Compare this with other toolsSave it to your board and evaluate your options side by side.
Save to board

EDB for PostgreSQL Reviews & Product Details

Value at a Glance

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

3 months

Product Avatar Image

Have you used EDB for PostgreSQL before?

Answer a few questions to help the EDB for PostgreSQL community

EDB for PostgreSQL Reviews (90)

Reviews

EDB for PostgreSQL Reviews (90)

4.4
90 reviews

Review Summary

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Users consistently praise the high availability and reliable support provided by EDB for PostgreSQL, which enhances their database management experience. The product is valued for its enterprise-grade features that simplify complex tasks and improve performance, making it suitable for mission-critical applications. However, some users note that the licensing costs can be high, which may deter smaller teams.

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Dharamveer p.
DP
Application Security Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Reliable and scalable enterprise database solution built on PostgreSQL"
What do you like best about EDB for PostgreSQL?

What I like best about EDB for PostgreSQL is its enterprise level capabilities built on top of PostgreSQL. It provides strong performance, reliability, and scalability while still keeping the flexibility of open source. I especially like the advanced security features, high availability options, and compatibility with Oracle, which makes migration easier for organizations. It also supports complex workloads efficiently, which is useful for large scale applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL?

What I dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL is that the setup and configuration can be a bit complex, especially for teams that are new to PostgreSQL or enterprise database environments. Some advanced features require proper understanding and tuning, which may take time. Also, licensing costs can be a concern compared to fully open source alternatives. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Parthasarathy  T.
PT
Senior Associate Infrastructure
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Flexible PostgreSQL with Enterprise-Grade Support, Reliability, and Migration Tools"
What do you like best about EDB for PostgreSQL?

What I like best about EDB for PostgreSQL is how it combines the flexibility of open‑source PostgreSQL with strong enterprise-level support and reliability. The platform offers robust tools for high availability, security, and performance tuning, which are critical for production workloads. It’s especially valuable for organisations migrating from legacy databases like Oracle while still staying PostgreSQL‑compatible Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL?

What I dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL is that the licensing and overall cost can feel high compared to native or cloud‑managed PostgreSQL options. Some advanced features are tied to proprietary components, which reduces flexibility for teams that prefer fully open‑source solutions. There can also be a learning curve when working with EDB‑specific tools and configurations Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Subhajit P.
SP
Sr. Civil Engineer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Enterprise-Grade Reliability with Room for UI Improvement"
What do you like best about EDB for PostgreSQL?

I use EDB for PostgreSQL primarily as a robust and enterprise-grade database solution for managing structured data in business applications. Its advanced security features, high availability options, and performance optimization tools make it suitable for critical applications where reliability is important. I particularly appreciate its high availability features like replication and failover, which help ensure minimal downtime. The Oracle compatibility is another big advantage, as it simplifies migration and reduces the learning curve when working across different database systems. Additionally, the built-in tools for monitoring, backup, and performance tuning make database management much easier compared to handling everything manually. The security features are also robust, which is important when dealing with critical or sensitive data. Overall, it strikes a good balance between power, scalability, and ease of management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL?

While EDB for PostgreSQL is a strong and reliable platform, there are a few areas that could be improved. The initial setup and configuration can be a bit complex, especially for users who are new to PostgreSQL or enterprise database environments. It often requires a good level of expertise to fully utilize all features. The user interface for some of the management and monitoring tools could be more intuitive and modern. Compared to some newer database platforms, navigation and usability can feel slightly less user-friendly. Licensing and cost can also be a concern for smaller teams, particularly when compared to the fully open-source version of PostgreSQL. While the enterprise features justify the cost, it may still be a barrier for some organizations. Additionally, documentation and troubleshooting resources, while comprehensive, can sometimes be difficult to navigate when trying to resolve specific issues quickly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

suon s.
SS
IAMS Water Management Specialist
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Security and Scalability Shine, but Licensing Costs Hinder"
What do you like best about EDB for PostgreSQL?

I appreciate EDB for PostgreSQL for its secure, scalable, and enterprise-ready platform, which centralizes fragmented infrastructure data in Cambodia's water resources and irrigation sector. I like the ability to connect enterprise-grade capabilities with practical adaptability, making it suitable for this sector. I enjoy its reliability and how it integrates seamlessly with modern tools and data types, supporting geospatial data, JSON, and XML integration, which works very well when connecting survey inventories with GIS maps, running predictive models for water allocation, and simulating hydraulic flows directly within the database. Using EDB for PostgreSQL as the central data backbone, I've paired it with tools like GIS platforms (ArcGIS, QGIS), CAD software (AutoCAD), analytics dashboards (Power BI, Tableau), hydraulic modeling tools (HEC-RAS, SWAT, MIKE Hydro), and a mobile survey app (IAMS), creating an integrated ecosystem for Cambodia's irrigation asset management system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL?

For Cambodia's water resources and irrigation sector, EDB for PostgreSQL's main drawback were its licensing costs, proprietary features that risk vendor lock-in, and the training burden for local teams. Its enterprise complexity can feel heavy compared to community PostgreSQL, and localization gaps mean extra customization is needed to fit rural workflows and national governance systems. Thus, while it delivered reliability and scalability, affordability, simplicity, and local adaptation remain areas for improvement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Vineet  K.
VK
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Enterprise-Grade Power with PL/SQL Compatibility"
What do you like best about EDB for PostgreSQL?

I love that EDB for PostgreSQL takes the stress out of managing mission-critical Postgres by providing a full-stack enterprise experience that community versions just can't match. The multi-master replication via EDB Postgres Distributed is a complete game-changer, allowing me to achieve five-nines availability and perform rolling maintenance without typical failover anxiety. I'm a huge fan of the native Oracle compatibility, which treats PL/SQL as a first-class citizen and saves me months of refactoring during migrations. Their integrated security suite, including built-in SQL injection protection and data redaction, coupled with 24/7 access to some of the world's top Postgres contributors, transforms the database into a robust, high-performance platform that I can actually scale and defend. I also appreciate how EDB has built a cohesive ecosystem for modern workloads through their CloudNativePG operator and AI integration. Their Kubernetes implementation handles automated failover, scaling, and backups with precision, making running Postgres in containers feel like a managed service. The Postgres AI platform works incredibly well for teams trying to consolidate their stacks; running columnar analytics and vector searches within the same environment means I can support both business intelligence and generative AI features without building complex pipelines to external data warehouses. It's this combination of rock-solid traditional database management and forward-thinking tools for developers that makes it a standout choice for an evolving enterprise environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL?

While EDB is a powerhouse for enterprise Postgres, there are definitely areas that can be a headache for an engineer. One of the biggest friction points is the pricing and licensing model; because it is often tied to vCPU counts, costs can spiral quickly as you scale or add standby nodes for resilience, making long-term budget forecasting a bit of a moving target. From a technical standpoint, while the Oracle compatibility is excellent, it is not a 1:1 perfect match, and hitting that final 5-10% of niche features like advanced queuing or specific proprietary packages often requires frustrating manual workarounds. The learning curve for advanced features like EDB Postgres Distributed is also quite steep, and the documentation can sometimes feel fragmented or less comprehensive than the community Postgres wiki, making troubleshooting complex mesh configurations difficult. Finally, the proprietary nature of some features can create a sense of vendor lock-in; if you ever want to move back to community Postgres, untangling yourself from EDB-specific enhancements like redacted views or PL/SQL wrappers can be a significant architectural burden. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Artee Y.
AY
Health Intelligence Expert (Product Data Scientist)
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Reliable, Scalable, But Costly"
What do you like best about EDB for PostgreSQL?

I appreciate using EDB for PostgreSQL at Novartis as a reliable database platform, handling structured data for clinical studies and analytics. It gives us the confidence to run PostgreSQL at scale securely and compliantly, which is crucial for workloads connected to WNS and enterprise reporting tools. I like that it integrates smoothly with AWS and Power BI, allowing us to run PostgreSQL at scale with the necessary reliability and support for enterprise analytics and reporting. EDB fits well with our cloud and analytical setup, supporting large-scale reporting and data use cases. The initial setup was fairly straightforward since we already had PostgreSQL experience and cloud infrastructure in place. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL?

To be honest, license and infrastructure costs. Licensing based on vCPUs means costs increase as databases scale, especially with distributed configurations. Standby nodes improve resilience but also increase infrastructure and licensing cost. Estimating long term costs upfront is challenging. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Kiran K.
KK
Specialist - Product Engineer
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Revolutionizes Enterprise Workloads with High Availability and AI Integration"
What do you like best about EDB for PostgreSQL?

I like the seamless unification of high-availability features with enterprise-grade tools in EDB for PostgreSQL, which makes production deployments effortless. The Postgres Distributed (PGD) feature is a standout for geo-distributed apps by providing five-nines uptime through automatic failover and low-latency replication, ensuring zero interruptions during peak loads. The PL/SQL compatibility is fantastic for easing Oracle migrations, saving us months by avoiding costly rewrites and preserving performance. The pgvector extensions are great for AI/ML workloads, offering 4x faster vector queries and eliminating data silos, plus it seamlessly handles Kubernetes-native scaling for microservices. The encryption and auditing features ensure compliance, especially for finance fraud detection and healthcare records. Overall, its enterprise reliability and cost savings stand out, making it an attractive choice for scaling beyond vanilla Postgres. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL?

While EDB for PostgreSQL is robust, its Postgres Distributed (PGD) setup can be complex for initial configuration in dynamic Kubernetes environments, requiring more automation tweaks. The pgvector extensions, though performant, sometimes lag in handling ultra-high-dimensional vectors (over 10k dims) without custom tuning, compared to dedicated vector DBs. PL/SQL compatibility covers 90% of Oracle workloads but misses niche advanced queuing features, needing workarounds during migrations. Management tools could improve UI intuitiveness for monitoring geo-clusters at scale. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Manuel Yeison S.
MS
Application Development Using .NET and C# in Enterprise Solutions: Professional Framework
"Stable and Reliable Database Management Solution"
What do you like best about EDB for PostgreSQL?

I use EDB for PostgreSQL on my desktop as a relational database system to design, store, and manage structured data. I appreciate its reliability as an enterprise-grade database for managing structured data. It’s very stable and reliable for these purposes. The SQL query tool is something I use constantly to write, test, and optimize queries, joins, constraints, relationships, and schemas, which helps me to model data correctly. The setup process is straightforward; the installer guides you step-by-step, with most of the configuration handled by a clear setup wizard. EDB for PostgreSQL is a powerful, reliable PostgreSQL environment with strong enterprise features, especially valuable for learning and development. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL?

The interface can feel a bit complex for beginners and takes time to get used to. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Kiran B.
KB
Technical Support Engineer II
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Easy Integration and Smooth Migrations with EnterpriseDB EDB for PostgreSQL"
What do you like best about EDB for PostgreSQL?

What I like best is how easy EnterpriseDB EDB for PostgreSQL integrates with existing systems. Many of our customers were already using PostgreSQL or Oracle, so migration and setup was not very complicated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL?

initial setup and understanding of some enterprise features takes little time, especially if team is new to EnterpriseDB EDB for PostgreSQL. Documentation is there, but sometimes not very straightforward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RITIK B.
RB
AI Software Developer
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Great capabilities, but proprietary features add cost, complexity, and vendor lock-in"
What do you like best about EDB for PostgreSQL?

What I appreciate most about EDB for PostgreSQL is the combination of enterprise-grade security, robust high-availability features, and exceptional technical support. These enhancements provide the stability and performance needed for mission-critical applications, while the compatibility tools make scaling and managing complex database infrastructures significantly more efficient and reliable than using standard PostgreSQL alone. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about EDB for PostgreSQL?

The least helpful thing about EDB for PostgreSQL is its proprietary extensions and enterprise-only features that force licensing costs and create vendor lock-in, making it far less appealing than free, fully open-source vanilla PostgreSQL for most users. The downsides include added complexity from custom tooling that often feels unnecessary, slower uptake of upstream community fixes, and limited community support compared to standard Postgres. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

3 months

Return on Investment

8 months

Average Discount

11%

EDB for PostgreSQL Features
Storage
Availability
Stability
Data Types
Languages
Database Locking
Access Control
Disaster Recovery
Workload Management
Query Optimizer
Product Avatar Image
EDB for PostgreSQL