Lors de l'évaluation des deux solutions, les évaluateurs ont trouvé que Nucleus était plus facile à utiliser. Cependant, les évaluateurs ont préféré la facilité de configuration de Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) ainsi que son administration. Les évaluateurs ont convenu que les deux fournisseurs facilitent également la conduite des affaires dans l'ensemble.
Kenna score, statut de vulnérabilité, correctifs
sometime its hard to work with queries , they should work more on creating simple queries.
Automation rules help with configuration.
It's in the title. The product is unreliable. The platform is buggy, and in the opinion of most of the people I work with that use Nucleus regularly, this has gotten worse over time, not better. The new features are nice, but a working product is nicer....
Kenna score, statut de vulnérabilité, correctifs
Automation rules help with configuration.
sometime its hard to work with queries , they should work more on creating simple queries.
It's in the title. The product is unreliable. The platform is buggy, and in the opinion of most of the people I work with that use Nucleus regularly, this has gotten worse over time, not better. The new features are nice, but a working product is nicer....