I like most of the features, such as quick run, AI-powered, self-healing, recorder, and distributed agent.It is easy to learn and use and can be integrated with other application as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If you are unable to interact with the element or create logic, the ACCELQ support team will help, but you will need to be more patient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The rich set of commands in for of NLP and the possibilities of customization using user extension. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Desktop based applications automation for other than Microsoft Apps is challenging. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Test Automation Cloud Platform designed to simplify and accelerate the process of creating/executing/maintaining automated tests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Limited capabilities for desktop automation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Effortless automation with a user-friendly UI. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some integrations need smoother configuration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The user friendly interface and features, such as drag and drop test case creation, reporting. This significantly speeds up the testing process without need of deep programming knowledge. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Even though it’s easier than traditional programming there’s still a need for training to fully understand how to use the platform effectively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ease of LEarning the product within no time Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Community Licensing model may have been incorporated Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Based on my experience as a Salesforce QA Engineer, I can confirm that Salesforce typically releases three updates per year. With each update, new features are introduced while some older mechanisms may cease to function. As a tester, adapting to these changes can be challenging, but using ACCELQ has alleviated much of that concern for me. AccelQ's ability to seamlessly handle updates on the platform is one of its standout features, making it a valuable tool in my testing toolkit. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As of now, truthfully speaking, my experience with this tool has been overwhelmingly positive, with every point in its favor. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ACCELQ is a great test automation tool that I've seen so far. We have been using ACCELQ for more than 1.5years now and running more than 1000 test scripts in multiple domains and platforms (web based, D365 FinOps CRM, APIs, Desktop) and in creating all these we don't need any programming skills.That's the magic of the ACCELQ No/Low code tool.

The implementation process which starts from engaging sales, planning for on-boarding, training, creation of scripts with the help of ACCELQ Product Specialists and support throughout the journey is remarkable by the team.

They always reply to your queries no matter how big or small it is.We never hear the word 'No' from the team.

ACCELQ is easy to blend in our regular sprints, it is cloud based not to worry about check-in check-out, project creation, complex integration script creation are all quite easy.Easy to schedule scripts, easy to view reports and easy to send report notification to the team members.

I would highly recommend this tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Contex, Actions, scenarios sharing across the projects could be better.

Refresher training planning of new release features could be better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My experience with ACCELQ has been excellent. The platform offers an intuitive interface, making it easy to design and execute test cases easy to use product Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some times it get slow if there is large data set otherwise product is super Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have tried a few codeless/low-code softwares for different purposes in different job roles and where ACCELQ stands out is how intuitive it is to build and scale testcases (using the live-record and playback function). We have in a relatively low amount of time built large parts of our regression test suites with a great width (running each test case several times with different users) and even validating pretty complex and dynamic objects such as graphs.

We run the test cases consistently, almost weekly and so far the test cases themselves are very robust and quick to execute thanks to the possibility to run the tests in paralell.

The few issues we ran into during this time (mostly questions regarding functionality and know-how) were quickly resolved by the teams support functions - getting a callback, adhoc meeting or even educational sessions all took place depending on our issue and need.

We opted for the "PS engagement" where an experienced test engineer worked with us for some weeks at the beginning of the problem which significantly sped up our implementation of the product.

So far we have also set up some integrations, namely we are sending test reports to a team channel that all of our team has access to so that they can analyze the results as well as started setting up our CI/CD pipelines to run our testcases automatically whenever we push new code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only real downside I could find so far is that we found it easier to write our testcases in English as some nordic characters are missing in certain aspects of the software (åäö). However, this is a minor issue and something we are told is likely to be improved eventually. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.