Best Software for 2025 is now live!

Top 10 Autodesk CFD Alternatives & Competitors

(31)4.3 out of 5

Autodesk CFD is not the only option for Simulation & CAE Software. Explore other competing options and alternatives. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Autodesk CFD include design and user interface. The best overall Autodesk CFD alternative is SimScale. Other similar apps like Autodesk CFD are Ansys Fluent, SolidWorks Flow Simulation, OpenFOAM, and COMSOL Multiphysics®. Autodesk CFD alternatives can be found in Simulation & CAE Software but may also be in Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD) Software or Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms.

Best Paid & Free Alternatives to Autodesk CFD

  • SimScale
  • Ansys Fluent
  • SolidWorks Flow Simulation

Top 10 Alternatives to Autodesk CFD Recently Reviewed By G2 Community

Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Autodesk CFD stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Mechanical or Industrial Engineering, Design, and Higher Education, and find the best product for your business.
    #1
  1. SimScale

    (234)4.6 out of 5
  2. SimScale is revolutionizing the computer-aided engineering sector by providing access to engineering simulation 100% via your web browser and to one of the largest CAE communities in the world. The SimScale web-based platform enables engineering professionals to perform CFD, FEA, Thermodynamics, Acoustics and Particle Analyses, making simulation technology accessible to everyone.

    Categories in common with Autodesk CFD:

    Reviewers say compared to Autodesk CFD, SimScale is:

    Better at support
    #2
  3. Ansys Fluent

    (119)4.5 out of 5
  4. ANSYS Fluent software is the most-powerful computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool available, empowering you to go further and faster as you optimize your product's performance. Fluent includes well-validated physical modeling capabilities to deliver fast, accurate results across the widest range of CFD and multiphysics applications

    Categories in common with Autodesk CFD:

    Reviewers say compared to Autodesk CFD, Ansys Fluent is:

    Better at meeting requirements
    #3
  5. SolidWorks Flow Simulation

    (35)4.1 out of 5
  6. SOLIDWORKS Flow Simulation is an intuitive Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) solution embedded within SOLIDWORKS 3D CAD that enables you to quickly and easily simulate liquid and gas flows through and around your designs to calculate product performance and capabilities.

    Categories in common with Autodesk CFD:
    #4
  7. OpenFOAM

    (35)4.3 out of 5
  8. OpenFOAM is an open-source software used for computational fluid dynamics (or CFD).

    Categories in common with Autodesk CFD:
    #5
  9. COMSOL Multiphysics®

    (36)4.3 out of 5
  10. Engineers and scientists use the COMSOL Multiphysics® software to simulate designs, devices, and processes in all fields of engineering, manufacturing, and scientific research. COMSOL Multiphysics® is a simulation platform that provides fully coupled multiphysics and single-physics modeling capabilities. The Model Builder includes all of the steps in the modeling workflow — from defining geometries, material properties, and the physics that describe specific phenomena to performing computations and evaluating the results. The COMSOL Multiphysics® software brings a user interface and experience that is always the same, regardless of engineering application and physics phenomena. Add-on modules provide specialized functionality for electromagnetics, structural mechanics, acoustics, fluid flow, heat transfer, and chemical engineering. Choose from a list of LiveLink™ products to interface directly with CAD and other third-party software. Deploy simulation applications with COMSOL Compiler™ and COMSOL Server™.

    Categories in common with Autodesk CFD:

    Reviewers say compared to Autodesk CFD, COMSOL Multiphysics® is:

    Better at meeting requirements
    #6
  11. MATLAB

    (729)4.5 out of 5
  12. MATLAB is a programming, modeling and simulation tool developed by MathWorks.

    Categories in common with Autodesk CFD:

    Reviewers say compared to Autodesk CFD, MATLAB is:

    Better at meeting requirements
    #7
  13. SOLIDWORKS

    (598)4.4 out of 5
  14. SOLIDWORKS offers complete 3D software tools that let you create, simulate, publish, and manage your data. SOLIDWORKS products are easy to learn and use, and help you design products better.

    Categories in common with Autodesk CFD:

    Reviewers say compared to Autodesk CFD, SOLIDWORKS is:

    Better at meeting requirements
    #8
  15. Onshape

    By PTC
    (662)4.7 out of 5
  16. Onshape is a modern CAD system that eliminates design gridlock and helps engineers do their best work. Onshape unites advanced modeling tools and design data management in a secure cloud workspace that has rapidly become the primary CAD system for thousands of companies worldwide.

    Categories in common with Autodesk CFD:

    Reviewers say compared to Autodesk CFD, Onshape is:

    Better at support
    More usable
    #9
  17. Solid Edge

    (399)4.3 out of 5
  18. Solid Edge is a portfolio of affordable, easy-to-use software solutions for product development — 3D design, simulation, manufacturing, data management, cloud collaboration, and more. Solid Edge combines the speed and simplicity of direct modeling with the flexibility and control of parametric design – made possible with synchronous technology.

    Categories in common with Autodesk CFD:
    #10
  19. Ansys CFX

    (18)4.6 out of 5
  20. ANSYS CFX is a high-performance computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software tool that delivers reliable and accurate solutions quickly and robustly across a wide range of CFD and multi-physics applications. CFX is recognized for its outstanding accuracy, robustness and speed with rotating machinery such as pumps, fans, compressors, and gas and hydraulic turbines.

    Categories in common with Autodesk CFD:

    Reviewers say compared to Autodesk CFD, Ansys CFX is:

    Better at meeting requirements
    More expensive