Comparer PlayetSpark Software 
Play vs Spark
Lors de l'évaluation des deux solutions, les évaluateurs ont trouvé Spark plus facile à utiliser, à administrer et à faire des affaires dans l'ensemble. Cependant, les évaluateurs ont préféré la facilité de configuration avec Play.
- Les évaluateurs ont estimé que Spark répond mieux aux besoins de leur entreprise que Play.
- En comparant la qualité du support produit continu, les évaluateurs ont estimé que Spark est l'option préférée.
- Pour les mises à jour des fonctionnalités et les feuilles de route, nos évaluateurs ont préféré la direction de Play à Spark.
You can transcend skill sets by using Play! as an intermediary between having your development team learn a more modern JVM language (Scala) and Java. The framework's power can still very easily be seen using Java methods, and in-fact I personally prefer to...
Vraiment trop petit Il y a plus d'accord Peu de ressources chinoises
Easier to implement in comparison to other methods Better documentations
The client itself seemed to have a bit of limited functionality in comparison to other clients (such as Adium) in terms of logging (locally). I would have simply used Adium solely when connecting to the Jabber server, other than it has *limited* fastpath...
You can transcend skill sets by using Play! as an intermediary between having your development team learn a more modern JVM language (Scala) and Java. The framework's power can still very easily be seen using Java methods, and in-fact I personally prefer to...
Easier to implement in comparison to other methods Better documentations
Vraiment trop petit Il y a plus d'accord Peu de ressources chinoises
The client itself seemed to have a bit of limited functionality in comparison to other clients (such as Adium) in terms of logging (locally). I would have simply used Adium solely when connecting to the Jabber server, other than it has *limited* fastpath...
