AutoAudit Pros and Cons

-customizable and scalable: allows customization of most data fields and drop-down choices; choice of features to implement or ignore, eliminating added beaurocracy.

-data-mining and reporting tool, Snap!Report has resulted in significant time savings in our follow-up processes and status reporting.

- file management: provides a framework to house all working papers and supporting files (.xlsx, .docs. .msg etc); provides version control eliminating the need for multiple versions of a supporting file

-ease of requesting support; prompt response to any support ticket, vendor follow-up and confirmation until resolved.

- use of web-based companion product to collect action plan status comments from clients Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

-closing and audit/project file sets all content to read only (good) but the ability to drag a supporting file from AutoAudit to an email or network location outside the database is lost. (it can still be accessed, but must be opened and saved to a location outside AA).

- update of automated email content is limited; some fields do not import properly.

- difficult to understand triggers to get automated emails working consistently Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Simple to use a document manager for keeping audit files/working papers Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Work flow does not work as expected because of the parameter issues Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

quickly implemented, Best for a specialised usage in Financial services Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Specific use, Financial services monotesting is done easily and can be automated Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.