Lors de l'évaluation des deux solutions, les examinateurs ont trouvé Plone CMS plus facile à utiliser, à configurer et à administrer. Les examinateurs ont également préféré faire des affaires avec Plone CMS dans l'ensemble.
This is a robust CMS which allows a lot of options, personalisations and features to create a solid website.
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
Était facile à utiliser car la plupart des personnes travaillant dessus n'étaient pas des professionnels bien versés dans les sites web.
IMO bottle neck is in using images; I had to make an overwork to handle them by static external system for better performance (*loading pages took some times even 16 seconds). I also dislike 3rd packages that the value of code some times was weak. From...
This is a robust CMS which allows a lot of options, personalisations and features to create a solid website.
Était facile à utiliser car la plupart des personnes travaillant dessus n'étaient pas des professionnels bien versés dans les sites web.
The backend (for admins) is complicated, and not intuitive, the set up of modules and nodes is cumbersome and implementation of these is outdated, the front-end also doesnt come close to delivering a decent UX. I guess it could work for sites that spend...
IMO bottle neck is in using images; I had to make an overwork to handle them by static external system for better performance (*loading pages took some times even 16 seconds). I also dislike 3rd packages that the value of code some times was weak. From...