Top Rated Agisoft PhotoScan Alternatives
13 out of 14 Total Reviews for Agisoft PhotoScan
Agisoft is great for combining images to create 3D models, maps, DEMs, etc. It's extremely user-friendly and produces fantastic results. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
One of the few downsides to Agisoft is that it often takes several hours or even a few days to process my images. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Jack G. Jack G."
the various tools for creating quality photogrammetry scans. This software has many useful features to get the most out of your media to create very high quality point cloud and scan data. Also they have a feature for GPU acceleration which i find extremely useful for professional users who are trying to get the most out of the the program. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
not very convenient to find resources for if you are in a jam- i always rely on looking up resources online if i am in a situation where i am stuck- with this program, I sometimes feel at ends and there should be more reliably information about dealing with different situations as they come up in the program. the software also needs a lot of ram. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Detail it offers when analysing data sets, this would have been unobtainable without using this software. It gave a visual representation of data models Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Some aspects are not as user friendly, warping models if incorrect process used. Made it difficult when deep in modelling as steps needed to be retraced to find issue more often than not. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Dimitrije D. Dimitrije D."
Simple step-by-step processes. Even a non-technical person can easily use it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Cannot extract the data part by part. As in, if I am processing aerial data of about 10 sq. km, there could be a feature to extract the data every 2sq.km or so Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Roberto L. Roberto L."
Is very easy to use and make good result with about 200 photo or more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
required lot of ram for work good and construct a nice 3d mash in few time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I frequently use the Workflow tab on Agisoft to stay organized. This tab shows you what options you have next for the data you have. When creating 3D visualizations, I find this very useful as there are often many steps and it is easy to lose track of where I am in the process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The only major downside to Agisoft is the insane processing time. This is the only software I've used for this kind of work so I'm not aware if anything exists that can process faster. I use a fairly powerful computer and projects still often take upwards of 20 hours to process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
My favorite thing about Agisoft is that it was very easy to learn. I also like that i don’t have to do a lot of the piecing of images together myself. I can basically upload my photos and let the machine do its thing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I don’t like how sometimes when I am using photos of very flat open planes, I have to sometimes do a low quality cloud first before doing something higher quality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.