A sauna integrates well with Microsoft and performs extremely well in scaling our work and allowing us to track what we are doing. It works well with on boarding and supporting our employees and helping them accomplish their task. The user interface is very easy to follow and the price is very affordable. We have used the AI some and it seems to work very well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My dislikes with a sauna mainly have to do with very niche problems that we experience for example, some of the dependency rules and scheduling due dates based off of the rules could use some improvements to become more dynamic and reactive. So mainly the issues become with dynamic role assignments and dynamic due to a assignments that can interact automatically without us having to over program the. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's easy to start new projects and teams. The Google functionality is great. I'm hoping that the rest of my company, beyond my team, will adopt the tool as easily have we have. I haven't gotten too deep into using the AI yet. Right now we are using a basic version of the tool, but I'm hopeful we'll upgrade to a more robust version in the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I've found that I have too many open tasks now and that I'm not tracking some of them very well. The price to upgrade may be prohibitive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the UX and the dashboards. The dashboard lets us have a more visual, rapid look at where we stand with to-dos and progress. The UX gives us the advantage of seamless adoption with the team. I also like the Claude–Asana connector, since our company uses Claude as our main AI tool. The connector lets us set up milestones with the help of Claude and have them show up in Asana without double work. The initial setup was pretty easy, and I loved it. I prefer Asana to Monday, which is why I brought it back to this team again. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

More features at the mid-tier level. I want Asana to offer better workload and team-health visualization. I need to see how each team member is loaded with tasks so I can distribute work better. I want capacity % and alerts when someone is close to be overloaded. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a project manager I have used Asana at multiple companies at this point. It is the only way I feel like we can stay on top the wide range of projects we have going on at once. It is easy to use and allows for people to see it in different views depending on their preference. It is easy to cater the project/task to whatever you need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes I don't know the best way to build something out in Asana. Also sometimes there are so many different projects going on and I don't know the best way to get a bird's eye view of everything that is going on without looking at each email that comes in/manually looking into the tasks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Asana is how effectively it brings structure and visibility to cross-functional work. As someone working closely with Sales Ops, Marketing Ops, and Tech Ops, Asana helps me break down complex, ongoing initiatives into clear projects, tasks, owners, and timelines.

The flexibility of Asana is a big plus — I can use it both for long-term operational projects and day-to-day BAU requests. Features like custom fields, rules, and forms make it easy to standardize intake, prioritize work, and ensure nothing falls through the cracks. It has significantly reduced follow-ups and ad-hoc communication by giving all stakeholders a single source of truth.

Overall, Asana has improved accountability, transparency, and execution across teams, especially in fast-moving operational environments Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Asana is very strong for internal project and task management, it can feel limited when used for request or ticket-style workflows. Features like native SLA tracking, automatic acknowledgements, and ticket IDs are not built in, which means teams need to rely on workarounds using rules, custom fields, or integrations.

Additionally, managing requests coming in via email alongside form submissions can sometimes feel fragmented, especially for operational teams handling high volumes. More robust reporting around ageing tasks and SLA breaches would also be helpful for operational oversight.

That said, these are manageable gaps for many teams, and Asana continues to work well as a flexible and collaborative platform when combined with clear processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Task and subtask setup is what hooked me. I can break down a project into smaller pieces, assign them out, set due dates, and then actually forget about following up because the platform handles that nudging for me. The automations are genuinely useful, not just a feature that sounds good in a demo. I use them to move tasks along based on status changes and it has cut down on a lot of back and forth. The timeline view also helps a lot when I need to see how everything stacks up across a given week or month without digging through a list. Integration with Google Drive was easy to set up and I use it constantly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Search function is not great. If I need to find a task from a few weeks back and I do not remember exactly what it was called or which project it lived in, it can take a while to track it down. For a platform that is supposed to reduce chaos, having a weak search kind of works against that. I know the AI feature is supposed to help with this and it does a little, but it still feels like something that should work better out of the box at this point. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Asana is its task organization and project visibility. It provides a clear and structured way to manage work across teams, making it easy to track progress, priorities, and deadlines. Intuitive task and subtask management. Multiple project views, including List, Board, and Timeline. Easy assignment of tasks, owners, and due dates. Project progress tracking with clear status updates. Good collaboration features such as comments, mentions, and notifications. The most valuable feature is the ability to visualize project progress at both a high level and a detailed task level. Team members can quickly understand what is in progress, what is blocked, and what needs attention without spending time in status meetings. The biggest benefit is improved coordination and accountability. Asana helps keep projects organized, ensures responsibilities are clear, and makes it easier for teams to stay aligned on priorities and deadlines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest challenge is notification management. In active projects with many team members, updates, comments, and task changes can generate a large number of notifications, making it difficult to focus on the most important items. Advanced reporting and analytics are somewhat limited compared to specialized project management tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Asana has been very helpful for our team. We’ve been using it for the past three years, and it has made our work much easier overall. Collaboration between team members is smoother, and ticket management is also far more manageable.

Asana integrates well with tools our teams already use, helping keep project updates, communication, and reporting connected in one place. This reduces context switching and improves overall efficiency.

Performance has been reliable even when managing large projects with multiple stakeholders. Pages load quickly, updates are reflected in real time, and the platform remains responsive during day-to-day use.

The value provided by Asana outweighs the cost. Improved visibility, automation, and project tracking have reduced manual coordination efforts and helped teams save time while delivering work more efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Overall, I had a positive experience with Asana. The main area for improvement would be reducing the learning curve for new users, since some advanced features take time to understand and can feel overwhelming at first. However, once you get the hang of Asana, I think it makes life much easier for managing every task, project, ticket, and more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Asana as a Work Management Platform to map out our day-to-day tasks into larger projects and broader team portfolios. It solves the problem of scattered communication and lack of accountability by centralizing everything, eliminating confusion, and making it clear who owns each task and how it connects to the broader project timeline. I love the highly visual and intuitive user interface, and being able to switch between List, Kanban Board, and Timeline views makes tracking project progress incredibly simple. It feels modern and clean, which helps with quick team adoption. It's so easy to set up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The platform can have a steep learning curve for new users due to the extensive features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Asana all right, especially now that I've gotten past the hard learning curve. I appreciate that it has not just checklists but also a board view. Asana's board view makes it pretty similar to Trello, which is important to me as a visual kinetic learner because drag and drop functionality is crucial. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's too complicated for what it is. You shouldn't need to go consult a YouTube video or dig through endless documentation just to figure out how to create a new tag, for example. It just needs to function more simply. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.