Lors de l'évaluation des deux solutions, les examinateurs ont trouvé SoftChalk plus facile à utiliser, à mettre en place et à faire des affaires dans l'ensemble. Cependant, les examinateurs ont préféré la facilité d'administration avec Lectora.
It’s versatile and offers all the tools required to develop effective training.
If you want to do anything beyond the basic text-and-picture page, or use any interactions that Lectora does not already have built in, it will fight you every step of the way. The code it generates is cryptic, and the software is so buggy that it prevents...
Easy to set up and to use. There are a lot of functions that might need high skills in JAVASCRIPT or HTML Language but Softchalk made it easy to create those learning objects without such knowledge.
The support for safari or macs in general is abysmal. I've stopped using SoftChalk because of it.
It’s versatile and offers all the tools required to develop effective training.
Easy to set up and to use. There are a lot of functions that might need high skills in JAVASCRIPT or HTML Language but Softchalk made it easy to create those learning objects without such knowledge.
If you want to do anything beyond the basic text-and-picture page, or use any interactions that Lectora does not already have built in, it will fight you every step of the way. The code it generates is cryptic, and the software is so buggy that it prevents...
The support for safari or macs in general is abysmal. I've stopped using SoftChalk because of it.