AWS Fargate Pros and Cons

The best about AWS service is that::

1)AWS provides very vast services related to storage , servers, firewalls, networking , security .

2)AWS has good scalability, cost effective , it has good flexibilty .

its has different regions and has good availabity zones which helps with latency issues.

3)AWS provides good security for cloud it has Identity Access Management system , where datas can be protected and different users can be provided with different access and policies.

4)AWS has good security compliance.

5)AWS provided good intergartion when in comes in terms of migration and while deployment of different application using AWS services its lot easier.

6)AWS provides good documentation on its services .

7)AWS cloud provided proper updates on its services and if any new services are included proper webinars are conducted and the process and serices are explained. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Only the thing i dislike about AWS is naming of its services its not easier to find a service related to a particular search and naming its terms .

like example suppose S3 any new fresher wont be able to identify it as a storage service and the related term bucket it should have something named related to storage.

like other services like lightsail we wont know it is severless if you are a fresher. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The Fargate will take care of the auto sacling policy and deploy it, we can provide the container that how much of cpu and ram to be allowted to the container inside the fargate application Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Mainly we have to enable the autoscalling option in fargate if else it will it will stauck at some point if the traffic is high Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ITS THE COMPATABILITY WITH ECS..EKS

Fast and enough to run and manage applications and infrastructure.

It's ability to enhance location enabled workforce systematically.

Compatability to enhance fast and secure memory and resources management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Technical support fees,

Soft technology enhancement

It's service limits.

Unaware about data redundancy and security.Require enhancement for large area testing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Best thing about AWS Fargate is there is no hassle to set up any Ec2 instance all the manual configuration hassle. Fargate abstracts all the server configuration and users do not need to provision or manage any servers.

Users just need to specify the CPU and memory requirements for their containers, and AWS automatically provisions the necessary compute resources to meet those requirements.

On running servers that requires no down time aws fargate is the best choice for it.

It can scale in no time and cost efficent Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pricing part of aws fargate is a little complex you can check thier document for more info.

You willl have less control over your infrastructure as aws allocate and deallocate the containers independently low level stuff is handled by aws only. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Best cloud service provider as it is 100% on-time and less latency Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

UI is a part which can be improved, if UI is good then it is great! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ease of creating/managing resources be it serverless or managed by us. We migrated the old architecutere to AWS using various services like DMS, Step functions, Lambda, ECS, SNS,SQS,Redshift etc. The integration/implementation process was quite easy and stable. As a team we used to focus more on logic rather than worrying about the infrastructure. Within a year we were able to migrate everything to AWS. We used the new Architecture everyday from ingestion to reporting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There were scenarios where the lambda services were not able to invoke other resources which led to data loss. but after connecting to the customer support team we could analyze the issue and with the suggestions of the support team could see to it that the same issue does not arises again. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We can instantly deploy our applications on the AWS Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

pricing of the AWS Cloud in some of the serices like Lambda, etc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

They offere verything at overpriced cost we did Elastic Serach hosting 10K a month moved away from aws cost is 800 a month at better perfomance, someone got access to a key at somepoint we rotated but the account kept getting comprosied and missused we raised 30 tickets to AWS no one care and end up us leaving as a billg over 60K came due to this, where as we didn't consume any of the 60K and again aws didn't care at all... Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If you like to pay 10X more for nothing, get no support or pay for a support that goes in circle go for AWS.... we moved to GCP instead which is 10X better... AWS wonder why people uses it? Burning VC money maybe. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Fargate abstracts away the complexity of managing servers, clusters, and container orchestration platforms. You only need to define your containerized application's resources and requirements, and AWS takes care of the rest, including scaling, monitoring, and updates.With Fargate, you pay only for the resources your containers use while they are running. This granular billing model can be more cost-effective than traditional VM-based approaches, where you may need to pay for idle resources.Fargate supports both Amazon Elastic Container Service (ECS) and Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS), giving you the flexibility to choose the container orchestration platform that best suits your needs.AWS Fargate automatically scales your containerized applications based on demand, allowing you to handle varying workloads without manual intervention.Since AWS handles infrastructure management and scaling, your DevOps team can focus on application development and deployment rather than maintaining and updating underlying infrastructure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While the serverless nature of Fargate is a benefit for many users, it might be a drawback for those who require more control over the underlying infrastructure. With Fargate, you have less visibility into the server layer, which could be a concern for applications with specific hardware requirements or for users who prefer managing their infrastructure directly.While the serverless nature of Fargate is a benefit for many users, it might be a drawback for those who require more control over the underlying infrastructure. With Fargate, you have less visibility into the server layer, which could be a concern for applications with specific hardware requirements or for users who prefer managing their infrastructure directly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy container or long running task deployment with monitoring included Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Costly over the hours rate an instance might need to take in long term run per days Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.