Top Rated Apache BookKeeper Alternatives
Bookkeeper is a real-time storage platform that offers persistent storage for streams of log entries. It is known for its reliability and high performance.
One of the key advantages of Bookkeeper is its ease of use and simplicity, making it accessible for users to learn and utilize effectively. It also provides consistent and durable guarantees for data integrity. By implementing the "write-ahead log" approach, Bookkeeper ensures that data is first persisted to disk before considering a write operation as complete. This ensures that data remains intact and reduces the risk of data loss or inconsistency.
Another notable feature of Bookkeeper is its flexibility and extensibility. It offers a versatile API that seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications. With support for multiple programming languages and frameworks, it can adapt to various use cases. Additionally, Bookkeeper allows for customization through the use of plugins and modules, enabling users to tailor it to their specific requirements.
Overall, Bookkeeper serves as a reliable and high-performing storage solution, providing persistent storage for log entries while offering simplicity, data consistency, and flexibility for integration and customization. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Apace bookkeeper setup is hard. Basic knowledge is required.
Community support is limited.
Limited Documentation and Community Support: Compared to some other widely-used frameworks, Bookkeeper may have relatively limited documentation and community support. This can make it more challenging to troubleshoot issues or find comprehensive resources for learning and development.
Integration Complexity: Integrating Bookkeeper with existing systems or applications can sometimes be complex, requiring careful consideration of compatibility and configuration. This complexity can pose challenges, especially for teams without prior experience in integrating distributed systems.
Development and Maintenance Overhead: Implementing and maintaining Bookkeeper can require dedicated development and operational resources Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
22 out of 23 Total Reviews for Apache BookKeeper
Overall Review Sentiment for Apache BookKeeper
Log in to view review sentiment.
Scalibilty:- It scales horizontally perfectly, allowing it to handle a large number of storage nodes and support high-throughput workloads.
Durability: Once data is written to the ledger, it is durably stored and can be reliably read, even in the face of node failures. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
* Less community support size.
* Distributed systems, in general, can introduce complexity.
* Setting up and configuring Apache BookKeeper can be tough for new users.
* Ease of Integration is not that much Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Durability: Apache BookKeeper provides durable storage for logs by leveraging a distributed write-ahead log (WAL) architecture. It ensures that data is persisted reliably across multiple nodes, even in the presence of failures. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Nothing I like the apache bookkeeper it also provides Low-latency reads and writes: BookKeeper is optimized for low-latency operations, making it suitable for applications that require fast and efficient data processing. It achieves this through techniques such as write-ahead logging, sequential disk I/O, and efficient network protocols. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
With its comprehensive range of features designed to simplify your tasks, Apache BookKeeper has become highly acclaimed in the realm of heavy data processing and live streaming applications. Its open-source availability, scalability, low latency, durability, and more make it an exceptionally popular choice. Specifically optimized for low-latency operations, it proves particularly well-suited for streaming and messaging use cases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
For new users, Apache BookKeeper can initially present a learning curve due to its advanced features and configuration options. It may require some time and effort to gain a full understanding and effectively utilize its capabilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Scales data horizontally and helps is maintaining very large volumes of data easily. Handles real-time streaming data with Low latency and high fault tolerance. Highly consistent with data read and write operation. Connectivity with multiple programming languages and easily integrated with third-party API. Documentation is highly comprehensive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Does not perform complex query operation and need to integrate with another tool for complex querying operations. Dedicated resources are needed to monitor the data cluster. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Apache Bookkeeper is scalable and has very good performance levels and we can also replicate the data across multiple storage devices known as bookies and it was so easy to use such that new users does not require any training. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Actually it is hard to setup and also requires knowledge of Apache zookeeper
It has very limited documentations
And since it is an open source product it has very limited community support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
first is it easy to use. and its all feature are very helpfull for me like( store of log and make replication)
and write log entries (records) to ledgers These log entries can be used to store events, transactions, or any other time-ordered data.and make replica of data across multiple servers that good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
This is support for limited language like java, python ,c++,etc.and other due to size of individual ledgers in BookKeeper is limited so it may not be suitable when very large data requirements for certain applications Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Apache BookKeeper is a storage service in which I liked the most is its scalability nature as it can be easily scalable while working on real time workloads and easily adaptable,and it have enhanced performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
In Apache BookKeeper I disliked the most is it has support to only limited languages and data retrieval is also somewhat complicated in terms of querying and setting up Bookkeeper takes a little bit more time,need to having prior basics to set up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Apache Bookkeeper stores data smoothly and one of the best parts is its fault-tolerant feature. It Can be Scaled horizontally, so if the data increases you don't need to spend a very high amount of money to store theses data this can be taken care of by its multinode cluster horizontal Scaling. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The lack of native querying is the biggest pain. Sometimes additional tools are needed for data retrieval which resulted in the high burn of money. It has very limited language support like Python c++. It also lacks stream processing which is a must nowadays. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Apache BookKeeper is a scalable, low-latency storage service for the distributed real-time system.
BookKeeper replicated the data across multiple storage devices known as bookies, It can be operated to write the logs of our database or applications with a latency of fewer than 5 seconds.
It ensures that the durability and replication of data across various bookies for building highly scalable real
time applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Apache BookKeeper is hard to setup, it requires the knowledge of apache zookeeper.
Limited communtity support.
Limited documentations.
Stograge Overhead: As BookKeeper ensures the durability and replication of data, it results in taking
high storage as compared to other systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
a distributed storage system with fault tolerance and easy scale and simplicity in the implementation is the best that can be found. Also has good community support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
it has some documentation challenges and is limited in terms of language support and management and monitoring tools need to be enhanced also needed some additional configuration and customization Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
