Top Rated Centro Alternatives
Centro makes it easy to organize and catalog 3D data. It has made a significant improvement in efficiency and organization. The 3D search function makes it easy to call up previous parts for reference and comparison, and Spinfire Web opens quickly and operates nearly lag-free. It has been a valuable tool in creating a more intuitive workflow in our department. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Some file formats are not fully supported by the Spinfire Web client, and there are some features missing from SFW in the 7.4 release. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
11 out of 12 Total Reviews for Centro
Overall Review Sentiment for Centro
Log in to view review sentiment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Georgi M. Georgi M."
I like the ease of use, intuitive interface, helpful tips and customer support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Speed of customer support is not that great, suggestions and improvement proposals by users are not give any priority or not being taken into consideration at all. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Jeffrey S. Jeffrey S."
The software has the ability to watch folders on our network drive, convert various CAD formats, and add the files to a user-friendly database. The web UI enables the user to view CAD assemblies in an organized and accessible manor. It includes a viewer that can rotate, zoom and explode assemblies, a BOM compare tool, and a method of managing users, permissions, and all the various projects that we are working on. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The software relies on an ArangoDB database technology, which I was previously unfamiliar with. According to Actify, ArangoDB is a graph database which adds power to the software beyond what a traditional database could do. Actify recently added support for ArangoDB running on Windows, so that should make it more accessible to inexperienced administrators such as myself. Rather than calling this a "dislike" I would call it a learning opportunity for those who are interested in alternative database technologies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Best thing about Centro is it's ability to create browser-based CAD assemblies that can be viewed in a browser using SpinfireWeb. These CAD assemblies are now accessible to all of our engineering and manufacturing centers across the globe.
Centro is also wonderful at 3D shape-searching where it can find duplicate and similar parts with just a few clicks. There is tremendous amount of cost-savings potential with this feature.
Once you are trained in creating pipelines using the "Quick publisher", creating Catalog Part assemblies is a breeze. It is IT-heavy in global enterprise installations, so training will get a little thick. Overall, once you master pipelining, you'll want to import all of your data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Unfortunately, latency/lag is horrendous on cross-continental distributed architecture installations. Add the overhead of crossing the Atlantic, PLUS any WAN overhead you may encounter, and the product is virtually unusable. We are considering breaking up the Arango database into two separate installations (one in North America and one in Germany) to help us with latency. Until that happens, only our North American users are using Centro.
Also, there is very little fault-tolerance with pipelines. If you are pipelining an assembly, there is no way to know if there are any inconsistencies with the assembly (broken links, assembly trying to access components stored on a directory inaccessible to Centro service account, etc.) until after the pipeline errors out. Then you are left with a Project with dozens of decoupled components and a broken top level assembly. Furthermore, pipeline error handling is basically useless to even the highest level administrators since the error codes and error messages are very cryptic. It is almost impossible to troubleshoot an error without pulling in Actify developers to help us trouble shoot the issue. Error messages need to be simplified so that we (the customers) can self-help our issues. Right now that's impossible.
Document management isn't a built-in feature in Centro. As a matter-of-fact, Centro is a CAD solution and not really made for structured document management. All of our engineering documents are currently organized in a Windows folder-based structure. Centro does not offer folder-based organization for document management. You have to upload documents into a Catalog Part (that was originally developed to store CAD assemblies and components) and organize them by Tags or Categories one-by-one. This is extremely time-consuming if you just uploaded 100 engineering documents and now you have to throw Tags on each document or individually categorize them. Our work-around was to create a fake/empty CAD assembly that mimics our folder structure and pipeline that assembly without uploading native CAD. This gives us collapsible "folder-like" Catalog Parts where users can upload their engineering documents. It's not perfect by any means, but it's something that is familiar (folders and sub-folders) to end users. Centro really needs a better way at handling engineering documents.
System pipeline needs some customization. Right now it is hard-coded to run only one concurrent job. It needs prioritization and the ability to tweak timeout settings, and how many concurrent jobs it can run. We have that ability on all our other pipelines. Why don't we have same options in System pipeline? A usage case for this is if a user decides that they need to create a STEP conversion from the drop down menu. That conversion won't start until all other System pipeline jobs are completed.
Some other minor dislikes: 1) CAD attributes (metadata) being stripped during a simple check-out/check-in, 2) No way to use assembly resource manager to add/remove components of an assembly (the only way to do this is force a pipeline update from watch directory), 3) CAD-to-CAD converters not working properly in previous releases, and 4) Unsatisfactory quality-assurance testing with Centro revisions (in a production environment we were down for a few days until fixes were implemented) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The 3D viewer that opens very quickly, Pipeline is efficient and quick. Overall using this app makes it easier on my computer. I can also access centro anywhere on other computers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
the heaviness of the project folder loading time when too many folders are in it Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I like being able to look at the data/ quote information all in one place as well as store all of my quote information. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I am still getting use to the check in/ check out feature. This takes some getting used to when updating quotes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
It's web-based, accessible to any authorized user, and is pretty easy to use once trained and comfortable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
We tried using Centro for CAD Data control... check-in / check-out control, and we have struggled for some time to get it to work. Seems strange, as Centro is made for this kind of thing. I think in some ways, we have created some of our own issues, trying to connect Insight and Centro. Actify team is now working with other companies (bigger) maybe we can benefit from their resources. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I like the speed with which it opens data Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I have not found anything yet...at first I did not like not being able to see an entire file name...when long...but love that I can give any file a nick name Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa835/fa835700d0029abb748fdea8175e314678d2375d" alt="Greg V. Greg V."
How simple the system is for an average computer user to understand. Also like the one page report and the ability to push the BOM into PLEX Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The method CAD files are stored as history Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.