it, so it fulfills my require but it can be made more smoother. This overall gives a good experience to me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Mark M. Mark M."
Ease of use of setup was great, I was using Figaro for a relatively simple app with relatively simple secrets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Not sure how easy it would be to encrypt/decrypt the secrets themselves each time they are read, which is where something more heavyweight like jasypt offers. In other words, it's definitely not as feature rich as comparable products Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Anirudh K. Anirudh K."