89 Flow Reviews
Overall Review Sentiment for Flow
Log in to view review sentiment.
It is not bulletproof but gives you a very good overall understanding of your team's performance. It has a nice UI to identify gaps for your developers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It doesn't handle co-author from git, so there will be missing data if that's something common in your teams Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Flow features integration with popular developer tools such as GitHub. This integration allows Flow to analyze code repositories and provide insights into the skills and expertise of team members. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Can be overly complicated in the data it provides. In some instances, Flow offers a lower level of confidence if data is missing or appears incorrect. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
All my developers in my team absolutely love Flow. They've learnt a lot about their improvement areas and can see improvement over time with data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It was relatively confusing to understand for us. However after using it for a while you get the hang of it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The automatization of the information of each team member. The graphics are useful once you understand them. Also we can share the information with our developers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is confusing at the beginning, where the information come, how can we read the graphics and guide the developers to read their data. If we don't have git development, then the information won't be shown. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is a good way to observe data when comparing it to your intuition. It's a great dashboard for git and Jira work. It's also a place you can go to learn your work patterns as you try to improve yourself. As a leader, it is also a helpful guide to identifying who and what to mentor. It's also easy to spot top performers, as you Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It's just data, as it lacks context. Current work may be more research or learning-oriented which changes commit patterns. Don't make personal decisions just on this data.
Wish it we also track confluence work, as we plan our development using conflunce. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The solution provides a lot of data on the software production process. It facilitates the scaling of the team and the growth of the organization. They will relieve technical leaders from manually analyzing data
makes it easier to set goals for teams and developers.
Providers of additional information (measures) in areas difficult to measure (e.g. knowledge sharing) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Configuration, user management (e.g. users merging) is something that should be ensured that the data is correct. But it's still nothing compared to the benefit of the solution Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Helps us track our impact on the team and how efficient we are with our work which I believe will help us improve by setting a benchmark for ourselves. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I believe it would be more flexible if we could have metrics to compare the quality of code as well rather than just quantity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The platform allows evaluating the impact of each developer by project, technology, team, among others. Not only at the development level as such, but also in how it shares knowledge Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What I like least is that the metric used for days of code is not so clear, if a commit is mixed with another, the history that was advanced is lost.
How to measure that metric could be better configured.
Also the date filters are not so clear (last month maybe should be the last month from the current day, not the previous one) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
