IBM Cloudability Reviews & Product Details

1. Strong chargeback/showback capabilities: Tag- and account-based allocation makes it easier to attribute spend to applications and teams, improving accountability and accelerating cost conversations.

2. Flexible reporting and drill-down: The ability to pivot by service, account, region, and time—and drill from a high-level view into specific cost drivers—supports both executive summaries and engineer-level troubleshooting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Better Kubernetes (EKS) cost attribution and optimization: More accurate split of node/pod costs (including system/daemonset overhead), idle capacity, and actionable recommendations such as cluster autoscaler tuning, bin-packing opportunities, and identifying over-requested CPU/memory at namespace/workload level.

2. Coverage-aware recommendations (RI/SP + discounts): When suggesting rightsizing or shutdown, automatically factor in Savings Plans/Reserved Instances, tiered pricing, and enterprise discounts so the “net savings” reflects what will actually change on the bill (and flags when a change might strand commitments).

3. Anomaly detection with root-cause hints: Stronger proactive alerts that not only detect spikes, but also suggest likely drivers (new tag/app, new account, specific service/API usage, data transfer path) and link directly to the underlying resources and change window.

4. Automation capability: Enable automation capabilities to implement rightsizing recommendations automatically. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about IBM Cloudability is the level of visibility and control it provides across multi-cloud environments. It enables clear cost allocation, accurate showback/chargeback, and helps identify optimization opportunities such as rightsizing and eliminating underutilized resources. The insights are actionable and support better financial governance aligned with FinOps practices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area for improvement in IBM Cloudability is that it works best when there is a well-defined tagging and governance model in place, which can take some time to mature. Additionally, new users may need a bit of time to fully explore all features and reports. However, once properly configured, the platform provides strong value and insights. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I used Clouddability when I was working on an AWS project for my client. Where I need show him the complete costing of - how their infra will look and cost them. There Cloudability helped in presenting the number as well as optimising the resources.

I remember we were able to reduce the cost by 20-25% just following the recommendation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the platform, it's very clean and easy to use and understand. But as some tools CloudZero or AWS Cost Analyser Intelligence dashboard. They are having LLM Capability which is missing for IBM Cloudability. It can improve the customer experience more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate IBM Cloudability for its remarkable ability to ingest and process a vast amount of data efficiently, transforming it into business-friendly information. This feature is particularly valuable as it addresses the challenges posed by significant growth in cloud usage and the increase in billing data points. The tool effectively assesses utilization and optimization, which would be challenging to accomplish manually. It brings transparency into cloud costs and provides real-time access to information, which is crucial for effective cloud cost management. I also value how it significantly simplifies the process of managing cloud costs and usage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the rightsizing recommendations in IBM Cloudability lacking as they do not pull and show memory data; they only display CPU and network information. Moreover, the out-of-the-box options are limited to amortized and cash basis costs, and they do not account for discounts, CSP, or reserved instances, which makes the cost analysis incomplete. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciate IBM Cloudability's ability to manage costs effectively, especially as I migrate workloads to AWS. The feature that stands out most to me is the future cost predictions. It provides valuable insights into both my current and future states of AWS, aiding me in making informed financial decisions. This foresight into costs is invaluable as it keeps me aware of potential expenses, which is crucial for strategic planning and budgeting. Additionally, I found the initial setup of IBM Cloudability to be very straightforward, making it easy to integrate into my existing workflow. These features combined give me confidence in the product, reflected in my high likelihood of recommending it to others. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I feel that the future cost predictions feature in IBM Cloudability could be improved. Specifically, the predictions related to the current state of the workload and usage patterns need enhancement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I truly appreciate IBM Cloudability for its outstanding cost management features, which are essential for our organization and for the clients we advise. The ability to provide organizations with better visibility into overall IT spend is invaluable. I am particularly fond of the user-friendly nature of the platform and how the dashboards are designed. Having a single accessible place to track overall cost spend is highly beneficial, especially when preparing for executive meetings and leadership review calls, as it eliminates the need to spend time and effort on gathering this information manually. I also found the initial setup to be remarkably straightforward, with clearly defined steps, making the onboarding process smooth and uncomplicated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find that the tool could use better AI integration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really appreciate IBM Cloudability for its ability to consolidate our Cloud Service Providers efficiently and manage costs in a streamlined manner. IBM Cloudability's real-time updates are a game-changer, providing us with a single, real-time view of our cloud costs, simplifying complex data from the source systems into an accessible format. This allows our FinOps team to work effectively with the tech teams, make informed recommendations, and identify any anomalies to prevent unnecessary expenses. The ease of setup is another aspect I value, as it was very easy to get started with the platform. Additionally, the consolidated system and reporting capabilities were key reasons for our switch from AWS and Azure products. Overall, these features make IBM Cloudability a valuable tool for ensuring proper allocation and transparency of cloud costs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find it challenging for the finance and FinOps teams to understand discrepancies between the general ledger, CLDY, and TBM Studio. This confusion hampers their ability to reconcile financial data effectively. Additionally, there's a lack of flexibility or visibility into how costs flow from cloud providers. The ability to adjust the CLDY connector to TBM Studio could greatly alleviate these issues and enhance clarity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate the monthly reports and the ability to access close to real-time data. This feature is crucial for efficient monitoring and makes tracking Azure cloud costs more effective through IBM Cloudability. I particularly like how the platform enhances transparency and fosters collaboration between technical and financial teams, allowing leaders to better understand their tracking against cloud investments. The feature that allows viewing Azure consumption by different areas, departments, and applications is extremely valuable, aiding in promoting operational awareness and strategic planning. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find IBM Cloudability's visualization capabilities lacking, with insufficient charts, graphs, and overall flexibility. The low visualization quality hinders my ability to effectively interpret data. Additionally, the platform lacks the dynamic capabilities I expect, similar to tools like Power BI. Mapping and taxonomy were challenges during the initial setup, making it difficult and not easy to configure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I greatly value the almost real-time data provided by IBM Cloudability, which allows me to quickly identify and address anomalies. This capability is essential for making immediate adjustments and ensures that I can modify forecasts as necessary. The reporting feature is another aspect I appreciate, as it offers comprehensive insights that facilitate effective cost and usage reporting. Additionally, I find the ability to perform cost sharing particularly beneficial, as it enables more accurate budgeting and financial planning across different departments or teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would like better integration with other tools, such as TBM Studio, or better ingestion of other datasets to better adjust my dimensions. Additionally, the initial setup was cumbersome since we did not have the right technical people. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate IBM Cloudability for its ease of use, which presents a low learning curve for customers. This feature allows for easy adoption even by non-technical personas, facilitating faster ramp-up and inclusion into workflows. The user interface is particularly commendable, as the navigation and ability to segment within the application contribute significantly to its user-friendliness. Additionally, the initial setup of IBM Cloudability was a breeze, indicating the software’s efficient design and deployment in organizational settings. These aspects make IBM Cloudability not only accessible but also effective in managing cost and usage analysis for cloud services, allowing for detailed breakdown and customization across various dimensions. Overall, my experience with IBM Cloudability has been highly positive, leading me to rate it a 9 out of 10 in terms of likelihood to recommend it to others. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am not satisfied with the current integration of the container agent with Kubecost. The integration is not fully realized yet, which limits its utility. Furthermore, the Apptio container agent could be more robust—it primarily serves as a cost reporting tool without offering many right-sizing recommendations. This limitation affects my ability to optimize effectively. I am also unsure whether the agent has API capabilities similar to those available in other agents, which diminishes its overall functionality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.