Top Rated Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) Alternatives
AWS SQS is easy to use in our product. by using this service it saved the maximum time to execute the code. if some code runs in background mode without being dependent on API, so user can use SQS service in our product to increase the efficiency of the product. the SQS function runs when the SQS calls the particular lambda function or do you want to trigger our programming logic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Amazon SQS free version is limited if you are using SQS in more frequently in our product then you want to pay for this service. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
141 out of 142 Total Reviews for Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)
Overall Review Sentiment for Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS)
Log in to view review sentiment.
It is really easy to integrate, simple to use, and pay as you use. It also provides a free number of requests, so I have also used it in my projects. It has easy integration with other AWS services. It provides ease of Implementation based on the wide variety of network methods it provides. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It doesn't have packages to integrate with j2ee applications, like integrating a messaging queue in the standalone.xml file of a JBoss server as a messaging bean. We have packages for Active Mq or Rabbit Mq but not sqs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is very easy to integrate and implement with the backend. It manages different complex workflows for queinf multiple requests flawlessly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
In a rare case it fails to execute some api calls under heavy workload. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It is eay to use, integrate and implement in code and also queueing for large data work flawlessly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It takes sometimes time to deliver webhooks from queue and it has message size limitation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I am glad to welcome everyone who works and learns with the cool AWS platform. Not long ago I worked with colleagues on the YOM project - a trading platform similar to OLX (Ukraine). This is a dynamic site with a full backend and frontend, and I was faced with the task of choosing the right storage on AWS, I didn’t have a lot of time and I used Amazon S3 Standard . But after deployment and a more detailed study of storage types thanks to AWS Educate, I realized that there are much more productive and financially profitable solutions such as S3 Intelligent-Tiering, Amazon S3 Express One Zone, as well as many other types of storage for specific developer tasks.
I am very grateful to AWS Educate for the educational course AWS Educate: Getting started with storage. I recommend everyone to try it, I’m sure everyone will find many interesting courses to become a professional in working with AWS. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
In order to effectively choose the right AWS storage from the business decisions and finance side, you need to study a lot of information Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Simplicity, Manageability,Reliability and Scalability
Decoupling and Asynchronous Processing
Security
ease to use Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Limited Message Size,
Limited Visibility Timeout
Potential for Message Ordering Issues
Cost Considerations for High Throughput
Limited Lambda Integration Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
it has No upfront costs,we do not have to need to manage software, and also there is no infrastructure maintenance taht is best about it and also Deliver large volumes of data without losing messages. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
for some users the 256KB size limit restrictive for certain use cases.experience latency due to message processing.lack ofadvance filtering Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Scalability - Eazyiy scales to handle surges in traffic without needing to provision resources manually
Cost-effective - The pay-as-you-go price model makes it economical for startups.
Flexibility - Choose FIFo for ordered processing or standard queues for parallel processing
Reliability - Messages are persistently stored and retired for delivery, ensuring message processing even if the system fails Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The size limit 256Kb is very low for some of the use cases. Latency is one of the problems in the case of the real-time use case. Unable to see the message on the queue and lack of advanced filtering. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Simple, configurable, can be implemented in multiple systems, fit well and easily in cloud based system.
I use it for millions of messages a day and working perfectly, never heard about an outtage there. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Nothing, really. Simple and working well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It have a variety of methods and tools and variants which is detailed for your use case Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
the tools are so sophisticated and there is no free courses to learn how to use them Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
1. Easy to setup and integrate with applications
2. FIFO queues helps reduce complexity of application
3. Message deduplication capability is inbuilt. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
1. No functionality to peek at the message.
2. Visibility timeouts can lead to confusions if not configured properly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
