Top Rated D2iQ Alternatives
10 out of 11 Total Reviews for D2iQ
D2IQ core asset is its ability to operate Kubernetes clusters in many environments like cloud computing and local servers. The flexiblity gives me the centralized control panel to manage all my deployments that are Kubernetes-based and as a result, simplifies management and reduces the level of complexity Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
D2IQ does possess that high learning curve in comparison with some other Kubernetes platforms. A cluster set-up and its management took up more time than communicated in the beginning because there were no good available and easy-to-use documents. As there are articles and pieces of materials, the best option would be to synergize them into the ultimate guide that can help bosses especially new bosses. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
D2iQ needs to provide reliability when it comes to managing our data infrastructure. Their platform does not automate tasks consuming us time and resources. The monitoring system they provide does not ensure disruptions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It does not allow us to focus on our core business operations. Their customer support team is unresponsive and does not promptly solve any concerns we have. I do have some reservations, about D2iQs customer support. It often takes them a while to respond. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Andrew K. Andrew K."
I love that I can spin up a cluster using industry-standard tools in minutes and, without any configuration, have a centralized dashboard and logging capability for all my managed k8s clusters. Also, once installed, you communicate with your clusters the same way you are used to, i.e. using kubectl. It's this none wrapping of open source technologies that I think makes D2iQ stand out from its competitors. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
There is not much that I dislike about D2iQ's offering, but if I had to point out something, it might be their documentation. Although they have better documentation than some other companies, they could certainly improve on the sections that explain in detail how their platform works. They do have great regular blog posts that go into a lot of this, but collating a lot of this into a single place would be a great idea. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Data driven app development and container features. Interoperability with multiple cloud service providers, containers (Docker for e.g.) and Virtual services.
Additionally, interoperability with other container development engines is a huge plus. For e.g. you could have docker containers but still be able to use DC/OS to manage and orchestrate them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Performance - Stability, reliability and compatibility issues in 1.8 version. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Support of several frameworks for scheduling different kinds of workloads and it's 2 level scheduling which results in great efficiency for managing resources. Service discovery, informative dashboards are well designed. Most of the essential features for running containers like service discovery, autoscaling, application configuration, and secrets management etc were out of the box and well designed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The CLI is not very robust and UI for marathon framework was very buggy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Syed Zainul A. Syed Zainul A."
The container view feature is amazing.We can add as many services on the top of core OS and it won't budge.Another great feature is the whole source code is open source,so we can peek into or change the code according to the need.Also fast data transfer,there is less headache to restarting and thinking about the corrupted data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
We can have other options with less/more features like this on the options as well.Also there is no build in application stack we can choose from for frameworks like flask,django,bottle,react,node. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The capability of dcos to provide open source technology under a supported umbrella which fits production use Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Business charge back reporting not available and latest technology comes with a bit of delay Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Adam . Adam ."
It's highly configurable, flexible and great looking piece of software. DC/OS is based on few well know and proven Open Source projects like marathon, mesos, docker, ha-proxy and many others. It guarantee that everything is well tested and even with free version you can find a log of community support if you encounter problems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Web UI looks great but it still need some work if it's about reliability and services state accuracy. Documentation about some low level mechanisms is missing, external user sources like Acitve Directory are available only in payed version. It's hard to deploy a lot of application at once. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.